Epstein Client List

[HitRed]

People vote pocket book issues. Job, mortgage, keeping the lights on and food on the table.

[mookiemcgee]

People vote pocket book issues. Job, mortgage, keeping the lights on and food on the table.

Lol, and how's that going for them

[mookiemcgee]

Just a quick visual update for anyone trying to keep up

[jusplay4fun]

Just a quick visual update for anyone trying to keep up

Thanks for this important summary and update, Mookie, for those confused by all the moving pieces.

[mookiemcgee]

Trump's real big beautiful Bill

[riskllama]

ConfedSS has a point, something I made a while back: If the Dems had anything on Trump, why was such evidence NOT RELEASED

A) in the 2024 election campaign or

B) during the time Biden had access to the Epstein files via the FBI and DOJ?

Please note:

no criminal wrongdoing has ever been established against Trump in connection with Epstein's crimes

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relationship_of_Donald_Trump_and_Jeffrey_Epstein

and

Executive Summary

The evidence assembled in the provided analyses shows no verified instance of a Jeffrey Epstein victim formally accusing Donald Trump of participating in or committing sexual abuse; victims’ statements and memoirs referenced do not directly allege Trump’s involvement (...)

6. Bottom line for readers weighing the claim

Based on the assembled analyses, the correct, evidence‑based conclusion is clear: Victims of Jeffrey Epstein have not, in the provided reporting and memoir excerpts, accused Donald Trump of involvement in Epstein’s abuse. There is documented association and public controversy, and there are continuing questions about the thoroughness of investigations that keep the topic politically charged and newsworthy; but association and political debate do not equal victim accusations or proven participation [1] [4]

https://factually.co/fact-checks/justice/epstein-victims-accuse-trump-abuse-ef6f8f

BOTTOM LINE for me: without credible evidence to the contrary, there is NO THERE there. So put up or shut up.

have you ever considered that "the dems" didn't release anything on this when they could have is because these files don't discriminate between republican & democrat/right vs left/however you choose to look at it - there are going to be guilty parties on both sides of the aisle, in board rooms & on stage and screen. basically, whoever had the $$$ for some underage strange...

[DirtyDishSoap]

Llama with actual insight. Someone turn him into the moderator of logic!

[jusplay4fun]

ConfedSS has a point, something I made a while back: If the Dems had anything on Trump, why was such evidence NOT RELEASED

A) in the 2024 election campaign or

B) during the time Biden had access to the Epstein files via the FBI and DOJ?

Please note:

no criminal wrongdoing has ever been established against Trump in connection with Epstein's crimes

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relationship_of_Donald_Trump_and_Jeffrey_Epstein

and

Executive Summary

The evidence assembled in the provided analyses shows no verified instance of a Jeffrey Epstein victim formally accusing Donald Trump of participating in or committing sexual abuse; victims’ statements and memoirs referenced do not directly allege Trump’s involvement (...)

6. Bottom line for readers weighing the claim

Based on the assembled analyses, the correct, evidence‑based conclusion is clear: Victims of Jeffrey Epstein have not, in the provided reporting and memoir excerpts, accused Donald Trump of involvement in Epstein’s abuse. There is documented association and public controversy, and there are continuing questions about the thoroughness of investigations that keep the topic politically charged and newsworthy; but association and political debate do not equal victim accusations or proven participation [1] [4]

https://factually.co/fact-checks/justice/epstein-victims-accuse-trump-abuse-ef6f8f

BOTTOM LINE for me: without credible evidence to the contrary, there is NO THERE there. So put up or shut up.

have you ever considered that "the dems" didn't release anything on this when they could have is because these files don't discriminate between republican & democrat/right vs left/however you choose to look at it - there are going to be guilty parties on both sides of the aisle, in board rooms & on stage and screen. basically, whoever had the $$$ for some underage strange...

Yes, I have. I think (see my comments from July 16, 2025 in this thread) I said there is LOTS TO HURT OTHER DEMS, like The Big (not so beautiful) Bill. Nothing new by the llama. So much insights by llama; he is about 5 months late. Too bad.

[DirtyDishSoap]

Well, cite it then. You sure as shit haven't been making this case now.

[mookiemcgee]

Well, cite it then. You sure as shit haven't been making this case now.

Jusplay only accepts evidence of crimes presented at criminal trials when it comes to republicans, otherwise there is no there, there.... unless it's about Donald Trump and then he also disregards his rape conviction in a court of law as a 'witch hunt'.

I'm sure he would take any claim that Bill is a pedo at face value though.

[jusplay4fun]

Well, cite it then. You sure as shit haven't been making this case now.

I did. Since you challenge me, let me give you the quote and link, BOTH.

As usual, DDS does not know what he is talking about when it comes to me:

Re: Epstein Client List
Postby jusplay4fun on Wed Jul 16, 2025 6:36 pm

I had read YEARS ago that Bill Clinton's name was on a passenger list to fly to "Lolita Island" or "Epstein Island." NO Surprise, since he had been accused of sexual infidelity while still married to Hillary.

I read too, in the past day or so, that Republicans fear any connection with Trump and Epstein, mostly discredited or indications of a friendship at some level YEARS Ago. Democrats fear that Bill Clinton's connections with Epstein will hurt them.

https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=242582

Interesting: on the opening page of this very thread; it seems DDS has a short memory and ignores the facts.