m=0
Moderator: Community Team

















Phatscotty wrote:thegreekdog wrote:I made a funny and you guys didn't pick up on it (Baldur's Gate quote).
Look dudes, I'm all for pointing out inconsistencies in media coverage; I'm just also pointing out Drudge's inconsistentices. I agree that the media sensationalized this and now there's all this ridiculous violence that is completely misguided (as if violence is not misguided of its own accord). But Drudge's insistence on not letting this go is annoying. I want more politics and more sharks.
It's more than ridiculous. It's deadly serious. But why don't you send Drudge a letter, telling him not to report on hate crimes anymore. That way we don't have to be bothered with what is going on around us until something bad happens to someone in our family or someone we know.




















thegreekdog wrote:Phatscotty wrote:thegreekdog wrote:I made a funny and you guys didn't pick up on it (Baldur's Gate quote).
Look dudes, I'm all for pointing out inconsistencies in media coverage; I'm just also pointing out Drudge's inconsistentices. I agree that the media sensationalized this and now there's all this ridiculous violence that is completely misguided (as if violence is not misguided of its own accord). But Drudge's insistence on not letting this go is annoying. I want more politics and more sharks.
It's more than ridiculous. It's deadly serious. But why don't you send Drudge a letter, telling him not to report on hate crimes anymore. That way we don't have to be bothered with what is going on around us until something bad happens to someone in our family or someone we know.
Symmetry? Natty? Is that you?
C'mon PS. I said it 50 pages ago in this thread and I'll say it again - This shit happens all the time. No one reports on it. In six months Drudge won't report on it either. He's reporting on it now to advance his own agenda; same as the original media morons. Either he needs to report on this all the time (all violent, hate-related crimes, not just the black-on-white crime) or he needs to knock it the f*ck off.

























thegreekdog wrote:Phatscotty wrote:thegreekdog wrote:I made a funny and you guys didn't pick up on it (Baldur's Gate quote).
Look dudes, I'm all for pointing out inconsistencies in media coverage; I'm just also pointing out Drudge's inconsistentices. I agree that the media sensationalized this and now there's all this ridiculous violence that is completely misguided (as if violence is not misguided of its own accord). But Drudge's insistence on not letting this go is annoying. I want more politics and more sharks.
It's more than ridiculous. It's deadly serious. But why don't you send Drudge a letter, telling him not to report on hate crimes anymore. That way we don't have to be bothered with what is going on around us until something bad happens to someone in our family or someone we know.
Symmetry? Natty? Is that you?
C'mon PS. I said it 50 pages ago in this thread and I'll say it again - This shit happens all the time. No one reports on it. In six months Drudge won't report on it either. He's reporting on it now to advance his own agenda; same as the original media morons. Either he needs to report on this all the time (all violent, hate-related crimes, not just the black-on-white crime) or he needs to knock it the f*ck off.




















Phatscotty wrote:thegreekdog wrote:Phatscotty wrote:thegreekdog wrote:I made a funny and you guys didn't pick up on it (Baldur's Gate quote).
Look dudes, I'm all for pointing out inconsistencies in media coverage; I'm just also pointing out Drudge's inconsistentices. I agree that the media sensationalized this and now there's all this ridiculous violence that is completely misguided (as if violence is not misguided of its own accord). But Drudge's insistence on not letting this go is annoying. I want more politics and more sharks.
It's more than ridiculous. It's deadly serious. But why don't you send Drudge a letter, telling him not to report on hate crimes anymore. That way we don't have to be bothered with what is going on around us until something bad happens to someone in our family or someone we know.
Symmetry? Natty? Is that you?
C'mon PS. I said it 50 pages ago in this thread and I'll say it again - This shit happens all the time. No one reports on it. In six months Drudge won't report on it either. He's reporting on it now to advance his own agenda; same as the original media morons. Either he needs to report on this all the time (all violent, hate-related crimes, not just the black-on-white crime) or he needs to knock it the f*ck off.
Whatever the case is, whether it happens all the time or barely happens at all, the point is it's happening far more over the last month than it was before that. Something to do with the Trayvon Martin thingy perhaps




















