Huh? I'm not denying my contributions, just saying it's part of the package.
Moderator: Community Team
Army of GOD wrote:Since when is it a crime to post Nirvana lyrics?
Bruceswar » Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:59 pm wrote:We all had tons of men..
Bruceswar » Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:59 pm wrote:We all had tons of men..
Funkyterrance wrote:Nobody is getting banned right? Isn't that the point of this thread or is it the thread being locked or is it a rally against the objection to spam in the first place? Why all this hubbub when pimpdave gets banned for more or less the same thing? If you prick him does he not bleed?
Lets get rid of all the rules. What's the point in any of them anyway? I want to start flaming at will, necro bumping up a storm and spamming to all get out. It could be fun! Honestly I'd rather have no-holds barred than partiality. Anything less than obviously equal treatment just looks bad. It's fced up how certain players get silenced for "bad behavior".
I've been obeying the rules more or less all this time for what? I've watched people get reprimanded for the stupidest petty shit now I'm seeing a really relaxed reaction to this particular case. Make up your minds? If we are going to say fc the rules, why not go all out?
BigBallinStalin wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:Nobody is getting banned right? Isn't that the point of this thread or is it the thread being locked or is it a rally against the objection to spam in the first place? Why all this hubbub when pimpdave gets banned for more or less the same thing? If you prick him does he not bleed?
Lets get rid of all the rules. What's the point in any of them anyway? I want to start flaming at will, necro bumping up a storm and spamming to all get out. It could be fun! Honestly I'd rather have no-holds barred than partiality. Anything less than obviously equal treatment just looks bad. It's fced up how certain players get silenced for "bad behavior".
I've been obeying the rules more or less all this time for what? I've watched people get reprimanded for the stupidest petty shit now I'm seeing a really relaxed reaction to this particular case. Make up your minds? If we are going to say fc the rules, why not go all out?
Good luck finding local support.
Funkyterrance wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:Nobody is getting banned right? Isn't that the point of this thread or is it the thread being locked or is it a rally against the objection to spam in the first place? Why all this hubbub when pimpdave gets banned for more or less the same thing? If you prick him does he not bleed?
Lets get rid of all the rules. What's the point in any of them anyway? I want to start flaming at will, necro bumping up a storm and spamming to all get out. It could be fun! Honestly I'd rather have no-holds barred than partiality. Anything less than obviously equal treatment just looks bad. It's fced up how certain players get silenced for "bad behavior".
I've been obeying the rules more or less all this time for what? I've watched people get reprimanded for the stupidest petty shit now I'm seeing a really relaxed reaction to this particular case. Make up your minds? If we are going to say fc the rules, why not go all out?
Good luck finding local support.
Damn, I figured I could count on you at least BBS.
kentington wrote:We are not saying forget the rules.
When was pimpdave banned for necro-bumping?
Funkyterrance wrote:kentington wrote:We are not saying forget the rules.
When was pimpdave banned for necro-bumping?
Hmm...
Well, he wasn't banned for necro-bumping but neither will Aog be. Pimpdave got banned for excessive spam right? His tea-party thingies. If you take the sum total of Pimpdave's spam threads and that of Aog's five million 2 and 3 word spam posts wouldn't we have just about a balanced scale? Pimpdave's relative harmlessness seems about on par with Aog's and I don't condone bans tbh but it just is hard for us players to see the system in place at times like these. I understand that mods, etc. are obligated to respond to what is reported and don't necessarily have any preferences but sometimes it's just difficult to watch two equally naughty children, one romping the hallways while the other sits in the corner.
Bruceswar » Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:59 pm wrote:We all had tons of men..
xeno wrote:Can someone tell me why I was banned and had to pay 25 fucking dollars to play online risk again????
nietzsche wrote:xeno wrote:Can someone tell me why I was banned and had to pay 25 fucking dollars to play online risk again????
you are multies with tdans.
xeno wrote:nietzsche wrote:xeno wrote:Can someone tell me why I was banned and had to pay 25 fucking dollars to play online risk again????
you are multies with tdans.
