Conquer Club

GOP Presidential Nominees

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Who do you like so far

 
Total votes : 0

Re: GOP Presidential Nominees

Postby notyou2 on Wed Apr 09, 2014 6:19 am

I'm voting for the Canadian.
Image
User avatar
Captain notyou2
 
Posts: 6447
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:09 am
Location: In the here and now

Re: GOP Presidential Nominees

Postby Symmetry on Wed Apr 09, 2014 3:41 pm

chang50 wrote:Well I voted for Perry because surely it's impossible to lose against a man who has ordered Texas prisons not to follow rape prevention laws,and who presided over the execution in Aug 2012 of an imbecile with an IQ of 61.Of course he wont win the nomination,that would be political suicide..


Don't forget presiding over the execution of an innocent man, then spending years sabotaging any investigation into it.
Last edited by Symmetry on Thu Apr 10, 2014 12:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
User avatar
Sergeant Symmetry
 
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am

Re: GOP Presidential Nominees

Postby ooge on Thu Apr 10, 2014 2:29 am

chang50 wrote:Well I voted for Perry because surely it's impossible to lose against a man who has ordered Texas prisons not to follow rape prevention laws,and who presided over the execution in Aug 2012 of an imbecile with an IQ of 61.Of course he wont win the nomination,that would be political suicide..


To think Perry started out as a democrat but then again so did Ronbo The Warlord Reagan at least in the end they ended up in the right party for them.
Image
User avatar
Captain ooge
 
Posts: 594
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 2:31 am
Location: under a bridge

Re: GOP Presidential Nominees

Postby ooge on Thu Apr 10, 2014 2:30 am

notyou2 wrote:I'm voting for the Canadian.


Are you referring to Rafael?
Image
User avatar
Captain ooge
 
Posts: 594
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 2:31 am
Location: under a bridge

Re: GOP Presidential Nominees

Postby chang50 on Thu Apr 10, 2014 6:49 am

ooge wrote:
chang50 wrote:Well I voted for Perry because surely it's impossible to lose against a man who has ordered Texas prisons not to follow rape prevention laws,and who presided over the execution in Aug 2012 of an imbecile with an IQ of 61.Of course he wont win the nomination,that would be political suicide..


To think Perry started out as a democrat but then again so did Ronbo The Warlord Reagan at least in the end they ended up in the right party for them.


I knew about Reagan but had no idea about Perry.Texas being Texas must have wanted the biggest prick possible in charge.
User avatar
Captain chang50
 
Posts: 659
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 4:54 am
Location: pattaya,thailand

Re: GOP Presidential Nominees

Postby notyou2 on Thu Apr 10, 2014 9:15 am

ooge wrote:
notyou2 wrote:I'm voting for the Canadian.


Are you referring to Rafael?


Teddy the Cruiser
Image
User avatar
Captain notyou2
 
Posts: 6447
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:09 am
Location: In the here and now

Re: GOP Presidential Nominees

Postby Gillipig on Thu Apr 17, 2014 4:18 am

BigBallinStalin wrote:
Nola_Lifer wrote:
Gillipig wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:Fascism and Communism are the two poles of the simple left v right political spectrum.


SYM WINS!!!



I DON'T AGREE!!!


Gillipig admit it he won. He trolled another thread and completely derailed it. CLAIM HIM AS WINNER!


I gave both of you the Sore Losers prize along with a 3/5 for attitude. 5/5 for fair play though. Still not sure about gameplay, so I left it blank.