Night Strike wrote:thegreekdog wrote:Phatscotty wrote:thegreekdog wrote:I made a funny and you guys didn't pick up on it (Baldur's Gate quote).
Look dudes, I'm all for pointing out inconsistencies in media coverage; I'm just also pointing out Drudge's inconsistentices. I agree that the media sensationalized this and now there's all this ridiculous violence that is completely misguided (as if violence is not misguided of its own accord). But Drudge's insistence on not letting this go is annoying. I want more politics and more sharks.
It's more than ridiculous. It's deadly serious. But why don't you send Drudge a letter, telling him not to report on hate crimes anymore. That way we don't have to be bothered with what is going on around us until something bad happens to someone in our family or someone we know.
Symmetry? Natty? Is that you?
C'mon PS. I said it 50 pages ago in this thread and I'll say it again - This shit happens all the time. No one reports on it. In six months Drudge won't report on it either. He's reporting on it now to advance his own agenda; same as the original media morons. Either he needs to report on this all the time (all violent, hate-related crimes, not just the black-on-white crime) or he needs to knock it the f*ck off.
Difference between Drudge and the original media morons: only the former is posting true narratives.




















BigBallinStalin wrote:@TGD
Maybe it's what many of consumers of The Drudge demand? If they keep clicking on these types of stories, then the Drudge has a stronger incentive to keep promoting those kinds of stories.
Eventually, the consumers of race-related stories will get winded, and the sharks and politics will marginally increase in supply.




















thegreekdog wrote:Night Strike wrote:thegreekdog wrote:Phatscotty wrote:
It's more than ridiculous. It's deadly serious. But why don't you send Drudge a letter, telling him not to report on hate crimes anymore. That way we don't have to be bothered with what is going on around us until something bad happens to someone in our family or someone we know.
Symmetry? Natty? Is that you?
C'mon PS. I said it 50 pages ago in this thread and I'll say it again - This shit happens all the time. No one reports on it. In six months Drudge won't report on it either. He's reporting on it now to advance his own agenda; same as the original media morons. Either he needs to report on this all the time (all violent, hate-related crimes, not just the black-on-white crime) or he needs to knock it the f*ck off.
Difference between Drudge and the original media morons: only the former is posting true narratives.
Yes, that is true. I still haven't heard any media member apologize or even acknowledge that he or she used the wrong racial term to describe Zimmerman.

























Night Strike wrote:Symmetry wrote:I'm not sure the protesters were defined by race, except by a few right wingers who felt that the protests would erupt into racial violence. Pretty sure people of all races were kind of appalled.
Then you didn't pay attention to what was happening. When the national news opens the story by claiming Zimmerman is white, of course they were trying to promote a racial agenda. People were protesting because they were convinced that a black kid was killed by a white man, and were seeking racial justice. And the people that are now committing violent crimes are doing so against white people because they think Trayvon was killed for being black.Symmetry wrote:You say the sweetest things. Perhaps Beck is right in exposing the murderous empire of this dead child. I've sat through a fair number of your videos in the past. Almost always the same intrepid investigator, Glenn Beck. A more rational man than I might suggest that your constant referral to a single, fairly unreliable, source, might be a sign that you're not greatly open-minded in your choice of reportage.
However, I can accept the criticism that I'm closed-minded on Mr Beck. After all, even a broken clock weeps correctly twice a day, right?
Just don't demand I watch 25 minutes of the dude in the hope he gets it right at some point.
I didn't know linking to local news stories and sharing them on a national level amounted to Beck being wrong about the stories and making them up. In fact, isn't that the same thing the other people in the media did when they made the Samford, Florida case into a national story? Why aren't those other media people doing follow-ups on how there are several stories showing black people mobbing white people as "Justice for Trayvon"?
By the way, a group last year published a study on Beck's claims/predictions and found that he was correct about 93% of the time. Maybe you should listen to what he says and then investigate it for yourself before assuming he is wrong.



Symmetry wrote:I'd rather go my own way, reading news from a variety of international sources, and kind of ignore the Beck "Tears of a Clown" show. Sorry, I'm not going to sit through another 25 minutes of Beck on a Scotty link anymore. He's the fox who cried Beck at this point. Post the relevant bits, and I'll look.
Sorry, but I'm not going to go for the idea that if I don't spend a half hour on one of Scotty's posts, then I somehow don't understand it.
By the way, the links in your post don't work. I can't track down the sources.




















