patches70 wrote:mrswdk wrote:Brute force and bully tactics cannot really be described as 'chess'.
Oh my, brute force and bullying are tactics in chess and you are kidding yourself if you don't think the Ukraine is just another cog in the geopolitical game that can certainly be described as chess. And Putin, whatever his faults or what one has against him, is a far better player at the game than most others.
How it plays out remains yet to be seen, but at the moment the ones sitting on the other side of the table are playing defense as Putin keeps countering every move made against him.
Yes, it's chess all right, and we regular people are the pawns. We don't even have the option of not playing the game. Mayhap Putin's gambit will fall apart, but considering the caliber of his foes, I am not surprised at how badly it's going for Putin's opponents.
Just because you don't like your opponent doesn't mean you can't lose the game.
i think that Putin make good preparation, from previous situation.
-Yugoslavia bombardment (78 days)(ceasefire -kumanovo agreement- Yugoslav army minor damages)
-Iraq Invasion and occupation (over 10 years)(overthrow of Sadam)
-Afghanistan Invasion and occupation (still ongoing)
-Libya bombardment ( 7 month) (overthrow of Guadafy)
He take notes and observe how US and NAto behave in all this situations, and he try to improve this, first that action be fast,and second that casualty be almost zero.
Also he notice that US and Nato only attack small and weak countries, and he know that US will not get support from other NAto members, who are not ready to attack Russia( and they also not capable for this). Also big advantage for Putin its that Ukraine its neighbor country and army and logistic could be very easy to deploy, from other side US and Nato are not in this position.