Metsfanmax wrote:Night Strike wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:There's a very important difference between procedural tactics like the filibuster and procedural tactics like the one Van Hollen commented on. With a filibuster, you effectively change what it takes to obtain a majority in the Senate from 51 votes to 60 votes. The process is nevertheless still democratic in the sense that each person has the same vote. But this provision the Republicans passed goes well beyond that and essentially makes the vote of one member of the house substantially more influential than the vote of any other member.
So exactly like what Harry Reid has been doing in the Senate for several years, including as part of the way to block votes on the House version of the CR. Much of the legislation he allows on the Senate floor is banned from having amendments except those submitted by the Chair (him).
So... you're defending what the Republicans did here because the Democrats have done it too??
Yes, that's what he's doing. It's very slightly different than what I'm doing (which is attacking Democrats for doing the same thing).