Sanders will increase wealth of ordinary Americans

[Phatscotty]

It's rare indeed when every single citizen in America agrees on something, and this indeed is one of those occasions.

It's a 100% fact that Bernie Sanders will absolutely EXTRACT wealth from ALL Americans.

I think the fear is that, Republicans want keep their contributions pouring in from the rich fat cats. Once we have REAL campaign finance laws...Republicans might start believing in science.

Huffington Post :WASHINGTON (AP) — Republicans are the party of the rich, right? It's a label that has stuck for decades, and you're hearing it again as Democrats complain about GOP opposition to raising the minimum wage and extending unemployment benefits.

But in Congress, the wealthiest among us are more likely to be represented by a Democrat than a Republican. Of the 10 richest House districts, only two have Republican congressmen. Democrats claim the top six, sprinkled along the East and West coasts. Most are in overwhelmingly Democratic states like New York and California.

I absolutely love how Progressives are in the habit of projecting EVERYTHING they are unto the opposing party and then stunningly use that for which to build their base of justified hatred. Such as the science presented by Warmy which is solid as fuk. I easily foresee Bernie rejecting the conclusive truth presented by the study, and then in the same breathe making a statement about how Republicans are the ones who reject factual results of scientific studies. And no doubt the dogmatic zealot will appear right on schedule by denying the fact that Bernie Sanders admitted he regularly benefited his own version of 'real finance reform.... coming from a guy who accepted a great deal of what the fat-cats have been pouring directly into Bernie Sanders pockets by accepting free checking along with all kinds of other perks and special privileges from the big bank rich fat cats he likes to pretend only benefit Republicans.

What a freakin tool!

[jgordon1111]

It's rare indeed when every single citizen in America agrees on something, and this indeed is one of those occasions.

It's a 100% fact that Bernie Sanders will absolutely EXTRACT wealth from ALL Americans.

I think the fear is that, Republicans want keep their contributions pouring in from the rich fat cats. Once we have REAL campaign finance laws...Republicans might start believing in science.

Huffington Post :WASHINGTON (AP) — Republicans are the party of the rich, right? It's a label that has stuck for decades, and you're hearing it again as Democrats complain about GOP opposition to raising the minimum wage and extending unemployment benefits.

But in Congress, the wealthiest among us are more likely to be represented by a Democrat than a Republican. Of the 10 richest House districts, only two have Republican congressmen. Democrats claim the top six, sprinkled along the East and West coasts. Most are in overwhelmingly Democratic states like New York and California.

I absolutely love how Progressives are in the habit of projecting EVERYTHING they are unto the opposing party and then stunningly use that for which to build their base of justified hatred. Such as the science presented by Warmy which is solid as fuk. I easily foresee Bernie rejecting the conclusive truth presented by the study, and then in the same breathe making a statement about how Republicans are the ones who reject factual results of scientific studies. And no doubt the dogmatic zealot will appear right on schedule by denying the fact that Bernie Sanders admitted he regularly benefited his own version of 'real finance reform.... coming from a guy who accepted a great deal of what the fat-cats have been pouring directly into Bernie Sanders pockets by accepting free checking along with all kinds of other perks and special privileges from the big bank rich fat cats he likes to pretend only benefit Republicans.

What a freakin tool!

Scotty, have you watched what Bernie has said about global warming, if he turns around on it,we will know we got f'd again

[Bernie Sanders]

Bernie,

I couldn't disagree more with your worldview regarding culture, economics, or just about anything (maybe we agree on sports a little). However, just looking at the way that the Democrat Party has set up their nominating system with the super-delegates, don't you fear that the deck is stacked against any candidate who won't toe the party line? Your message seems to resonate with the younger voters within your party.

In other words, you could mop up the electoral map state-by-state against Hillary Clinton, and those super-delegates would come in and over-ride the will of the voters during the convention. I think that the super-delegates were first created by the DNC during the 1984 race to ensure that Gary Hart wouldn't be allowed to defeat Walter Mondale, but I could be wrong about that.

The problem with the Democratic side is the super delegates, which has no bearing on popular votes. Clinton split the delegate count 50% to Sanders 50%, even though Sanders had a 22% more votes than Clinton in New Hampshire.

We can only hope as the election for delegates continue, that popular votes will sway some delegates from Clinton.

The system is gamed for DNC establishment candidates aka Hillary Clinton.

[Bernie Sanders]

It's rare indeed when every single citizen in America agrees on something, and this indeed is one of those occasions.

It's a 100% fact that Bernie Sanders will absolutely EXTRACT wealth from ALL Americans.

