Fircoal wrote:The Weird One wrote:2dimes wrote:Too many people claiming they were given unfair bad ratings.
Bah...the ratings system they have now is too vague...I mean, it's easy to use, but, for that very reason, most people have obscenenely inflated ratings....Most people -my lazy ass included- will just leave fives across the board, for most people...Before you could at least get some idea of why...
That abbreviated ramble aside, I can understand the reasoning....thanks for the response, sir.
I hate the ratings. All it shows are a bunch of numbers on the screen. That may tell me something but it doesn't tell me everything. With feedback you were able to express yourself as well as you could words. I look through my own feedback and see what I was like back in the day. Who was doing what. I read some of the glowing reviews and I feel proud. I can see exactly how people felt. Now I just see a bunch of 5's most everywhere. Basically all I can tell now is who is nice and who isn't. Before you could probably tell more of how nice. Meh, I feel the ratings just aren't personal enough.
That's my exact issue...I'll admit, there is some level of ego stroking involved with my like of the old feedback system...a decent number of my glowing reviews saying good strategy were from high-ranked [or at least they now are] individuals...that really means nothing, in the grand scheme of things...The checkboxes they have, now, are better than nothing, but they just can't have enough to fill out all the possibilities...
