Moderator: Community Team
You cant get more copied and pasted obvious than this...xtratabasco wrote:Every question leads to another question that has not been answered by anyone in authority. This is just the beginning as to why I don’t believe the official “story” and why I want the truth to be told." Link to full statement
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.
Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
GreecePwns wrote:You cant get more copied and pasted obvious than this...xtratabasco wrote:Every question leads to another question that has not been answered by anyone in authority. This is just the beginning as to why I don’t believe the official “story” and why I want the truth to be told." Link to full statement
Iliad wrote:Dude we have shown you pictures. And evidence. And lots of it.
xtratabasco wrote:Iliad wrote:Dude we have shown you pictures. And evidence. And lots of it.
then go collect your million dollars
lol
![]()
![]()
xtratabasco wrote:Statement to this website 8/20/07: "I started questioning the Sept 11, 2001 “story” only days after the event. It just didn’t make any sense to me. How could a steel and concrete building collapse after being hit by a Boeing 767? Didn’t the engineers design it to withstand a direct hit from a Boeing 707, approximately the same size and weight of the 767? The evidence just didn’t add up. ...
unriggable wrote:xtratabasco wrote:Statement to this website 8/20/07: "I started questioning the Sept 11, 2001 “story” only days after the event. It just didn’t make any sense to me. How could a steel and concrete building collapse after being hit by a Boeing 767? Didn’t the engineers design it to withstand a direct hit from a Boeing 707, approximately the same size and weight of the 767? The evidence just didn’t add up. ...
Wikipedia says:
Construction of the World Trade Center's North Tower began in August 1968, and the South Tower in 1969.
You think commercial planes were on their minds when they built the towers? I'm pretty sure that wind was their biggest opponent.
Iliad wrote:unriggable wrote:xtratabasco wrote:Statement to this website 8/20/07: "I started questioning the Sept 11, 2001 “story” only days after the event. It just didn’t make any sense to me. How could a steel and concrete building collapse after being hit by a Boeing 767? Didn’t the engineers design it to withstand a direct hit from a Boeing 707, approximately the same size and weight of the 767? The evidence just didn’t add up. ...
Wikipedia says:
Construction of the World Trade Center's North Tower began in August 1968, and the South Tower in 1969.
You think commercial planes were on their minds when they built the towers? I'm pretty sure that wind was their biggest opponent.
The building actually had been constructed poorly because once the steel became soft all the above floors collapsed onto themselves.
xtratabasco wrote:Iliad wrote:unriggable wrote:xtratabasco wrote:Statement to this website 8/20/07: "I started questioning the Sept 11, 2001 “story” only days after the event. It just didn’t make any sense to me. How could a steel and concrete building collapse after being hit by a Boeing 767? Didn’t the engineers design it to withstand a direct hit from a Boeing 707, approximately the same size and weight of the 767? The evidence just didn’t add up. ...
Wikipedia says:
Construction of the World Trade Center's North Tower began in August 1968, and the South Tower in 1969.
You think commercial planes were on their minds when they built the towers? I'm pretty sure that wind was their biggest opponent.
The building actually had been constructed poorly because once the steel became soft all the above floors collapsed onto themselves.
then why did it come down in less than free fall speed?
xtratabasco wrote:Iliad wrote:unriggable wrote:xtratabasco wrote:Statement to this website 8/20/07: "I started questioning the Sept 11, 2001 “story” only days after the event. It just didn’t make any sense to me. How could a steel and concrete building collapse after being hit by a Boeing 767? Didn’t the engineers design it to withstand a direct hit from a Boeing 707, approximately the same size and weight of the 767? The evidence just didn’t add up. ...
Wikipedia says:
Construction of the World Trade Center's North Tower began in August 1968, and the South Tower in 1969.
You think commercial planes were on their minds when they built the towers? I'm pretty sure that wind was their biggest opponent.
The building actually had been constructed poorly because once the steel became soft all the above floors collapsed onto themselves.
then why did it come down in less than free fall speed?
s.xkitten wrote:xtratabasco wrote:Iliad wrote:unriggable wrote:xtratabasco wrote:Statement to this website 8/20/07: "I started questioning the Sept 11, 2001 “story” only days after the event. It just didn’t make any sense to me. How could a steel and concrete building collapse after being hit by a Boeing 767? Didn’t the engineers design it to withstand a direct hit from a Boeing 707, approximately the same size and weight of the 767? The evidence just didn’t add up. ...
