qwert wrote:To be honest in Africa most people starving, and still in US and West Countries(high developed ) are throw food in garbage . So if Monsanto create GMO to increase more food , so that people not starve , then he need to sell GMO to Africa for low prices. If Monsanto sell GMO to rich countries to make big profit, then this reason "geneticists try to make food be able to feed more people" are pointless, because poor people in Africa , who starving, can not buy GMO, and will stay hungry.
US companies look for profit, they dont care for poor people in Africa who starve to dead.
Zambia, for example, refused any GM food aid from the U.S. during the 2002 drought. Other South African countries have likewise refused any unmilled products for fear of contamination. These are just some of the examples of the U.S. giving away GM food.
saxi wrote:GMOs are dangerous because they are designed to bring about a disharmonious economic system, which is dangerous. So saying GMOs are dangerous is 100% accurate. Russia stands tall with the 34 EU states who have banned and/or required warning labels on GMOs.
Shrilling on about this and joining the "hurr-durr frankenfood" crowd, you're simply ensuring that the corporations will continue to engage in this behavior. They don't give two shits whether you force some ban or labeling agenda. They'll still find ways to lobby legislators and bring their products to market, and people will still consume them.
-TG