FREEEE Phatscotty!!

[john9blue]

but yeah the mods on site are totally biased against liberals

totally

[Lootifer]

Prob an accumulation ban; he does break the more minor rules fairly regularly (more than average - we all break the rules to a certain extent). Things like baiting, straying off topic, very minor offensive remarks etc etc. I'd say they just reached some admin determined critical point.

[Serbia]

Yawn.

[DoomYoshi]

I got fresh info:


He got banned for 90 days.

His previous ban was for necrobumping, the previous for double posting.

Doesn't seem fair.

A ban for double posting. Unbelievable. I should go necrobump my rule breaking thread.

[rdsrds2120]

Nietzsche, we need more deets. Spill the beans.

BMO

[betiko]

I got fresh info:


He got banned for 90 days.

His previous ban was for necrobumping, the previous for double posting.

Doesn't seem fair.

nice fishing.

[Dukasaur]

I got fresh info:


He got banned for 90 days.

His previous ban was for necrobumping, the previous for double posting.

Doesn't seem fair.

A ban for double posting. Unbelievable. I should go necrobump my rule breaking thread.

Necrobumping is not what you think it is. Put that shovel away!

[Symmetry]

I got fresh info:


He got banned for 90 days.

His previous ban was for necrobumping, the previous for double posting.

Doesn't seem fair.

To be fair, if I remember correctly, he necrobumped quite a lot of threads by a single poster that were spread over a period of time while trying to get that poster banned for posting more than he liked. It wasn't one of his finer days.

[DoomYoshi]

I got fresh info:


He got banned for 90 days.

His previous ban was for necrobumping, the previous for double posting.

Doesn't seem fair.

To be fair, if I remember correctly, he necrobumped quite a lot of threads by a single poster that were spread over a period of time while trying to get that poster banned for posting more than he liked. It wasn't one of his finer days.

Necrobumping is defined as bumping a thread without adding anything to the conversation. If PhatScotty is adding "the user who started this thread is a total dickbag, it's not quite necrobumping". Of course, like with the definition of n00b, total dickbags have gone and muddied it.

[Symmetry]

I got fresh info:


He got banned for 90 days.

His previous ban was for necrobumping, the previous for double posting.

Doesn't seem fair.

To be fair, if I remember correctly, he necrobumped quite a lot of threads by a single poster that were spread over a period of time while trying to get that poster banned for posting more than he liked. It wasn't one of his finer days.

Necrobumping is defined as bumping a thread without adding anything to the conversation. If PhatScotty is adding "the user who started this thread is a total dickbag, it's not quite necrobumping". Of course, like with the definition of n00b, total dickbags have gone and muddied it.

No- he wasn't doing that- he was basically bumping each thread with something along the lines of "This is interesting" to each post he necrobumped. And he bumped quite a lot. He wasn't adding anything to the conversation and was trying to get another poster banned, as far as I recall.

[Gillipig]

I got fresh info:


He got banned for 90 days.

His previous ban was for necrobumping, the previous for double posting.

Doesn't seem fair.

I think he got away easy for that vicious crime!

[Symmetry]

I got fresh info:


He got banned for 90 days.

His previous ban was for necrobumping, the previous for double posting.

Doesn't seem fair.

I think he got away easy for that vicious crime!

Yeah- not sure about the double posting stuff, though I've been on the receiving end of that Phatscotty tactic so I can see why it would come into play.

[john9blue]

which threads did he necro?

[notyou2]

Who cares.

[Symmetry]

which threads did he necro?

Pretty much anything he could find on the Tea Party by a certain poster he didn't want to post anymore as they were both pretty dedicated to posting about the Tea Party.

Ah, back in the day.

[Metsfanmax]

Phatscotty wishes to inform you that if you wish to conduct a fair duel of wits, you should join Live Chat instead of poking at him while he cannot respond.

[Symmetry]

Phatscotty wishes to inform you that if you wish to conduct a fair duel of wits, you should join Live Chat instead of poking at him while he cannot respond.

I have always conducted a fair duel of wits with him, even while he was able to post, alas that rarely equated to an ability to respond.

In the mean time, I kind of like prodding him while he's in yet another ban. Especially if it doesn't mean another 30 minute long episode of the Glenn Beck Show as response.

[notyou2]

That was a waste of time and typing

[notyou2]

So Symm, you and he were quite the chums back in the day?

[nietzsche]

Nietzsche, we need more deets. Spill the beans.

BMO

Well, who informed me about all this is lackattack, who has still access to your terror reign files.

[Symmetry]

So Symm, you and he were quite the chums back in the day?

In a way- he's actually a good poster when he's just being honest about his opinions. Not someone I agree with, but that's never been my criteria for a good poster.

[notyou2]

So Symm, you and he were quite the chums back in the day?

In a way- he's actually a good poster when he's just being honest about his opinions. Not someone I agree with, but that's never been my criteria for a good poster.

He blames you for everything.

[nietzsche]

I do think that Phatscotty is harmless.

He might be very ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- far right
but he is rather a cool person. I think his methods of debate are fairly known and as BBS pointed out in the past, the community itself takes care of this.

90 days is a lot, it'll be good if we were informed exactly WHY he was banned. Why is this info a secret? I think it concerns all of us, since punishments don't seem to be always the same for the same behavior.

For instance, I sent pimpdave 3 personal messages with rather funny pictures alone, no words, the pictures were explicit and all but if you know me you know I was kidding to some degree: one was of a guy with a small penis and 2 or 3 girls laughing at him.. another was a bloody heart on a plate next to a knife and the third was a poster for a summer fat camp. I got banned, a month if I recall correctly.

Funkyterrance sent me 3 pms, the 3 of them with nasty comments, I did not respond to any of them and when the 3rd arrived I thought it'll be great to finally have him banned. Since I was banned for 3 pms, he was going to get banned for his agressive pms. Well, he wasn't banned.

[Symmetry]

So Symm, you and he were quite the chums back in the day?

In a way- he's actually a good poster when he's just being honest about his opinions. Not someone I agree with, but that's never been my criteria for a good poster.

He blames you for everything.

I'm pretty ok with that.

[Symmetry]

I do think that Phatscotty is harmless.

He might be very ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- far right
but he is rather a cool person. I think his methods of debate are fairly known and as BBS pointed out in the past, the community itself takes care of this.

90 days is a lot, it'll be good if we were informed exactly WHY he was banned. Why is this info a secret? I think it concerns all of us, since punishments don't seem to be always the same for the same behavior.

For instance, I sent pimpdave 3 personal messages with rather funny pictures alone, no words, the pictures were explicit and all but if you know me you know I was kidding to some degree: one was of a guy with a small penis and 2 or 3 girls laughing at him.. another was a bloody heart on a plate next to a knife and the third was a poster for a summer fat camp. I got banned, a month if I recall correctly.

Funkyterrance sent me 3 pms, the 3 of them with nasty comments, I did not respond to any of them and when the 3rd arrived I thought it'll be great to finally have him banned. Since I was banned for 3 pms, he was going to get banned for his agressive pms. Well, he wasn't banned.

I've got no clue what the latest ban was for, but you know the whole thing about bans is that they escalate.