Moderator: Community Team
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
Serbia wrote:I'm an Anaheim win away from being 11-1 in the playoffs so far, with my only blemish being my Colorado pick. For my overall picks, I need a Ducks win; I've got them in the Finals.
Bollocks.
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
sempaispellcheck wrote:Bruins over Wings in 5
Bolts over Habs in 6
Pens over BJs (tee hee) in 5
Rangers over Flyers (pigs) in 7
Avs over Wild in 5
Hawks over Blues in 6
Ducks over Stars in 5
Sharks over Kings in 6
Winners: 5/8
Lengths: 3/8
Points: 59/104
Bruins over Bolts Habs in 5
Pens over Rangers in 6
Hawks over Avs Wild in 7
Ducks over Sharks Kings in 6
This round:
Winners: 1/4
Lengths: 0/4
Points: 10/40(52)
Total:
Winners: 6/12
Lengths: 3/12
Points: 69/144(156)
Pens Rangers over Bruins Habs in 7
Ducks Kings over Hawks in 6
Pens Rangers over Ducks Kings in 6 - 35 total goals.
Because FU, that's why.
sempai
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
IcePack wrote:Price out for the eastern finals.
Habs r screwed.
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
sempaispellcheck wrote:Brandon Prust will miss the start of next season.
There was absolutely no reason for that.
Side note: I wonder how much it cost the Habs to bribe the refs.
oVo wrote:Habs get one back in OT.
Gillipig wrote:oVo wrote:Habs get one back in OT.
I love your analysis of the game.
Gillipig wrote:Can anyone explain why Canada is on a 5 year choking streak at the World's? It makes no sense to me.
It's not like Canada is the only team that can't send their best players, the same account for Sweden for example.
If you compare Canada's depth with Sweden's depth, only a fool would say that Sweden has greater depth, so not having their top players available should hurt Sweden more than it hurts Canada.
Canada's B-team is ridicoulusly much more talented than Sweden's B-team. Their A-teams are much closer in comparison. So Canada should be sweeping teams like Sweden in the world championships, and yet they aren't.
What's wrong with them?
Gillipig wrote:Can anyone explain why Canada is on a 5 year choking streak at the World's? It makes no sense to me.
It's not like Canada is the only team that can't send their best players, the same account for Sweden for example.
If you compare Canada's depth with Sweden's depth, only a fool would say that Sweden has greater depth, so not having their top players available should hurt Sweden more than it hurts Canada.
Canada's B-team is ridicoulusly much more talented than Sweden's B-team. Their A-teams are much closer in comparison. So Canada should be sweeping teams like Sweden in the world championships, and yet they aren't.
What's wrong with them?
Timminz wrote:Gillipig wrote:Can anyone explain why Canada is on a 5 year choking streak at the World's? It makes no sense to me.
It's not like Canada is the only team that can't send their best players, the same account for Sweden for example.
If you compare Canada's depth with Sweden's depth, only a fool would say that Sweden has greater depth, so not having their top players available should hurt Sweden more than it hurts Canada.
Canada's B-team is ridicoulusly much more talented than Sweden's B-team. Their A-teams are much closer in comparison. So Canada should be sweeping teams like Sweden in the world championships, and yet they aren't.
What's wrong with them?
Because Canada doesn't really care about the world championships. There's a far more important championship being decided at the same time every year.
Timminz wrote:Gillipig wrote:Can anyone explain why Canada is on a 5 year choking streak at the World's? It makes no sense to me.
It's not like Canada is the only team that can't send their best players, the same account for Sweden for example.
If you compare Canada's depth with Sweden's depth, only a fool would say that Sweden has greater depth, so not having their top players available should hurt Sweden more than it hurts Canada.
Canada's B-team is ridicoulusly much more talented than Sweden's B-team. Their A-teams are much closer in comparison. So Canada should be sweeping teams like Sweden in the world championships, and yet they aren't.
What's wrong with them?
Because Canada doesn't really care about the world championships. There's a far more important championship being decided at the same time every year.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users