Moderator: Community Team
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
strike wolf wrote:The thing that bugged me is that they were so picky about penalties when the Colts were involved yet the Chargers held Freeney(Sp?) all day long and it wasn't called once.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
strike wolf wrote:So will the Falcons. As bad as the reffing was in the Colts game, the calls (or lack thereof) was worse in the Falcons game. The Cards D was jumping pretty much all day long but only called for it 2-3 times. That really may have been the difference. If the refs had done their jobs and thrown the flags on it, than it probably would have forced the Cards to back off some and allow Atlanta some room to work.
strike wolf wrote:As bad as the reffing was in the Colts game, the calls (or lack thereof) was worse in the Falcons game. The Cards D was jumping pretty much all day long but only called for it 2-3 times.
That first penalty. While the defender was holding him, he was also BEING held by the Chargers. That penalty should have been off-set. Not to mention all the no calls while Freeney was being held throughout the game.oVo wrote:strike wolf wrote:As bad as the reffing was in the Colts game, the calls (or lack thereof) was worse in the Falcons game. The Cards D was jumping pretty much all day long but only called for it 2-3 times.
LOL... It wasn't the refs that sustained the Chargers drive with 3 penalties for first downs, it was the Colts. I mean those infractions were all blatant; (1) the defensive lineman called for holding, grabbed the center by the collar of his shoulder pads and spun him around, (2) the personal foul face mask where Sproles head was turned back (used to be called flagrant) and (3) the holding on the DB could have just as easily been pass interference... since he did both before the play had ended.
Despite not generating no sacks or turnovers. Atlanta's defense only allowed the Cards 2 drives in that second half against a team that really was playing pretty well on offense. With the exception of a few plays (particularly the last first down play), Atlanta's defense played reasonably well in the second half and I have no complaints there. The biggest problem was Arizona being able to get head starts on their defensive line through some good anticipation and a whole lot of offsides that were never called. Above all the other no calls in that game, that had the most impact. If the refs had done their jobs and called them out when they went off-sides, the Cards would have probably been more tentative about jumping the snap count and given Atlanta more room to work with.oVo wrote:The Atlanta game had an abundance of "No Calls" which included a couple molestations of receivers by Falcon DBs and a hold in the end zone that should have given the Cardinals 2 points and the ball. The stats say Atlanta: six penalties for 52 yards and Arizona: six penalties for 47 yards, but their biggest problem wasn't the Refs, it was getting outscored 16 to 7 in the second half while getting no sacks or turnovers.
oVo wrote:Matt Ryan had well executed drives for TDs in both halfs, but commited some rookie mistakes too and with no sustainable rushing attack it was all on his shoulders. I figure crowd noise was also factor, since the Falcons didn't vary their snap count a whole lot to take advantage of a very aggressive Cardinal pass rush. Still the game was tight and since Arizona couldn't pull away, I was expecting Atlanta to come back and win it 31-30, but of course it didn't happen.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
strike wolf wrote: That first penalty. While the defender was holding him, he was also BEING held by the Chargers. That penalty should have been off-set. Not to mention all the no calls while Freeney was being held throughout the game.
strike wolf wrote:The biggest problem was Arizona being able to get head starts on their defensive line through some good anticipation and a whole lot of offsides that were never called. Above all the other no calls in that game, that had the most impact. If the refs had done their jobs and called them out when they went off-sides, the Cards would have probably been more tentative about jumping the snap count and given Atlanta more room to work with.
oVo wrote:strike wolf wrote: That first penalty. While the defender was holding him, he was also BEING held by the Chargers. That penalty should have been off-set. Not to mention all the no calls while Freeney was being held throughout the game.
Nah... there was a good replay that isolated the penalty and the defensive lineman was totally un-engaged and reached out with his left hand to grab the Charger center and spin him around. It was a dumb move and an obvious infraction.strike wolf wrote:The biggest problem was Arizona being able to get head starts on their defensive line through some good anticipation and a whole lot of offsides that were never called. Above all the other no calls in that game, that had the most impact. If the refs had done their jobs and called them out when they went off-sides, the Cards would have probably been more tentative about jumping the snap count and given Atlanta more room to work with.
I only saw the Cardinals get away with one blatant offsides and that was in the first half, although the defense really pushed their luck with it most of the game and I fault the Falcons' coaches for not finding a way to take advantage of the situation. Don't you think the holding that wasn't called in the end zone would have had some "impact" on the game?
Speaking of getting their shit together, if the Dolphins don't figure out a few things at halftime it's over for them too, because the Ravens defense is starting to dominate the game... and Pennington has already made a few bad decisions.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
got tonkaed wrote:Edit: If Ed Reed and Chuck Norris got into a fight who would win? Its a trick question, because Chuck Norris is actually Ed Reed walking around in Cowboy disguise.
oVo wrote:You don't think 8-8 San Diego is capable of being the upset mongers?
Ok, they're 9-8 now and possibly the best 8 loss team ever...
but every game they win will be considered an upset from here on out.
oVo wrote:LOL! It was the Colts dumbass defense suddenly playing stoopid
and not zebra love that netted the Bolts three first downs and helped
sustain that drive for the winning TOUCHDOWN in OT yesterday.
The CHARGERS will be following the example of the recent STEELER champions
if they do somehow manage to make it to the Super Bowl.
In the meantime... I think the Vikings have a chance of winning this Wild Card Game,
with TWO offensive TDs in the first half against NONE for the Eagles,
at this rate they can get it done.
SEAsportsfan wrote:got tonkaed wrote:Edit: If Ed Reed and Chuck Norris got into a fight who would win? Its a trick question, because Chuck Norris is actually Ed Reed walking around in Cowboy disguise.
![]()
Ed Reed is such a beast.
My early prediction for next week Baltimore upsets Tennessee. There's always a wild card upset, and I think Baltimore's this years upset team.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
oVo wrote:You don't think 8-8 San Diego is capable of being the upset mongers?
Ok, they're 9-8 now and possibly the best 8 loss team ever...
but every game they win will be considered an upset from here on out.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users