I think the fear is that, Republicans want keep their contributions pouring in from the rich fat cats. Once we have REAL campaign finance laws...Republicans might start believing in science.

Huffington Post :WASHINGTON (AP) — Republicans are the party of the rich, right? It's a label that has stuck for decades, and you're hearing it again as Democrats complain about GOP opposition to raising the minimum wage and extending unemployment benefits.

But in Congress, the wealthiest among us are more likely to be represented by a Democrat than a Republican. Of the 10 richest House districts, only two have Republican congressmen. Democrats claim the top six, sprinkled along the East and West coasts. Most are in overwhelmingly Democratic states like New York and California.

I absolutely love how Progressives are in the habit of projecting EVERYTHING they are unto the opposing party and then stunningly use that for which to build their base of justified hatred. Such as the science presented by Warmy which is solid as fuk. I easily foresee Bernie rejecting the conclusive truth presented by the study, and then in the same breathe making a statement about how Republicans are the ones who reject factual results of scientific studies. And no doubt the dogmatic zealot will appear right on schedule by denying the fact that Bernie Sanders admitted he regularly benefited his own version of 'real finance reform.... coming from a guy who accepted a great deal of what the fat-cats have been pouring directly into Bernie Sanders pockets by accepting free checking along with all kinds of other perks and special privileges from the big bank rich fat cats he likes to pretend only benefit Republicans.

What a freakin tool!

You should be more concerned about the circus atmosphere of the Republican Party and the candidates running for President. They are so busy calling each other liars, flip-floppers, losers! and even threatening to sue each other.

Yep, I agree with the above comments from these candidates.

[GoranZ]

Free Communist Fried Chicken from Colonel Bernie Sanders

[Phatscotty]

At least we don't have to worry about getting Bernie to admit he is a Socialist.


But we do have to worry about how dishonest people consumed by their greed for other people's money not worrying at all that Bernie Sanders gets perks from big banks. Which means we have to worry about someone who constantly attacks one person for doing something but then on a dime turns into a hypocrite and has no problem at all when their candidate does the exact same things and takes money and perks from big banking. Which means such a person is totally full of shit.

http://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz ... -big-banks

Scandal rocked Bernie Sanders’s Presidential campaign on Friday as the candidate was forced to admit that he received free checking from several big banks.

If you can't be consistent on your own supposed principles, then your speech as expressed here anyways is worth less than nothing and about as much as the extremely dogmatic unscientific as all hell faith based flock of Bernie Sanders who post all day about their guaranteed utopian Socialist fantasies as if they were real time miracles that everyone else is preventing from taking place.

[hotfire]

lol free checking

[Metsfanmax]

http://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz ... -big-banks

Scandal rocked Bernie Sanders’s Presidential campaign on Friday as the candidate was forced to admit that he received free checking from several big banks.

If you can't be consistent on your own supposed principles, then your speech as expressed here anyways is worth less than nothing and about as much as the extremely dogmatic unscientific as all hell faith based flock of Bernie Sanders who post all day about their guaranteed utopian Socialist fantasies as if they were real time miracles that everyone else is preventing from taking place.

...Please, please tell me you were joking here.

[jgordon1111]

Free Communist Fried Chicken from Colonel Bernie Sanders

I believe there is a misunderstanding here, socialist does not automatically mean communist,democratic socialist is not the same as communism, it's like saying muslim is the same as Isis, get the drift? Not all Muslims are part of Isis, just as a democratic socialist is not the same as communism, and if you are going off of the old USSR as your prototype of what is a communist? Lets look close
U union
S Soviet
S socialist
R REPUBLIC
So lets see the republicans own the same title as communists if not more so, but that's not accurate either, get the drift?

[mrswdk]

socialist does not automatically mean communist

In fact, socialist doesn't mean communist at all, because those are two different things.

[tzor]

In fact, socialist doesn't mean communist at all, because those are two different things.

A socialist is a communist with a longer view towards the end game. That's all.

[Bernie Sanders]

socialist does not automatically mean communist

In fact, socialist doesn't mean communist at all, because those are two different things.

Correct and as usual Tzor is just a partisan Republican with fascist views.

[jgordon1111]

In fact, socialist doesn't mean communist at all, because those are two different things.

A socialist is a communist with a longer view towards the end game. That's all.