I think he's more sore than I am, given what I know of his sexual habits.
AoG for President of the World!!
I promise he will put George W. Bush to shame!
User avatar
Lieutenant Gillipig
 
Posts: 3565
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 1:24 pm

Re: GOP Presidential Nominees

Postby Phatscotty on Thu Apr 17, 2014 9:27 pm

Wow Jeb Bush is starting to heat up!!! I really don't see how we can run a Bush again. I can see how someone might feel he is one of the 3 best picks out of what is available, but if he wins I wouldn't expect anything I care about to change. Sure I would take him over Hillary Clinton, but I think Rand Paul has a great shot at shaking things up. The primaries are sure to be exciting.
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: GOP Presidential Nominees

Postby saxitoxin on Thu May 08, 2014 12:44 pm

saxitoxin wrote:I'm glad @patches70 mentioned the Adelson thing. Adelson is the right-wing answer to George Soros, except he has twice the money and is arguably twice as crazy (which is a pretty big accomplishment since Soros is a nutjob). It made me want to puke that Christie went crawling into a backroom to grovel in front of Ginger the Hutt. Adelson is The Worst Person in the World.


LMAO ... Israel: bringing Democrats and Republicans together since 1963 ...

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has for some time billed the Koch brothers as public enemy No.1 .

But billionaire Republican donor Sheldon Adelson? He’s just fine, Reid says.

ā€œI know Sheldon Adelson. He’s not in this for money,ā€ the Nevada Democrat said of Adelson. ā€œHe’s in it because he has certain ideological views. He’s not in it to make money."

Adelson, whose company owns several Las Vegas hotels and casinos including The Venetian, has recently led a major push against online gambling.

http://www.politico.com/story/2014/05/h ... 06484.html
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
User avatar
Corporal saxitoxin
 
Posts: 13411
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am

Re: GOP Presidential Nominees

Postby Phatscotty on Thu May 08, 2014 4:09 pm

saxitoxin wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:I'm glad @patches70 mentioned the Adelson thing. Adelson is the right-wing answer to George Soros, except he has twice the money and is arguably twice as crazy (which is a pretty big accomplishment since Soros is a nutjob). It made me want to puke that Christie went crawling into a backroom to grovel in front of Ginger the Hutt. Adelson is The Worst Person in the World.


LMAO ... Israel: bringing Democrats and Republicans together since 1963 ...

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has for some time billed the Koch brothers as public enemy No.1 .

But billionaire Republican donor Sheldon Adelson? He’s just fine, Reid says.

ā€œI know Sheldon Adelson. He’s not in this for money,ā€ the Nevada Democrat said of Adelson. ā€œHe’s in it because he has certain ideological views. He’s not in it to make money."

Adelson, whose company owns several Las Vegas hotels and casinos including The Venetian, has recently led a major push against online gambling.

http://www.politico.com/story/2014/05/h ... 06484.html


Casino's are still one of the best ways to move political monetary contributions/kickbacks without anyone knowing and no records. I wouldn't be surprised if Reid ended up hiring Jake Abramoff at some point in the future
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: GOP Presidential Nominees

Postby patches70 on Thu May 08, 2014 5:08 pm

saxitoxin wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:I'm glad @patches70 mentioned the Adelson thing. Adelson is the right-wing answer to George Soros, except he has twice the money and is arguably twice as crazy (which is a pretty big accomplishment since Soros is a nutjob). It made me want to puke that Christie went crawling into a backroom to grovel in front of Ginger the Hutt. Adelson is The Worst Person in the World.


LMAO ... Israel: bringing Democrats and Republicans together since 1963 ...

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has for some time billed the Koch brothers as public enemy No.1 .

But billionaire Republican donor Sheldon Adelson? He’s just fine, Reid says.

ā€œI know Sheldon Adelson. He’s not in this for money,ā€ the Nevada Democrat said of Adelson. ā€œHe’s in it because he has certain ideological views. He’s not in it to make money."

Adelson, whose company owns several Las Vegas hotels and casinos including The Venetian, has recently led a major push against online gambling.

http://www.politico.com/story/2014/05/h ... 06484.html


OMFG. And just when I thought my opinion on Harry "Balls" Reid couldn't get any worse.
Private patches70
 
Posts: 1664
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:44 pm

Re: GOP Presidential Nominees

Postby danfrank666 on Fri May 09, 2014 8:06 am

Phatscotty wrote:Remember to support your favorites in your state primary or caucus.



