Conquer Club

lies, lies...

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: lies, lies...

Postby Endgame422 on Fri Feb 20, 2015 12:20 pm

Oneyed wrote:
AndyDufresne wrote:
GoranZ wrote:
AndyDufresne wrote:Putin isn't silly enough to actually invade a NATO country.


--Andy

If the West fails to economically break Russia, Putin will hold strong hands vs NATO in Baltic countries. So the question is: "Will NATO/US risk nuclear war?".
The interesting observation is that in case of nuclear war atm Russia has better offensive and defensive capabilities.

Putin isn't silly enough. It's pretty that simple.


--Andy


so Bush older, Bush younger and Obama are enough silly to made war in five countries? are they enough silly for you?

Oneyed

I do believe Andy's correct here.
Although using silly does not really illustrate it well.
The value of the Baltic states to Russia vs the cost of nuclear war to Russia just does not make sense.
I mean Estonia Latvias and Lithuania combined economy is roughly equal to 1 percent of Russia's gdp.
Putin is no fool.
If nuclear war is really a possible response by NATO i doubt Putin(or any person of sense) will take that lightly.
If russia gains anything in the Baltic region it will be subversive like the Ukraine,not a straight up invasion/subjugation.
User avatar
Lieutenant Endgame422
 
Posts: 496
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 2:35 pm
Location: Colorado

Re: lies, lies...

Postby Oneyed on Fri Feb 20, 2015 12:56 pm

AndyDufresne wrote:
Oneyed wrote:
AndyDufresne wrote:
GoranZ wrote:
AndyDufresne wrote:Putin isn't silly enough to actually invade a NATO country.


--Andy

If the West fails to economically break Russia, Putin will hold strong hands vs NATO in Baltic countries. So the question is: "Will NATO/US risk nuclear war?".
The interesting observation is that in case of nuclear war atm Russia has better offensive and defensive capabilities.

Putin isn't silly enough. It's pretty that simple.


--Andy


so Bush older, Bush younger and Obama are enough silly to made war in five countries? are they enough silly for you?

Oneyed

They didn't make nuclear war. That is what my comment was referring to. Putin isn't silly enough to risk nuclear war. Most world leaders aren't. Is that silly enough for you?


--Andy


and did Putin nuclear war? or does Putin prepare nuclear war? if somebody spoke about nuclear war it is "western" politicans.
and if world is near to war it is because US politics. in Iraq (all world now know that Bush lies about chemical arms), in Afghanistan (where mujahedeens were "established" by USA during war against USSR), in Libya, in Syria, in Ukraine.
and I do not say that Russia is good and USA bad, but realy its US politics which could bring world to war.

Oneyed
User avatar
Private 1st Class Oneyed
 
Posts: 1058
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 12:29 pm

Re: lies, lies...

Postby AndyDufresne on Fri Feb 20, 2015 1:35 pm

Oneyed wrote:
AndyDufresne wrote:
Oneyed wrote:
AndyDufresne wrote:
GoranZ wrote:
AndyDufresne wrote:Putin isn't silly enough to actually invade a NATO country.


--Andy

If the West fails to economically break Russia, Putin will hold strong hands vs NATO in Baltic countries. So the question is: "Will NATO/US risk nuclear war?".
The interesting observation is that in case of nuclear war atm Russia has better offensive and defensive capabilities.

Putin isn't silly enough. It's pretty that simple.


--Andy


so Bush older, Bush younger and Obama are enough silly to made war in five countries? are they enough silly for you?

Oneyed

They didn't make nuclear war. That is what my comment was referring to. Putin isn't silly enough to risk nuclear war. Most world leaders aren't. Is that silly enough for you?


--Andy


and did Putin nuclear war? or does Putin prepare nuclear war? if somebody spoke about nuclear war it is "western" politicans.
and if world is near to war it is because US politics. in Iraq (all world now know that Bush lies about chemical arms), in Afghanistan (where mujahedeens were "established" by USA during war against USSR), in Libya, in Syria, in Ukraine.
and I do not say that Russia is good and USA bad, but realy its US politics which could bring world to war.