Wikipedia says:
Construction of the World Trade Center's North Tower began in August 1968, and the South Tower in 1969.
You think commercial planes were on their minds when they built the towers? I'm pretty sure that wind was their biggest opponent.
The building actually had been constructed poorly because once the steel became soft all the above floors collapsed onto themselves.
then why did it come down in less than free fall speed?
because the steel was softened, not destroyed completely...it slowed the decent, but it wasn't strong enough to actually hold the floors above it up.
You reak=lized you just contradicted yourself, right? First you said:xtratabasco wrote:s.xkitten wrote:xtratabasco wrote:Iliad wrote:unriggable wrote:xtratabasco wrote:Statement to this website 8/20/07: "I started questioning the Sept 11, 2001 “story” only days after the event. It just didn’t make any sense to me. How could a steel and concrete building collapse after being hit by a Boeing 767? Didn’t the engineers design it to withstand a direct hit from a Boeing 707, approximately the same size and weight of the 767? The evidence just didn’t add up. ...
Wikipedia says:
Construction of the World Trade Center's North Tower began in August 1968, and the South Tower in 1969.
You think commercial planes were on their minds when they built the towers? I'm pretty sure that wind was their biggest opponent.
The building actually had been constructed poorly because once the steel became soft all the above floors collapsed onto themselves.
then why did it come down in less than free fall speed?
because the steel was softened, not destroyed completely...it slowed the decent, but it wasn't strong enough to actually hold the floors above it up.
why did the building fall faster than free fall speed???
because it was pulled with explosives.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=2wpPb3dWARk
And now you say it fell faster then freefall. Will you make up your mind on what you believe at least?xtratabasco wrote:then why did it come down in less than free fall speed?
xtratabasco wrote:
xtratabasco wrote:s.xkitten wrote:xtratabasco wrote:Iliad wrote:unriggable wrote:xtratabasco wrote:Statement to this website 8/20/07: "I started questioning the Sept 11, 2001 “story” only days after the event. It just didn’t make any sense to me. How could a steel and concrete building collapse after being hit by a Boeing 767? Didn’t the engineers design it to withstand a direct hit from a Boeing 707, approximately the same size and weight of the 767? The evidence just didn’t add up. ...
Wikipedia says:
Construction of the World Trade Center's North Tower began in August 1968, and the South Tower in 1969.
You think commercial planes were on their minds when they built the towers? I'm pretty sure that wind was their biggest opponent.
The building actually had been constructed poorly because once the steel became soft all the above floors collapsed onto themselves.
then why did it come down in less than free fall speed?
because the steel was softened, not destroyed completely...it slowed the decent, but it wasn't strong enough to actually hold the floors above it up.
why did the building fall faster than free fall speed???
because it was pulled with explosives.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=2wpPb3dWARk
xtratabasco wrote:I just want you to show the pictures of the damaged boeing 757 that this government says hit the pentagon.
common try it.......
lol
will get to the other areas in a different thread
Iliad wrote:xtratabasco wrote:I just want you to show the pictures of the damaged boeing 757 that this government says hit the pentagon.
common try it.......
lol
will get to the other areas in a different thread
Dude the plane crashed!!! Planes don't survive that! Can't you realise that all that was left of the plane was debris?
xtratabasco wrote:Iliad wrote:xtratabasco wrote:I just want you to show the pictures of the damaged boeing 757 that this government says hit the pentagon.
common try it.......
lol
will get to the other areas in a different thread
Dude the plane crashed!!! Planes don't survive that! Can't you realise that all that was left of the plane was debris?
this government says it vaporized.
but me, this guy and 43% of the people dont believe them.
Robin Hordon – Former FAA Air Traffic Controller at the Boston Air Route Traffic Control Center, located in Nashua, NH, 1970 - 1981. Former Certified Commercial Pilot. Former Certified Flight Instructor and Certified Ground Instructor.