:lol: Sounds desperate
User avatar
Cadet danfrank666
 
Posts: 170
Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2014 7:32 pm

Re: GOP Presidential Nominees

Postby Phatscotty on Fri May 09, 2014 10:30 pm

danfrank666 wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:Remember to support your favorites in your state primary or caucus.



:lol: Sounds desperate


:?: how is that?

100 saxbucks I get no response. Double or nothing if there is a reply it will possess zero relevance.
Last edited by Phatscotty on Fri May 09, 2014 10:35 pm, edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: GOP Presidential Nominees

Postby saxitoxin on Fri May 09, 2014 10:33 pm

I've decided Conrad James has a more impressive resume than any of these guys, and he's stuck trading IMs with Metsfanmax and duking it out for a shitty state house seat in New Mexico.

What's worse - (a) spending a day talking about thermodynamics with Mets, or, (b) spending a day in New Mexico doing anything?
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
User avatar
Corporal saxitoxin
 
Posts: 13411
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am

Re: GOP Presidential Nominees

Postby BigBallinStalin on Fri May 09, 2014 11:01 pm

(1) GOP has to be pro-immigration to sop up all those immigrant votes. Hire a good PR firm to mitigate the naysayers about 'dem foreignurs takin dur jobbs!' and you've got the election in the bag.

(2) Take a more anti-war stance. The more popular of wars have been favored mostly by liberals (cuz humanitariasmurrr!!), so that should be easy. Play the hard ball game with voters versus Iran and other imaginary enemies (North Korea, Russia, China). "Iran will not get nuclear weapons!!!"

(3) Criticize NSA surveillance of US citizens; promise reform (while not doing anything later).

(4) Criticize the Drone Strikes then later don't do much about it.

(5) Throw out some pro-God messages.

(6) Blast the healthcare/insurance program---then either do nothing about it, or attempt to implement a substitute.


And the GOP should win. If the democrats run Hillary as president, then either (1) scramble for an equivalent female, or (2) go with Rand Paul. Rand Paul is nice because he unifies the "right" group (quasi-libertarians and Republican voters), and given the Democratic offer, Republican voters would find Rand Paul superior.
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: GOP Presidential Nominees

Postby saxitoxin on Fri May 09, 2014 11:18 pm

BigBallinStalin wrote:(1) GOP has to be pro-immigration to sop up all those immigrant votes. Hire a good PR firm to mitigate the naysayers about 'dem foreignurs takin dur jobbs!' and you've got the election in the bag.

(2) Take a more anti-war stance. The more popular of wars have been favored mostly by liberals (cuz humanitariasmurrr!!), so that should be easy. Play the hard ball game with voters versus Iran and other imaginary enemies (North Korea, Russia, China). "Iran will not get nuclear weapons!!!"

(3) Criticize NSA surveillance of US citizens; promise reform (while not doing anything later).

(4) Criticize the Drone Strikes then later don't do much about it.

(5) Throw out some pro-God messages.

(6) Blast the healthcare/insurance program---then either do nothing about it, or attempt to implement a substitute.

And the GOP should win. If the democrats run Hillary as president, then either (1) scramble for an equivalent female, or (2) go with Rand Paul. Rand Paul is nice because he unifies the "right" group (quasi-libertarians and Republican voters), and given the Democratic offer, Republican voters would find Rand Paul superior.


Yes ... agree on all points.

If Hillary runs they gotta come out with a novelty candidate. Since black and female is taken that leaves Asian, Gay, Native American, Disabled, ESL, Muslim, Vegetarian, Virgin, or Hispanic. I don't think Republicans have any of those. (Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz are the whitest hispanics alive so don't count, and Bobby Jindal is too weak and scrawny to fill the Asian role; Americans want physically substantial men as president.) It used to be that being a war hero would be a home run but there's a glut of war heroes at the moment due to current events.

I predict Republicans take the House and Senate, and Hillary takes the White House in a close race, but only serves one term.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
User avatar
Corporal saxitoxin
 
Posts: 13411
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am

Re: GOP Presidential Nominees

Postby Metsfanmax on Sat May 10, 2014 12:39 am

saxitoxin wrote:I've decided Conrad James has a more impressive resume than any of these guys, and he's stuck trading IMs with Metsfanmax and duking it out for a shitty state house seat in New Mexico.