Oneyed

Listen, I don't think you understand me, and that's fine. I didn't bring up nuclear war, you brought it up in your comment and I was just replying none of the current players are silly enough to go to nuclear war. :D


--Andy
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class AndyDufresne
 
Posts: 24935
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo

Re: lies, lies...

Postby Oneyed on Fri Feb 20, 2015 2:16 pm

AndyDufresne wrote:They didn't make nuclear war. That is what my comment was referring to. Putin isn't silly enough to risk nuclear war. Most world leaders aren't. Is that silly enough for you?


--Andy


this is the first time when nuclear war was mentioned. and it was by you.
AndyDufresne wrote:Listen, I don't think you understand me, and that's fine. I didn't bring up nuclear war, you brought it up in your comment and I was just replying none of the current players are silly enough to go to nuclear war. :D


--Andy


so it looks that you do not understand anything. it is also why you have no arguments about other things mentioned here. you just repeat about nuclear war. which you mentioned as the first.

Oneyed
User avatar
Private 1st Class Oneyed
 
Posts: 1058
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 12:29 pm

Re: lies, lies...

Postby GoranZ on Fri Feb 20, 2015 6:54 pm

Endgame422 wrote:
Oneyed wrote:
AndyDufresne wrote:
GoranZ wrote:
AndyDufresne wrote:Putin isn't silly enough to actually invade a NATO country.


--Andy

If the West fails to economically break Russia, Putin will hold strong hands vs NATO in Baltic countries. So the question is: "Will NATO/US risk nuclear war?".
The interesting observation is that in case of nuclear war atm Russia has better offensive and defensive capabilities.

Putin isn't silly enough. It's pretty that simple.


--Andy


so Bush older, Bush younger and Obama are enough silly to made war in five countries? are they enough silly for you?

Oneyed

I do believe Andy's correct here.
Although using silly does not really illustrate it well.
The value of the Baltic states to Russia vs the cost of nuclear war to Russia just does not make sense.
I mean Estonia Latvias and Lithuania combined economy is roughly equal to 1 percent of Russia's gdp.
Putin is no fool.
If nuclear war is really a possible response by NATO i doubt Putin(or any person of sense) will take that lightly.
If russia gains anything in the Baltic region it will be subversive like the Ukraine,not a straight up invasion/subjugation.

Talking with monkey andy is virtually useless...
Being prepared to use nuclear weapons is more then enough for Russia. Indeed Russia will not directly invade Baltic states but its goal will be to stop NATO from intervention. Bargaining chip will be the nukes. I presume something will also be happening in Far East in the same time.
Even a little kid knows whats the name of my country... http://youtu.be/XFxjy7f9RpY

Interested in clans? Check out the Fallen!
Brigadier GoranZ
 
Posts: 2917
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 3:14 pm

Re: lies, lies...

Postby DoomYoshi on Fri Feb 20, 2015 7:58 pm

If a nation wants to buy drones from the United States, it must follow these 4 principles:


“Recipients are to use these systems in accordance with international law, including international humanitarian law and international human rights law, as applicable;

Armed and other advanced [unmanned aircraft systems] UAS are to be used in operations involving the use of force only when there is a lawful basis for use of force under international law, such as national self-defense;

Recipients are not to use military UAS to conduct unlawful surveillance or use unlawful force against their domestic populations; and

As appropriate, recipients shall provide UAS operators technical and doctrinal training on the use of these systems to reduce the risk of unintended injury or damage.”


None of those 4 principles are followed by the United States though.
░▒▒▓▓▓▒▒░
User avatar
Captain DoomYoshi
 
Posts: 10728
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 9:30 pm
Location: Niu York, Ukraine

Re: lies, lies...

Postby Endgame422 on Sat Feb 21, 2015 2:31 am

GoranZ wrote:Talking with monkey andy is virtually useless...
Being prepared to use nuclear weapons is more then enough for Russia. Indeed Russia will not directly invade Baltic states but its goal will be to stop NATO from intervention. Bargaining chip will be the nukes. I presume something will also be happening in Far East in the same time.