Ok Tzor before there was even a USSR, the American civil war took place and the North side was defined by a singular word UNION, that made it the Union States of America, of the REPUBLIC for which we stand.So lets look at it a different way now beings we are defining people and groups by words. And that's a bad idea all the way around.
U Union
S Soviet
S Socialist
R REPUBLIC

U Union/United which means basically the same thing
S States
A America
Which is a Democratic REPUBLIC

So with that in mind the GOP are the true communist party of America,beings we are using specific words to define people, no matter what the real definition of what that word really means. Now you are a smart person, so just say you don't like Bernie Sanders and be done with it, name calling belittles your education without proof

[GoranZ]

Free Communist Fried Chicken from Colonel Bernie Sanders

I believe there is a misunderstanding here, socialist does not automatically mean communist,democratic socialist is not the same as communism, it's like saying muslim is the same as Isis, get the drift? Not all Muslims are part of Isis, just as a democratic socialist is not the same as communism, and if you are going off of the old USSR as your prototype of what is a communist? Lets look close
U union
S Soviet
S socialist
R REPUBLIC
So lets see the republicans own the same title as communists if not more so, but that's not accurate either, get the drift?

Both Communist and Socialist are Left wing, one more extreme then the other. Bernie wants to enslave Wall Street, he is extreme

In fact, socialist doesn't mean communist at all, because those are two different things.

A socialist is a communist with a longer view towards the end game. That's all.

Ok Tzor before there was even a USSR, the American civil war took place and the North side was defined by a singular word UNION, that made it the Union States of America, of the REPUBLIC for which we stand.So lets look at it a different way now beings we are defining people and groups by words. And that's a bad idea all the way around.
U Union
S Soviet
S Socialist
R REPUBLIC

U Union/United which means basically the same thing
S States
A America
Which is a Democratic REPUBLIC

So with that in mind the GOP are the true communist party of America,beings we are using specific words to define people, no matter what the real definition of what that word really means. Now you are a smart person, so just say you don't like Bernie Sanders and be done with it, name calling belittles your education without proof

Republicans are Right wing, they have nothing in common with USSR, the term Republic represents a form of government in which there is no monarch, both USSR and USA never had a monarch. Currently, 147 of the world's 206 sovereign states use the word "republic" as part of their official names; not all of these are republics in the sense of having elected governments, nor do all nations with elected governments use the word "republic" in their names.

[Bernie Sanders]

STFU GoranZ.

You are a waste of space and misinformation,.

[GoranZ]

STFU GoranZ.

You are a waste of space and misinformation,.

Bernie's free Stuff, or not as free as he presents them




Here is a chance for you Bernie, enlighten us, where will your candidate get the needed money?

[jgordon1111]

Free Communist Fried Chicken from Colonel Bernie Sanders

I believe there is a misunderstanding here, socialist does not automatically mean communist,democratic socialist is not the same as communism, it's like saying muslim is the same as Isis, get the drift? Not all Muslims are part of Isis, just as a democratic socialist is not the same as communism, and if you are going off of the old USSR as your prototype of what is a communist? Lets look close
U union
S Soviet
S socialist
R REPUBLIC
So lets see the republicans own the same title as communists if not more so, but that's not accurate either, get the drift?

Both Communist and Socialist are Left wing, one more extreme then the other. Bernie wants to enslave Wall Street, he is extreme

In fact, socialist doesn't mean communist at all, because those are two different things.

A socialist is a communist with a longer view towards the end game. That's all.

Ok Tzor before there was even a USSR, the American civil war took place and the North side was defined by a singular word UNION, that made it the Union States of America, of the REPUBLIC for which we stand.So lets look at it a different way now beings we are defining people and groups by words. And that's a bad idea all the way around.
U Union
S Soviet
S Socialist
R REPUBLIC

U Union/United which means basically the same thing
S States
A America
Which is a Democratic REPUBLIC

So with that in mind the GOP are the true communist party of America,beings we are using specific words to define people, no matter what the real definition of what that word really means. Now you are a smart person, so just say you don't like Bernie Sanders and be done with it, name calling belittles your education without proof

Republicans are Right wing, they have nothing in common with USSR, the term Republic represents a form of government in which there is no monarch, both USSR and USA never had a monarch. Currently, 147 of the world's 206 sovereign states use the word "republic" as part of their official names; not all of these are republics in the sense of having elected governments, nor do all nations with elected governments use the word "republic" in their names.

My point exactly words and labels do not DEFINE people their actions do.
I was pointing out a socialist democrat is not automatically a communist.

[tzor]

Ok Tzor before there was even a USSR, the American civil war took place and the North side was defined by a singular word UNION, that made it the Union States of America, of the REPUBLIC for which we stand.

Oh what crap and bullshit. By the way, the "pledge of allegiance" to the flag was originally written by a communist. Just saying.