What's worse - (a) spending a day talking about thermodynamics with Mets, or, (b) spending a day in New Mexico doing anything?


The days in New Mexico are a little bit easier to get through when you've got me by your virtual side.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Metsfanmax
 
Posts: 6722
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:01 pm

Re: GOP Presidential Nominees

Postby danfrank666 on Sun May 11, 2014 9:38 am

Phatscotty wrote:
danfrank666 wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:Remember to support your favorites in your state primary or caucus.



:lol: Sounds desperate


:?: how is that?

100 saxbucks I get no response. Double or nothing if there is a reply it will possess zero relevance.


Relevant to ? saxbucks ? are they like bit coins ? Well thats worth 100 and now there worthless in response to you :lol: Relevant to the list of irrelevants you have compiled to represent the Grand Ole Party. Headed by huckabee :lol: A list populated with christie , bush , rubio and herman cain :roll: :lol: . We can evaluate important issues that affect US society . Then we can apply the 19 to each issue . Or we can generalize the bylaws of the republican party and see where they really stand . OR i could just respond

danfrank666 wrote: :lol: Sounds desperate


I would have liked to see Thomas Jefferson Johnson ( any idea? ) on that list . I`ll vote for him :lol:
User avatar
Cadet danfrank666
 
Posts: 170
Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2014 7:32 pm

Re: GOP Presidential Nominees

Postby danfrank666 on Sun May 11, 2014 10:26 am

BigBallinStalin wrote:(1) GOP has to be pro-immigration to sop up all those immigrant votes. Hire a good PR firm to mitigate the naysayers about 'dem foreignurs takin dur jobbs!' and you've got the election in the bag.

(2) Take a more anti-war stance. The more popular of wars have been favored mostly by liberals (cuz humanitariasmurrr!!), so that should be easy. Play the hard ball game with voters versus Iran and other imaginary enemies (North Korea, Russia, China). "Iran will not get nuclear weapons!!!"

(3) Criticize NSA surveillance of US citizens; promise reform (while not doing anything later).

(4) Criticize the Drone Strikes then later don't do much about it.

(5) Throw out some pro-God messages.

(6) Blast the healthcare/insurance program---then either do nothing about it, or attempt to implement a substitute.


And the GOP should win. If the democrats run Hillary as president, then either (1) scramble for an equivalent female, or (2) go with Rand Paul. Rand Paul is nice because he unifies the "right" group (quasi-libertarians and Republican voters), and given the Democratic offer, Republican voters would find Rand Paul superior.




Blah Blah Blah. Should i go point by point. When you say immigration , you mean illegal aliens , correct :?: , who do they really take jobs from , How about the kids , the kids who need to learn personal responsibility , you must be mr canning , iran will get nukes , take credit for the nsa , add regulations to feel less violated, i can agree with 4 , but any half brain knows that 3 and 4 are gop initiatives , Yes we need god , i mean thats what america was founded on , right ? to moral or not to moral that is the question , oh yeah and number 6 , self contradiction :-s , which angle Corporations , single payer , VA , doing nothing is not an option.
And Now hillary , oh wait capital H , sorry , deep down you want her to win :lol: What does she have to run on , the legacy of bill , healthcares been changed, What bill did was reform welfare ( which we surely need today ) but taxes pay for a civilized society .
User avatar
Cadet danfrank666
 
Posts: 170
Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2014 7:32 pm

Re: GOP Presidential Nominees

Postby BigBallinStalin on Sun May 11, 2014 11:45 am

Hold on. I'm having trouble understanding your post, so with a little help:


"Waiting, waiting, waiting, waiting. If you want to understand, what is the average illegal immigrant? : 4 God needed to Iran's nuclear effort and brain child of 3 credits of research probably up to four, on average half of violations of personal responsibility: United States Republican homeland? When asked what is my moral, number 6, automatic access or my lack of morality: a perspective of the company is a single-payer in Virginia. The capital h is, unfortunately, is that Mrs Clinton, Oh wait, is running a deep cultural heritage: civilization today pay taxes and social reform (modification) haha, of course, including the construction of a bill on health."