Honestly my knowledge of russian politics is fairly limited but wouldnt most of russias citizens be FURIOUS if putin used nuclear war as a bargaining chip?
Especially since the gain to be had is fairly small, it seems to me like that would undermine putins support base,expend quite a bit of resource(at least in the shortterm), and increase international sanctions/pressure on russia.
If im way off base here let me know but nuclear war just seems like its too heavy to bargain with.
And im interested to hear what you anticipate with the far east as well if you dont mind.
User avatar
Lieutenant Endgame422
 
Posts: 496
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 2:35 pm
Location: Colorado

Re: lies, lies...

Postby GoranZ on Sun Feb 22, 2015 6:32 pm

Endgame422 wrote:
GoranZ wrote:Talking with monkey andy is virtually useless...
Being prepared to use nuclear weapons is more then enough for Russia. Indeed Russia will not directly invade Baltic states but its goal will be to stop NATO from intervention. Bargaining chip will be the nukes. I presume something will also be happening in Far East in the same time.

Honestly my knowledge of russian politics is fairly limited but wouldnt most of russias citizens be FURIOUS if putin used nuclear war as a bargaining chip?
Especially since the gain to be had is fairly small, it seems to me like that would undermine putins support base,expend quite a bit of resource(at least in the shortterm), and increase international sanctions/pressure on russia.
If im way off base here let me know but nuclear war just seems like its too heavy to bargain with.

If we exclude the Baltic countries every other NATO country has less to gain at keeping the situation as it is... There is large percent of Russians living in the Baltic countries but their basic human rights are broken on daily basis... Its a question how much normal American(or anyone else from Western Europe) will be willing to risk of being burned by nuclear weapons for Latvia or Estonia. I bet over 90% of Americans dont even know where are Latvia or Estonia :D. So as American what you gain for keeping repressed Russians in the Baltic Countries, and how far would you go to keep that situation as it is?

Endgame422 wrote:And im interested to hear what you anticipate with the far east as well if you dont mind.

Some Far East Country is building carriers, expanding its army, trying to ensure reliable resource base... Dominance in the far East region is just first step, but that fist step must be taken eventually.
Even a little kid knows whats the name of my country... http://youtu.be/XFxjy7f9RpY

Interested in clans? Check out the Fallen!
Brigadier GoranZ
 
Posts: 2917
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 3:14 pm

Re: lies, lies...

Postby muy_thaiguy on Sun Feb 22, 2015 9:03 pm

If I may ask, how are the Russian's basic human rights, who live in the Baltic countries, "broken on a daily basis"?
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
User avatar
Private 1st Class muy_thaiguy
 
Posts: 12746
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
Location: Back in Black

Re: lies, lies...

Postby GoranZ on Mon Feb 23, 2015 6:39 am

muy_thaiguy wrote:If I may ask, how are the , who live in the Baltic countries, "broken on a daily basis"?

You know nothing about Russian's basic human rights in Baltic countries yet you portrait them as demons.
At first you need to know at least something about the other side before you start a conversation. That is if you want to have a conversation.
Even a little kid knows whats the name of my country... http://youtu.be/XFxjy7f9RpY

Interested in clans? Check out the Fallen!
Brigadier GoranZ
 
Posts: 2917
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 3:14 pm

Re: lies, lies...

Postby waauw on Mon Feb 23, 2015 7:26 am

GoranZ wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:If I may ask, how are the , who live in the Baltic countries, "broken on a daily basis"?

You know nothing about Russian's basic human rights in Baltic countries yet you portrait them as demons.
At first you need to know at least something about the other side before you start a conversation. That is if you want to have a conversation.


I'm assuming you're referring to the ignored referendum in Estonia?
User avatar
Lieutenant waauw
 
Posts: 4756
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:46 pm

Re: lies, lies...

Postby saxitoxin on Mon Feb 23, 2015 7:45 am

Endgame422 wrote:The value of the Baltic states to Russia vs the cost of nuclear war to Russia just does not make sense.


Isn't the opposite also true?

The value of the Baltic states to NATO vs the cost of nuclear war to NATO does not make sense. If Russia decided to remove the corrupt drunks in Tallin tomorrow, would San Francisco and Chicago really be okay getting flattened in a nuclear strike to preserve the honor of a silly little country like Estonia?

