Who was it in this thread that brought up that there was video showing Zimmerman had no injuries? Oh, I remember, it was Sym. Now I can see why he refuses to acknowledge that Zimmerman did indeed have evidence of head wounds and very likely has medical records indicating the same.
Sym also posted a link about a "new witness" that either A)lied or B) was incorrect in stating that Zimmerman had no injuries.
Contrary to Syms view, it does indeed appear that evidence is supporting Zimmerman's side of the story. Hmmm.....
Symmetry wrote:This might be of interest:
Trayvon Martin shooting: CCTV footage shows George Zimmerman sustained no injuriesThe 28-year-old George Zimmerman's head and face are visible throughout the footage and he is dressed in a red and black fleece jacket. Police are shown frisking Zimmerman whose hands were handcuffed behind his back. They then lead him into a building.
Zimmerman said he was pursuing 17-year-old Martin, who was not armed, because the teen was acting suspiciously. He said he lost sight of the black teenager and Martin attacked him as he headed back to his sport utility vehicle. Zimmerman's father is white and his mother is Hispanic.
The neighbourhood watch volunteer told police he fired in self-defence and he was not arrested, touching off widespread public outrage and protests across the country. Zimmerman's attorney, Craig Sonner, has said in more than one interview that his client's nose was broken during the fight with Martin.
The Orlando Sentinel, citing anonymous sources, has reported that Martin grabbed Zimmerman's head and banged it several times against the sidewalk. A statement from police said the newspaper's story was "consistent" with evidence turned over to prosecutors.
Mr Sonner said the gash on the back of Zimmerman's head probably was serious enough for stitches, but he waited too long for treatment so the wound was already healing. Miguel Meza, who identified himself as Zimmerman's cousin, said Zimmerman was in "the fight of his life."
Hmm, seems like the evidence on the Zimmerman side doesn't quite add up. The video footage, if anyone feels like examining it, is embedded in the link.
Further info, this time from the Guardian, suggests that an additional eyewitness has come forward to say that Zimmerman was not obviously injured in the altercation.
Trayvon Martin lawyers intensify call for arrest amid more evidence leaksLawyers from Trayvon Martin's family have stepped up calls for his killer to be arrested after a new eyewitness and leaked CCTV footage from the police station cast doubt on George Zimmerman's claim that he had acted in self-defence.
The new witness claims he saw the neighbourhood watch captain walking away from the fatal altercation with no blood on him, countering Zimmerman's statement that he sustained a broken nose and bloody injuries to the back of his head.
Any comment on the apparent misinformation, Sym? Note: I'm well aware that you merely linked what had been reported and that you had no idea that the information would turn out to be at best inconclusive let alone completely wrong.
But being as you were operating on the assumption that Zimmerman had no injuries, and thus had no claim of self defense, with this new information I am wondering what your thoughts on the likely fact that Zimmerman was indeed getting beat and apparently was having his head bashed into the ground by Martin before firing the fatal shot in apparent self defense.
Would you allow for that circumstance, that if a person is beating and bashing another's head into the ground, that the person being beat would have a right to defend himself?
And does this make those who have been saying all along that Zimmerman is lying and there was no self defense involved in the shooting?
I still don't know what happened that night, but this new information doesn't change my views of the whole incident at all. That Zimmerman will make a claim of self defense and that prosecutors will have to prove that there was no self defense. As well as that the worst charge that Zimmerman could be charged with is manslaughter. If he's even charged at all.
The grand jury will be meeting soon to determine what, if any, charges will be filed against Zimmerman. We'll all find out soon enough I suppose.
saxi wrote:Does Zimmerman have a defamation case against NBC?
Why do you think NBC is launching this "internal investigation"? Altering evidence like that in the attempt to change the facts to imply charges of racism by NBC goes a bit beyond mere reporting of the story. They'll be liable for that falsehood and their investigation will find a poor bastard to be tossed to the wolves, as it were, in the event that Zimmerman pursues that line later.