Moderator: Community Team
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis
Spazz Arcane wrote:If birds could swim and fish could fly I would awaken in the morning to the sturgeons cry. If fish could fly and birds could swim I'd still use worms to fish for them.
saxitoxin wrote:I'm on Team GabonX
Spazz Arcane wrote:If birds could swim and fish could fly I would awaken in the morning to the sturgeons cry. If fish could fly and birds could swim I'd still use worms to fish for them.
saxitoxin wrote:I'm on Team GabonX
oVo wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Bottom line, in a Free country, a religious rooted company should not be forced to provide abortions. It's really that simple
They aren't selling Bibles or providing abortions. Legislating from "The Bench" is not a good thing, even in a free country. This Supreme Court decision opens the door for all sorts of religious discrimination and dissent.
The Corporate leadership of Hobby Lobby is absurdly hypocritical
in their choices and methods of operation.
Woodruff wrote:danfrank666 wrote:Woodruff wrote:Anyone who supports the recent Supreme Court ruling AND feels that abortion should be illegal really needs to take a serious look at their values. The ability for a woman to have easy access to contraceptives helps to prevent unwanted pregnancies which LITERALLY helps to keep down the need for abortions. Thus, this ruling actually acts to INCREASE future abortions due to unwanted pregnancies.
When your interviewed by hobby lobby they explain that they are deeply rooted in the catholic community and if you dont like it , you can get the f*ck out. A win for religious LIBERTY.
Did you feel any of this actually counters what I said? Because it doesn't, at all. Did you have a response to my point?
You clearly have no understanding of women or gay rights, so of course this makes you an idiot, a bigot, and a racist.Phatscotty wrote:Woodruff wrote:danfrank666 wrote:Woodruff wrote:Anyone who supports the recent Supreme Court ruling AND feels that abortion should be illegal really needs to take a serious look at their values. The ability for a woman to have easy access to contraceptives helps to prevent unwanted pregnancies which LITERALLY helps to keep down the need for abortions. Thus, this ruling actually acts to INCREASE future abortions due to unwanted pregnancies.
When your interviewed by hobby lobby they explain that they are deeply rooted in the catholic community and if you dont like it , you can get the f*ck out. A win for religious LIBERTY.
Did you feel any of this actually counters what I said? Because it doesn't, at all. Did you have a response to my point?
Yeah well let's see if you feel the same way when a future president tries to force an Islamic based company to bail out the pork industry or host a gay marriage.
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis
Phatscotty wrote:If they aren't providing abortions, then what is all the fuss about?
DaGip wrote:...an idiot, a bigot, and a racist.
Frigidus wrote:
Just hopping on real quick to say that while there are plenty of legitimate criticisms of modern feminism that can be made, Return of Kings is not exactly the kind of guy you want to be aligning yourself with.
Spazz Arcane wrote:If birds could swim and fish could fly I would awaken in the morning to the sturgeons cry. If fish could fly and birds could swim I'd still use worms to fish for them.
saxitoxin wrote:I'm on Team GabonX
oVo wrote:danfrank666 wrote: I support the ruling , If your logical you should too.
If you're logical you will realize that this means "religious moral grounds" can be used to legally circumnavigate existing law.
What Woodruff has been attempting to express: He thinks Pro-Lifers who are anti-abortion should support all forms of birth control and women's healthcare so that less abortions are necessary.
Pro-Lifers should be known as Pro-Birthers, since their actions show they care little about what happens to people after they enter this world. Once they're here food, clothing, healthcare and a place to live is their problem and of no concern to Pro-Lifers.
Phatscotty wrote:The purchasing power of our currency buys less and less, and I understand the natural human tendency to demand the government give aid, and a compassionate society should, but that does nothing to deal with the root of the problem and actually makes it worse. The more money we print, the less purchasing power it will have. And many of you just want to keep printing the money to keep giving aid and government programs without even thinking about where the money comes from, dare I say not even caring, but the bottom line is things will continue to get more and more expensive so long as our currency is worth less and less, which only makes the problems bigger and bigger, which only demands a government that is bigger and bigger, which only demands that we print more and more money. The issues will never be 'fixed' the way we are going, we are only papering our problems over, kicking the can down the road. And while it might work for the short term, it's absolutely impossible to sustain in the long term.
We need real solutions, and that's not going to happen when we continue to turn our backs on our principles.
Spazz Arcane wrote:If birds could swim and fish could fly I would awaken in the morning to the sturgeons cry. If fish could fly and birds could swim I'd still use worms to fish for them.
saxitoxin wrote:I'm on Team GabonX
oVo wrote:Phatscotty wrote:If they aren't providing abortions, then what is all the fuss about?
Don't know why the ownership of Hobby Lobby invests in the development and production of the drugs they don't want made available to their employees. Maybe they will explain how their moral attitude is allowed to slide with their own investments and product sources at some point in the future.
GabonX wrote:Phatscotty wrote:The purchasing power of our currency buys less and less, and I understand the natural human tendency to demand the government give aid, and a compassionate society should, but that does nothing to deal with the root of the problem and actually makes it worse. The more money we print, the less purchasing power it will have. And many of you just want to keep printing the money to keep giving aid and government programs without even thinking about where the money comes from, dare I say not even caring, but the bottom line is things will continue to get more and more expensive so long as our currency is worth less and less, which only makes the problems bigger and bigger, which only demands a government that is bigger and bigger, which only demands that we print more and more money. The issues will never be 'fixed' the way we are going, we are only papering our problems over, kicking the can down the road. And while it might work for the short term, it's absolutely impossible to sustain in the long term.