No colonial power has ever risked an attack on its homeland to maintain its colonies. The U.S. will do whatever it takes to defend its European colonies as long as U.S. territory isn't put at risk. If there's any risk to North America, the U.S. will probably back down.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
User avatar
Corporal saxitoxin
 
Posts: 13409
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am

Re: lies, lies...

Postby Dukasaur on Mon Feb 23, 2015 8:40 am

saxitoxin wrote:
Endgame422 wrote:The value of the Baltic states to Russia vs the cost of nuclear war to Russia just does not make sense.


Isn't the opposite also true?

The value of the Baltic states to NATO vs the cost of nuclear war to NATO does not make sense. If Russia decided to remove the corrupt drunks in Tallin tomorrow, would San Francisco and Chicago really be okay getting flattened in a nuclear strike to preserve the honor of a silly little country like Estonia?

In the past 10 years, Estonia's Freedom House rating has gone from a 2 to a 1. In the same period, Russia's FH rating has declined from a 5 to a 6.
(Source: https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/freedom-world-2015#.VOssPiytHRU)

I do not know if the corrupt drunks in Washington would exert themselves to save the corrupt drunks in Talinn from the corrupt drunks in Moscow. I do know that the event you hypothesize would be a sad event.
“‎Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.”
― Voltaire
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Dukasaur
Community Team
Community Team
 
Posts: 28152
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara
32

Re: lies, lies...

Postby GoranZ on Mon Feb 23, 2015 9:47 am

Dukasaur wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:
Endgame422 wrote:The value of the Baltic states to Russia vs the cost of nuclear war to Russia just does not make sense.


Isn't the opposite also true?

The value of the Baltic states to NATO vs the cost of nuclear war to NATO does not make sense. If Russia decided to remove the corrupt drunks in Tallin tomorrow, would San Francisco and Chicago really be okay getting flattened in a nuclear strike to preserve the honor of a silly little country like Estonia?

In the past 10 years, Estonia's Freedom House rating has gone from a 2 to a 1. In the same period, Russia's FH rating has declined from a 5 to a 6.
(Source: https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/freedom-world-2015#.VOssPiytHRU)

I do not know if the corrupt drunks in Washington would exert themselves to save the corrupt drunks in Talinn from the corrupt drunks in Moscow. I do know that the event you hypothesize would be a sad event.

That is according to Western standards... For example 30% of Estonian population are ethnic Russians, percentage of Russian speakers(used at home) is even higher, in the capital Talinn half of the population use the Russian language as their native language. Towns east from Talinn have up to 80% Russian population. And those 30% ethnic Russians dont have rights to vote. I presume FsH(aka Freedom shit House) only monitors the voters, and not the whole population.
Ukraine has improvement from 3.5(2014) to 3(2015), although the country is in the middle of civil war, and half of the population is opposing the government(but they are not allowed to say it publicly).
Except few western media, I dont think that anyone is putting any weight on Freedom shit House rating.

BTW this is the schema that West is using for dominance, on which Russia said NO MORE.
1. Pick a state and declare its government as corrupted.
2. Declare that the state is not fulfilling the rights of the gay population(westerns favorite) and for different ethnic and religious populations. FsH rating.
3. Declare local terrorists as freedom fighters.
4. Implement economical sanctions in order for the general population to suffer as much as possible.
5. Good media coverage for "braking of the rules".
6. Declare elections as fabricated in order to install puppet government(multiple times in Ukraine).
7. Make "peace mission", "liberation" or "humanitarian mission" in the country.
8. Collect all resources from the country and announce it as foreign investment or simply reconstruction.

saxitoxin wrote:The U.S. will do whatever it takes to defend its European colonies as long as U.S. territory isn't put at risk. If there's any risk to North America, the U.S. will probably back down.

Or probably make an arrangement like with Cuba. This is the outcome I expect, and probably what Putin want to achieve.
Even a little kid knows whats the name of my country... http://youtu.be/XFxjy7f9RpY

Interested in clans? Check out the Fallen!
Brigadier GoranZ
 
Posts: 2917
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 3:14 pm

Re: lies, lies...

Postby saxitoxin on Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:05 am

Dukasaur wrote:In the past 10 years, Estonia's Freedom House rating


Noam Chomsky has some choice words about the U.S. regime's so-called "Freedom House."
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
User avatar
Corporal saxitoxin
 
Posts: 13409
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am

Re: lies, lies...