* Statement to this website 4/10/07: "I knew within hours of the attacks on 9/11/2001 that it was an inside job. Based on my 11-year experience as an FAA Air Traffic Controller in the busy Northeast corridor, including hundreds of hours of training, briefings, air refuelings, low altitude bombing drills, being part of huge military exercises, daily military training exercises, interacting on a routine basis directly with NORAD radar personnel, and based on my own direct experience dealing with in-flight emergency situations, including two instances of hijacked commercial airliners, I state unequivocally; There is absolutely no way that four large commercial airliners could have flown around off course for 30 to 60 minutes on 9/11 without being intercepted and shot completely out of the sky by our jet fighters unless very highly placed people in our government and our military wanted it to happen.
It is important for people to understand that scrambling jet fighters to intercept aircraft showing the signs of experiencing "IN-FLIGHT EMERGENCIES" such as going off course without authorization, losing a transponder signal and/or losing radio contact is a common and routine task executed jointly between the FAA and NORAD controllers. The entire "national defense-first responder" intercept system has many highly-trained civilian and military personnel who are committed and well-trained to this task. FAA and NORAD continuously monitor our skies and fighter planes and pilots are on the ready 24/7 to handle these situations. Jet fighters typically intercept any suspect plane over the United States within 10 - 15 minutes of notification of a problem.
This type of "immediate, high speed, high priority and emergency" scramble had been happening regularly approximately 75 - 150 times per year for ten years. ...
I believe that 9/11 was what is known as a "False Flag Operation" in which a country inflicts casualties upon itself, and then blames it on an enemy that they want to go to war against. It is one more instance in the United States’ long history of using "False Flag Operations" and blatant propaganda to ramp-up hostile emotions towards an enemy in a population otherwise resistant to going to war." Link to full statement and expanded bio
just show us the pics
or dont
![]()
Iliad wrote:xtratabasco wrote:Iliad wrote:xtratabasco wrote:I just want you to show the pictures of the damaged boeing 757 that this government says hit the pentagon.
common try it.......
lol
will get to the other areas in a different thread
Dude the plane crashed!!! Planes don't survive that! Can't you realise that all that was left of the plane was debris?
this government says it vaporized.
but me, this guy and 43% of the people dont believe them.
Robin Hordon – Former FAA Air Traffic Controller at the Boston Air Route Traffic Control Center, located in Nashua, NH, 1970 - 1981. Former Certified Commercial Pilot. Former Certified Flight Instructor and Certified Ground Instructor.
* Statement to this website 4/10/07: "I knew within hours of the attacks on 9/11/2001 that it was an inside job. Based on my 11-year experience as an FAA Air Traffic Controller in the busy Northeast corridor, including hundreds of hours of training, briefings, air refuelings, low altitude bombing drills, being part of huge military exercises, daily military training exercises, interacting on a routine basis directly with NORAD radar personnel, and based on my own direct experience dealing with in-flight emergency situations, including two instances of hijacked commercial airliners, I state unequivocally; There is absolutely no way that four large commercial airliners could have flown around off course for 30 to 60 minutes on 9/11 without being intercepted and shot completely out of the sky by our jet fighters unless very highly placed people in our government and our military wanted it to happen.
It is important for people to understand that scrambling jet fighters to intercept aircraft showing the signs of experiencing "IN-FLIGHT EMERGENCIES" such as going off course without authorization, losing a transponder signal and/or losing radio contact is a common and routine task executed jointly between the FAA and NORAD controllers. The entire "national defense-first responder" intercept system has many highly-trained civilian and military personnel who are committed and well-trained to this task. FAA and NORAD continuously monitor our skies and fighter planes and pilots are on the ready 24/7 to handle these situations. Jet fighters typically intercept any suspect plane over the United States within 10 - 15 minutes of notification of a problem.
This type of "immediate, high speed, high priority and emergency" scramble had been happening regularly approximately 75 - 150 times per year for ten years. ...
I believe that 9/11 was what is known as a "False Flag Operation" in which a country inflicts casualties upon itself, and then blames it on an enemy that they want to go to war against. It is one more instance in the United States’ long history of using "False Flag Operations" and blatant propaganda to ramp-up hostile emotions towards an enemy in a population otherwise resistant to going to war." Link to full statement and expanded bio
just show us the pics
or dont
![]()
DUDE FUCKING RED THIS! GIVE YOUR OWN EVIDENCE AND STOP QUOTING RANDOM RETARDS!!!
xtratabasco wrote:was one of these guys the ones that flew the boeing 757 that hit the pentagon and vaporized?
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=ylNgK8k2kt8
lol![]()
Users browsing this forum: No registered users