I wish! That mans pectorals are like omfggg
xeno wrote:It just irks me because I've mostly kept up my same shenanigans I've been doing the past couple years and I'm banned randomly. I called a cook a c*** but other than that I can't think of what I've done..
nietzsche wrote:xeno wrote:It just irks me because I've mostly kept up my same shenanigans I've been doing the past couple years and I'm banned randomly. I called a cook a c*** but other than that I can't think of what I've done..
That seems to be the reason, you were banned 2 minutes after doing that....
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=12333491
seems a little too harsh..
maybe kgreen is banging El_Jefe or blowing rds.
xeno wrote:Can someone tell me why I was banned and had to pay 25 fucking dollars to play online risk again????
Bruceswar » Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:59 pm wrote:We all had tons of men..
nietzsche wrote:seems to be 9 hours after it not 2 minutes, don't know where i got 2 minutes from.
kentington wrote:xeno wrote:Can someone tell me why I was banned and had to pay 25 fucking dollars to play online risk again????
Are you really wanting to know or just pandering pity?
If you really are unsure I can post the reason here or I can pm them to you.
Looking through the record though the rules you chose to break were the same one every infraction.
xeno wrote:kentington wrote:xeno wrote:Can someone tell me why I was banned and had to pay 25 fucking dollars to play online risk again????
Are you really wanting to know or just pandering pity?
If you really are unsure I can post the reason here or I can pm them to you.
Looking through the record though the rules you chose to break were the same one every infraction.
Pandering pity?
Bruceswar » Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:59 pm wrote:We all had tons of men..
Army of GOD wrote:I joined this game because it's so similar to Call of Duty.
Funkyterrance wrote:Nobody is getting banned right? Isn't that the point of this thread or is it the thread being locked or is it a rally against the objection to spam in the first place? Why all this hubbub when pimpdave gets banned for more or less the same thing? If you prick him does he not bleed?
Lets get rid of all the rules. What's the point in any of them anyway? I want to start flaming at will, necro bumping up a storm and spamming to all get out. It could be fun! Honestly I'd rather have no-holds barred than partiality. Anything less than obviously equal treatment just looks bad. It's fced up how certain players get silenced for "bad behavior".
I've been obeying the rules more or less all this time for what? I've watched people get reprimanded for the stupidest petty shit now I'm seeing a really relaxed reaction to this particular case. Make up your minds? If we are going to say fc the rules, why not go all out?
kentington wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:kentington wrote:We are not saying forget the rules.
When was pimpdave banned for necro-bumping?
Hmm...
Well, he wasn't banned for necro-bumping but neither will Aog be. Pimpdave got banned for excessive spam right? His tea-party thingies. If you take the sum total of Pimpdave's spam threads and that of Aog's five million 2 and 3 word spam posts wouldn't we have just about a balanced scale? Pimpdave's relative harmlessness seems about on par with Aog's and I don't condone bans tbh but it just is hard for us players to see the system in place at times like these. I understand that mods, etc. are obligated to respond to what is reported and don't necessarily have any preferences but sometimes it's just difficult to watch two equally naughty children, one romping the hallways while the other sits in the corner.
I understand the desire for clarity.
I think the ban for all of those threads was before I was a mod. I will state the difference clearly. By creating a ton of threads about the same thing, regardless of substance, pushes all of the other threads down. Causing annoyance and what not. This isn't allowed in the chat either. That is spam.
AoG more or less posts in topics that discussions are ongoing. This necro is the first I have seen from him and even though it seemed random it actually had a purpose. A good one? I don't know, but some purpose.
We are also under new management, so we are trying to continually gauge and adapt to this new flow. I have been as candid as I can with all of you and I try to give good explanations. If you don't think they are clear let me know. If I don't know the answer, or my answer isn't satisfactory, then I will ask above me.
webster wrote:spam: unsolicited usually commercial e-mail sent to a large number of addresses
Users browsing this forum: mookiemcgee