Postby Dukasaur on Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:09 am

saxitoxin wrote:
Dukasaur wrote:In the past 10 years, Estonia's Freedom House rating


Noam Chomsky has some choice words about the U.S. regime's so-called "Freedom House."

I actually like Noam Chomsky, but he's still wrong about a lot of things.
“‎Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.”
― Voltaire
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Dukasaur
Community Team
Community Team
 
Posts: 28152
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara
32

Re: lies, lies...

Postby saxitoxin on Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:24 am

It's [Freedom House] election monitors also found the Salvadoran elections of 1982 "admirable."

https://books.google.com/books?id=18IWX ... 20&f=false


Electoral Commission president Armando Rodriguez Equizabal claims that ''more'' than 25 percent of the votes counted in the 1982 contest were fraudulent. Other members on the commission estimate fraudulent votes ranged from 15 to 25 percent of the count.

http://www.csmonitor.com/1984/0307/030750.html
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
User avatar
Corporal saxitoxin
 
Posts: 13409
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am

Re: lies, lies...

Postby Dukasaur on Mon Feb 23, 2015 11:25 am

If you consider Freedom House too biased (admittedly, their bias tends to be strong) here's what the Economist's ratings have to say:
Estonia overall rating 7.61, with an 8.82 in civil liberties
Russia overall rating 3.74, with 4.41 in civil liberties

http://pages.eiu.com/rs/eiu2/images/Democracy-Index-2012.pdf
“‎Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.”
― Voltaire
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Dukasaur
Community Team
Community Team
 
Posts: 28152
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara
32

Re: lies, lies...

Postby Oneyed on Mon Feb 23, 2015 12:44 pm

.........
Last edited by Oneyed on Mon Feb 23, 2015 12:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Private 1st Class Oneyed
 
Posts: 1058
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 12:29 pm

Re: lies, lies...

Postby Endgame422 on Mon Feb 23, 2015 12:45 pm

saxitoxin wrote:
Endgame422 wrote:The value of the Baltic states to Russia vs the cost of nuclear war to Russia just does not make sense.


Isn't the opposite also true?

The value of the Baltic states to NATO vs the cost of nuclear war to NATO does not make sense. If Russia decided to remove the corrupt drunks in Tallin tomorrow, would San Francisco and Chicago really be okay getting flattened in a nuclear strike to preserve the honor of a silly little country like Estonia?

No colonial power has ever risked an attack on its homeland to maintain its colonies. The U.S. will do whatever it takes to defend its European colonies as long as U.S. territory isn't put at risk. If there's any risk to North America, the U.S. will probably back down.

Of course the opposite is true.
But goranz brought nuclear war into the picture saying putin would likely use it as a bargaining tactic,which makes russia the aggressor here.
The west is probably taking advantage of the Baltic people but they are not doing it militarily,just economically/politically.
Im not defending nato or the wests policy of economic imperialism here i just cant believe anyone(russia,nato) would risk nuclear war over the baltics.
Maybe an old fashioned proxy war/civil war like the ukraine but nuclear war between nato and russia means everyone suffers.
Perhaps putin is willing to gamble like that or maybe he thinks he could "win" a nuclear war vs NATO but that just seems like a big mess at best and humanities extinction event at worst.
Even if it's just an empty threat, stirring American fears about another cold war is bad news for everyone.
I guess time will tell.
User avatar
Lieutenant Endgame422
 
Posts: 496
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 2:35 pm
Location: Colorado

Re: lies, lies...

Postby DoomYoshi on Mon Feb 23, 2015 2:13 pm

The only time Estonia was free was when the Huns were there.
#BarbarianOverlord
░▒▒▓▓▓▒▒░
User avatar
Captain DoomYoshi
 
Posts: 10728
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 9:30 pm
Location: Niu York, Ukraine

Re: lies, lies...