We need real solutions, and that's not going to happen when we continue to turn our backs on our principles.
Scott, you cannot help these people. The solution is to take care of your own. We know that recessions tend to hit hard towards the end of a President's second term, and this time we have a currency bubble... So buy bullion now so you can cash in and buy stocks when they bottom out some time in the next two years.
Thank me later.
oVo wrote:You do know that the founders of this country created a Republic and not a Democracy. I have mixed feelings on the Supreme Court ruling and wonder why such a thing was pushed this far in the first place. There may be more to this than has been revealed, as to the true intent behind these "religious convictions."
I lean in the direction of "Choice" and not the imposition of religious morals on others. If you're a genuine believer? Let God be the judge and trust the divine being to sort it out when the time comes.
Night Strike wrote:oVo wrote:You do know that the founders of this country created a Republic and not a Democracy. I have mixed feelings on the Supreme Court ruling and wonder why such a thing was pushed this far in the first place. There may be more to this than has been revealed, as to the true intent behind these "religious convictions."
I lean in the direction of "Choice" and not the imposition of religious morals on others. If you're a genuine believer? Let God be the judge and trust the divine being to sort it out when the time comes.
Except Hobby Lobby is not imposing their owner's religious morals on others. In fact, it was actually the pro-abortion crowd and the government forcing their religious morals on the owners of Hobby Lobby by forcing them to pay for someone else's contraceptives and abortion-causing drugs. If you're truly pro-choice, people would make their own choice then pay for their own choices instead of making a choice and forcing someone else to pay for it.
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis
targetman377 wrote:People are so focused on this issue.. Here is an idea lets have Capital system play it out? You see its simple if you don't like how a company treats its employees fine don't shop there! wow problem solved if you work there and feel your benefits are not what they should be change your job.. some might say that's hard to do but if your a cashier at hobbie lobby i assure you can find the same job at target or wall mart or any other retail. and if more people leave then the price that hobby lobby has to pay to employ people then people make more money!!! you see this whole argument is just really silly Who have a choice to shop there or not, to work there or not. its that simple. if everyone stops shopping there because of the policy they introduce then fine it goes under a new store will take its place!!! woot woot capitalism win.
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis
DaGip wrote:targetman377 wrote:People are so focused on this issue.. Here is an idea lets have Capital system play it out? You see its simple if you don't like how a company treats its employees fine don't shop there! wow problem solved if you work there and feel your benefits are not what they should be change your job.. some might say that's hard to do but if your a cashier at hobbie lobby i assure you can find the same job at target or wall mart or any other retail. and if more people leave then the price that hobby lobby has to pay to employ people then people make more money!!! you see this whole argument is just really silly Who have a choice to shop there or not, to work there or not. its that simple. if everyone stops shopping there because of the policy they introduce then fine it goes under a new store will take its place!!! woot woot capitalism win.
So,...you're saying you believe in Pro-Choice then.
targetman377 wrote:What i am saying is simple if you don't like a company than you have a choice.
targetman377 wrote: Just as i think there should not be a law to to force people to do pay for something they don't agree with.
AndyDufresne wrote:targetman377 wrote: Just as i think there should not be a law to to force people to do pay for something they don't agree with.
Except for taxes. We all pay for lots of things that we'd rather not see it go towards.
--Andy
DaGip wrote:Night Strike wrote:oVo wrote:You do know that the founders of this country created a Republic and not a Democracy. I have mixed feelings on the Supreme Court ruling and wonder why such a thing was pushed this far in the first place. There may be more to this than has been revealed, as to the true intent behind these "religious convictions."
I lean in the direction of "Choice" and not the imposition of religious morals on others. If you're a genuine believer? Let God be the judge and trust the divine being to sort it out when the time comes.
Except Hobby Lobby is not imposing their owner's religious morals on others. In fact, it was actually the pro-abortion crowd and the government forcing their religious morals on the owners of Hobby Lobby by forcing them to pay for someone else's contraceptives and abortion-causing drugs. If you're truly pro-choice, people would make their own choice then pay for their own choices instead of making a choice and forcing someone else to pay for it.
I started reading and thought to myself,"You know, Night Strike is making a really good point..."
All except the part that governments and pro-choice individuals have a "religion" and are "forcing" this on people.
Okay, so the speed limit is 55...you get caught speeding...somehow the government is forcing it's "religious belief" that 55 is the best speed limit on you and therefor you have to pay a fine.
Dude...what fucking planet did you just land on?
oVo wrote:danfrank666 wrote: I support the ruling , If your logical you should too.
If you're logical you will realize that this means "religious moral grounds" can be used to legally circumnavigate existing law.
What Woodruff has been attempting to express: He thinks Pro-Lifers who are anti-abortion should support all forms of birth control and women's healthcare so that less abortions are necessary.
Pro-Lifers should be known as Pro-Birthers, since their actions show they care little about what happens to people after they enter this world. Once they're here food, clothing, healthcare and a place to live is their problem and of no concern to Pro-Lifers.
Users browsing this forum: Evil Semp