Prior to the Civil War, the nation known as the "United States of America" was a plural noun. It wasn't until after the war (and after the death of Lincoln) that it became a singular noun. Lincoln fought to preserve the "Union" which was the original constitutional compact that joined the states. This resulted in the change of government from federal to central, but even then it need to take place over the course of decades, if not a whole century.

But then again, who the hell cares. The question of communism / socialism has nothing to do with centralism / subsidiarity (of which federalism, lies somewhere in the middle). The question is the function of government itself, from the guarantor of rights to the enforcer of unequal equality. Communism is the absolute and total control over all aspects of life, especially the means of production, with no mechanism to ensure that production is optimized in any way. When production is not rewarded, no production occurs. Shortages ensues. One only has to look at the history of the USSR to see this in the past. One only needs to look at Venezuela to see this happening in the present.

How is Bernie Sanders going to keep international companies from moving out of the United States? Nationalizing them, perhaps? Welcome to Communism.

[jgordon1111]

Ok Tzor before there was even a USSR, the American civil war took place and the North side was defined by a singular word UNION, that made it the Union States of America, of the REPUBLIC for which we stand.

Oh what crap and bullshit. By the way, the "pledge of allegiance" to the flag was originally written by a communist. Just saying.

Prior to the Civil War, the nation known as the "United States of America" was a plural noun. It wasn't until after the war (and after the death of Lincoln) that it became a singular noun. Lincoln fought to preserve the "Union" which was the original constitutional compact that joined the states. This resulted in the change of government from federal to central, but even then it need to take place over the course of decades, if not a whole century.

Ok Tzor brass tacks then, what irrefutable proof do you have that Bernie Sanders is a communist? And by irrefutable I mean anything he has done that other politicians in America haven't already done or attempted?

And do me the favor don't just take one piece of what I say and use it as a quote, it's disingenuous, I don't do it and don't expect it from intelligent people
But then again, who the hell cares. The question of communism / socialism has nothing to do with centralism / subsidiarity (of which federalism, lies somewhere in the middle). The question is the function of government itself, from the guarantor of rights to the enforcer of unequal equality. Communism is the absolute and total control over all aspects of life, especially the means of production, with no mechanism to ensure that production is optimized in any way. When production is not rewarded, no production occurs. Shortages ensues. One only has to look at the history of the USSR to see this in the past. One only needs to look at Venezuela to see this happening in the present.

How is Bernie Sanders going to keep international companies from moving out of the United States? Nationalizing them, perhaps? Welcome to Communism.

[jgordon1111]

Lol I just realized what happened in last post, not intentionally done, but done is done

[jgordon1111]

And seriously no one here really believes the person posting here is the actual person running for president of the United state's, look at what he says and how he says it,

That is the only humorous thing about this guy

[Army of GOD]

Why are you speaking in the third person Bernie?

[Bernie Sanders]

Why are you speaking in the third person Bernie?

I'm always speaking in the 2nd, third and fourth person.



At least I don't talk in tongue, like the Republican supporters do here.

[tzor]

Ok Tzor brass tacks then, what irrefutable proof do you have that Bernie Sanders is a communist? And by irrefutable I mean anything he has done that other politicians in America haven't already done or attempted?

First of all Bernie Sanders is a "Socialist" (a communist with a longer timeline) in the national sense (as opposed to an international socialist who wants to push everything up to a level above the national level) and "Democratic" in the sense that ... well going there is following a useless red herring.

Bernie Sanders will lead us to communism, because of the unstable nature of his socialist state. He wants to pay for his plans by attacking major corporations. I don't particularly like major corporations either but you wind up with a Fountainhead moment. Major corporations who love their tax breaks don't have to blindly follow the dictates of the president of the day; they can literally "go gault." They can effectively move their operations by shutting down their American operations. Lots of factories are already closing in the United States. Lots of factories are being created in other countries. Perhaps you can indave that Peg Legged Pirate called the Cayman Islands.



But are you going to invade the EU for companies that have moved to Ireland? What about Canada? The more you raise the corporate tax rate the more you are going to see those potential sources of jobs and revenue leave the country. They will go gault in a heartbeat and you will be left with less and less. Eventually you will have to start to nationalize things and then it will go to hell in a hand basket.

So the proof that Bernie's plans will lead to communism is a direct result of the way he wants to pay for it; through crushing corporate taxes. Actually, he should do the opposite, realize that corporate taxes are an illusion and instead eliminate them entirely. Allow companies to dump all their money into the United States tax free. I mean what is a corporation going to do with all that cash in the US? Buy things perhaps (that creates jobs)? Hire more employees (also creates more jobs)? More jobs = more people paying income taxes. And they are happier to boot. And happy people vote for the incumbent.