Postby GoranZ on Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:34 pm

Dukasaur wrote:If you consider Freedom House too biased (admittedly, their bias tends to be strong) here's what the Economist's ratings have to say:
Estonia overall rating 7.61, with an 8.82 in civil liberties
Russia overall rating 3.74, with 4.41 in civil liberties

http://pages.eiu.com/rs/eiu2/images/Democracy-Index-2012.pdf

Economist, same shit different package :lol:
As I previously said many parameters are excluded in order to "fix" the results.
Greece has better rating then Estonia :shock:, even when Europeans are basically telling them how to run their country? What kind of liberty is that?

Endgame422 wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:
Endgame422 wrote:The value of the Baltic states to Russia vs the cost of nuclear war to Russia just does not make sense.


Isn't the opposite also true?

The value of the Baltic states to NATO vs the cost of nuclear war to NATO does not make sense. If Russia decided to remove the corrupt drunks in Tallin tomorrow, would San Francisco and Chicago really be okay getting flattened in a nuclear strike to preserve the honor of a silly little country like Estonia?

No colonial power has ever risked an attack on its homeland to maintain its colonies. The U.S. will do whatever it takes to defend its European colonies as long as U.S. territory isn't put at risk. If there's any risk to North America, the U.S. will probably back down.

Of course the opposite is true.
But goranz brought nuclear war into the picture saying putin would likely use it as a bargaining tactic,which makes russia the aggressor here.

Aggressor for some liberator for others... depending how you look at it. For the west Russia will be the aggressor, but for Russians they will be liberators. The one that will win will write the history(as he knows it) ;)
If no one wins(there is no war) we will have two histories as with crusader wars.

Endgame422 wrote:The west is probably taking advantage of the Baltic people but they are not doing it militarily,just economically/politically.
Im not defending nato or the wests policy of economic imperialism here i just cant believe anyone(russia,nato) would risk nuclear war over the baltics.

You are largely mistaking. Baltic states are supported at what they do in every aspect including military one. And it seems military aspect is the only way things are getting solved.
So if nuclear weapons is mentioned negotiations will go smoothly. After all in nuclear weapons both NATO and Russia are at least equal.

Endgame422 wrote:Maybe an old fashioned proxy war/civil war like the ukraine but nuclear war between nato and russia means everyone suffers.
Perhaps putin is willing to gamble like that or maybe he thinks he could "win" a nuclear war vs NATO but that just seems like a big mess at best and humanities extinction event at worst.
Even if it's just an empty threat, stirring American fears about another cold war is bad news for everyone.
I guess time will tell.

The problem is that US is the only country in the world that has ever used nuclear weapons in a war. Thinking that only US is allowed(and get away with it) to use nuclear weapons, as long as they are "liberating" someone or something can only have devastating effects on US. Its up to US if they want to try those effects.
As Putin says... No more colored revolutions. I presume next thing that he can say is "No more sanctions". The problem is when nukes start fly away it will be too late for negotiations.

P.S. When we know that S400 are effective against any conventional weapon, why do you think Russia is manufacturing S500?
Even a little kid knows whats the name of my country... http://youtu.be/XFxjy7f9RpY

Interested in clans? Check out the Fallen!
Brigadier GoranZ
 
Posts: 2917
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 3:14 pm

Re: lies, lies...

Postby muy_thaiguy on Tue Feb 24, 2015 1:15 am

GoranZ wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:If I may ask, how are the , who live in the Baltic countries, "broken on a daily basis"?

You know nothing about Russian's basic human rights in Baltic countries yet you portrait them as demons.
At first you need to know at least something about the other side before you start a conversation. That is if you want to have a conversation.

Chill man. All I did was ask a legitimate question trying to find out what rights the Baltic countries are supposed to be stepping. It was not a loaded question, nor was it meant to antagonize anyone. If all you can do is lash out and put words in my mouth (have never called Russians demons, nor do I ever make such generalizing comments, though I have called Putin psychotic, but that is from a different conversation, and his actions and words portray as much).

I asked a simple question hoping to see what rights, according to the Russians, are being trampled on, nothing more, nothing less. Merely wishing to see your side of this argument. But obviously, that's not going to happen, at least not from you.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
User avatar
Private 1st Class muy_thaiguy
 
Posts: 12746
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
Location: Back in Black

Re: lies, lies...