Gee, you bring up some great points about personal responsibility violations from brain children of 3 credits. I'm not sure about the "civilization today pay taxes and social reform (modification) haha" hypothesis, so let's get Phatscotty to weigh in his expertise on fiscal policy.
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: GOP Presidential Nominees

Postby xtratabasco on Mon May 12, 2014 6:54 pm

if we could just get ole half-hand bob dole to run again, and bring on criminal song bird mcCain as VP and get sean fuxed up hannity in there too somewhere and that lying left gate keeper from democracy now 2, and maybe revvvvrand al sharpton to round it out.

with black box voting the citizens will never get what we want.


and we all know the lobbiest and fortune 500 companies along with the war machine and banksters really run the show.
User avatar
Corporal xtratabasco
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:24 pm

Re: GOP Presidential Nominees

Postby Phatscotty on Mon May 12, 2014 8:45 pm

danfrank666 wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
danfrank666 wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:Remember to support your favorites in your state primary or caucus.



:lol: Sounds desperate


:?: how is that?

100 saxbucks I get no response. Double or nothing if there is a reply it will possess zero relevance.


Relevant to ? saxbucks ? are they like bit coins ? Well thats worth 100 and now there worthless in response to you :lol: Relevant to the list of irrelevants you have compiled to represent the Grand Ole Party. Headed by huckabee :lol: A list populated with christie , bush , rubio and herman cain :roll: :lol: . We can evaluate important issues that affect US society . Then we can apply the 19 to each issue . Or we can generalize the bylaws of the republican party and see where they really stand . OR i could just respond

danfrank666 wrote: :lol: Sounds desperate


I would have liked to see Thomas Jefferson Johnson ( any idea? ) on that list . I`ll vote for him :lol:


uhhhhhhh, okay lol
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: GOP Presidential Nominees

Postby danfrank666 on Mon May 12, 2014 9:11 pm

xtratabasco wrote:
and we all know the lobbiest and fortune 500 companies along with the war machine and banksters really run the show.


What Show ?


[imghttp://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http%3A%2F%2F31.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_ls3ayiEZ3I1qmr448o1_r1_500.jpg&imgrefurl=http%3A%2F%2Ffilmtrivia.tumblr.com%2Fpost%2F10713938660%2Fthe-you-think-im-funny-scene-was-based-on-a&h=243&w=500&tbnid=qb1fc19CHOW0aM%3A&zoom=1&docid=ML7c8ehVBG4BdM&ei=AH9xU4rtIc2GogTmqYHwDg&tbm=isch&ved=0CKwBEDMoTzBP&iact=rc&uact=3&dur=2992&page=4&start=72&ndsp=26][/img]
User avatar
Cadet danfrank666
 
Posts: 170
Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2014 7:32 pm

Re: GOP Presidential Nominees

Postby xtratabasco on Mon May 12, 2014 9:15 pm

danfrank666 wrote:
xtratabasco wrote:
and we all know the lobbiest and fortune 500 companies along with the war machine and banksters really run the show.


What Show ?


[imghttp://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http%3A%2F%2F31.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_ls3ayiEZ3I1qmr448o1_r1_500.jpg&imgrefurl=http%3A%2F%2Ffilmtrivia.tumblr.com%2Fpost%2F10713938660%2Fthe-you-think-im-funny-scene-was-based-on-a&h=243&w=500&tbnid=qb1fc19CHOW0aM%3A&zoom=1&docid=ML7c8ehVBG4BdM&ei=AH9xU4rtIc2GogTmqYHwDg&tbm=isch&ved=0CKwBEDMoTzBP&iact=rc&uact=3&dur=2992&page=4&start=72&ndsp=26][/img]



the dog and pony circus known as amerika
User avatar
Corporal xtratabasco
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:24 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: jonesthecurl