Postby Oneyed on Tue Feb 24, 2015 1:42 am

muy_thaiguy wrote:
GoranZ wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:If I may ask, how are the , who live in the Baltic countries, "broken on a daily basis"?

You know nothing about Russian's basic human rights in Baltic countries yet you portrait them as demons.
At first you need to know at least something about the other side before you start a conversation. That is if you want to have a conversation.

Chill man. All I did was ask a legitimate question trying to find out what rights the Baltic countries are supposed to be stepping. It was not a loaded question, nor was it meant to antagonize anyone. If all you can do is lash out and put words in my mouth (have never called Russians demons, nor do I ever make such generalizing comments, though I have called Putin psychotic, but that is from a different conversation, and his actions and words portray as much).

I asked a simple question hoping to see what rights, according to the Russians, are being trampled on, nothing more, nothing less. Merely wishing to see your side of this argument. But obviously, that's not going to happen, at least not from you.


I wrote about this before your asked. try to read all comments, not just stupid pictures from AndyDufresne.

Oneyed
User avatar
Private 1st Class Oneyed
 
Posts: 1058
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 12:29 pm

Re: lies, lies...

Postby muy_thaiguy on Tue Feb 24, 2015 2:35 am

Oneyed wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
GoranZ wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:If I may ask, how are the , who live in the Baltic countries, "broken on a daily basis"?

You know nothing about Russian's basic human rights in Baltic countries yet you portrait them as demons.
At first you need to know at least something about the other side before you start a conversation. That is if you want to have a conversation.

Chill man. All I did was ask a legitimate question trying to find out what rights the Baltic countries are supposed to be stepping. It was not a loaded question, nor was it meant to antagonize anyone. If all you can do is lash out and put words in my mouth (have never called Russians demons, nor do I ever make such generalizing comments, though I have called Putin psychotic, but that is from a different conversation, and his actions and words portray as much).

I asked a simple question hoping to see what rights, according to the Russians, are being trampled on, nothing more, nothing less. Merely wishing to see your side of this argument. But obviously, that's not going to happen, at least not from you.


I wrote about this before your asked. try to read all comments, not just stupid pictures from AndyDufresne.

Oneyed

You mean your one sentence about Latvia? And, no, I'm not going to defend them on the whole voting thing and such, but it's not just ethnic Russians that are not allowed to vote. That needed to be said, otherwise you make it look as if it is only Russians that are being persecuted, which is not exactly true.

Or do you mean this little bit here?
if you can speak about past, USSR liberated whole eastern and central europe, this is what you call "basicaly re-invaded". then USA, Great Britain invaded the western europe. or do you try to re-write history?
Which, is basically BS. The Russians conquered countries that were conquered just before them by the Nazis and subjugated nearly all of Eastern Europe for decades. Examples? The Western countries did not build the Berlin wall in Germany. The Western countries did not have gulags where veterans of WWII were sent to, never to be seen again. And yes, the US and UK did invade the beaches of Normandy, to drive out the occupying Nazi troops. And then turned the country back over to the rightful government and got France back to self-rule. Stalin, did not. Also, don't kid yourself. Stalin and Hitler made a mutual pact where both would invade and subjugate Poland, with the USSR to the East and the Nazis to the West. The only reason they did not stay like that is because Hitler got greedy and too aggressive.

Or this thing?
how can you tell this shit? look at your country where you have soldiers and how much countries you occupied. so at the first take your soldiers back (also hidden ones or agents).
do you know that Ukraine was part of Russia to 1954?
We occupy, yes, and then turn the country back over to the people that are from there. We have a large number of troops in South Korea because the US and South Korea are still, legally, at war with North Korea. And let's face it, North Korea is not exactly the most friendly of places.

As for Ukraine, how about this little tidbit?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor
Not to mention that Ukraine also has it's own language and culture. And you wonder why so many former Soviet countries want to distance themselves as much as possible from Russia? And let's not forget Stalin's acts of wiping people out before WWII on the people of Russia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dekulakization

In short, ethnic Russians are FAR from the only people in Lavia being screwed over. But you don't see other countries threatening to invade them.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
User avatar
Private 1st Class muy_thaiguy
 
Posts: 12746
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
Location: Back in Black

PreviousNext

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users