Phatscotty wrote:
They could apologize for fanning the imagined "F'n C#&n" comment that they propagated as well....
They played it over and over again, and again, and again.....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HNtbknt2VhE&t=4m16s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOt1wEDy0SI&t=0m43s

















Symmetry wrote:
Sorry, but I'm not going to go for the idea that if I don't spend a half hour on one of Scotty's posts, then I somehow don't understand it.

























Phatscotty wrote:Symmetry wrote:
Sorry, but I'm not going to go for the idea that if I don't spend a half hour on one of Scotty's posts, then I somehow don't understand it.
All you are saying is you won't spend a half hour on the information, but you will spend hundreds of hours having an information-less opinion.



BigBallinStalin wrote:Phatscotty wrote:
They could apologize for fanning the imagined "F'n C#&n" comment that they propagated as well....
They played it over and over again, and again, and again.....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HNtbknt2VhE&t=4m16s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOt1wEDy0SI&t=0m43s
haha, wow. This is interesting,

























Symmetry wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Symmetry wrote:
Sorry, but I'm not going to go for the idea that if I don't spend a half hour on one of Scotty's posts, then I somehow don't understand it.
All you are saying is you won't spend a half hour on the information, but you will spend hundreds of hours having an information-less opinion.
I'm about 95% sure that's not what I'm saying, but I'll allow this-
please, go on...

























Phatscotty wrote:Symmetry wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Symmetry wrote:
Sorry, but I'm not going to go for the idea that if I don't spend a half hour on one of Scotty's posts, then I somehow don't understand it.
All you are saying is you won't spend a half hour on the information, but you will spend hundreds of hours having an information-less opinion.
I'm about 95% sure that's not what I'm saying, but I'll allow this-
please, go on...
If I give you a post with a video or a quote with a source, it's usually because it's a piece of evidence that either contradicts or bolsters a previous claim, and is directly related to the discussion at hand. If you ignore it, it's like not even reading what I said, not to mention you won't get any of the context. Then, you could at that time either agree or disagree with the information or take it in as new information. For you, in the future I can time-stamp them better.
However, this clip I have posted and you are railing about is just a list of the recent hates crime along with some information about them. Maybe you can get most of the information just by watching the first 4 minutes. As a Bonus, the first 4 minutes basically cover the 4 separate hate crime links I posted along with the video. The video does us a favor, as it's easier to watch one video than it is to click and read 4 stories.
Try again?




























Phatscotty wrote:That's your opinion. I think it was a highly informative post, and many people who did not know what has been happening recently are now more informed.



Symmetry wrote:Phatscotty wrote:That's your opinion. I think it was a highly informative post, and many people who did not know what has been happening recently are now more informed.
More informed than what?

















BigBallinStalin wrote:Symmetry wrote:Phatscotty wrote:That's your opinion. I think it was a highly informative post, and many people who did not know what has been happening recently are now more informed.
More informed than what?
Your anus, from which you speaketh.
HAR HAR HAR!




























Symmetry wrote:Phatscotty wrote:That's your opinion. I think it was a highly informative post, and many people who did not know what has been happening recently are now more informed.
More informed than what?

























Symmetry wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Symmetry wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Symmetry wrote:
Sorry, but I'm not going to go for the idea that if I don't spend a half hour on one of Scotty's posts, then I somehow don't understand it.
All you are saying is you won't spend a half hour on the information, but you will spend hundreds of hours having an information-less opinion.
I'm about 95% sure that's not what I'm saying, but I'll allow this-
please, go on...
If I give you a post with a video or a quote with a source, it's usually because it's a piece of evidence that either contradicts or bolsters a previous claim, and is directly related to the discussion at hand. If you ignore it, it's like not even reading what I said, not to mention you won't get any of the context. Then, you could at that time either agree or disagree with the information or take it in as new information. For you, in the future I can time-stamp them better.
However, this clip I have posted and you are railing about is just a list of the recent hates crime along with some information about them. Maybe you can get most of the information just by watching the first 4 minutes. As a Bonus, the first 4 minutes basically cover the 4 separate hate crime links I posted along with the video. The video does us a favor, as it's easier to watch one video than it is to click and read 4 stories.
Try again?
The thing is, I did watch the first 5 minutes of that video, cause I still have a degree of faith that you'll post relevant stuff and not just dump a half hour video on a poster without reference to what they should be looking for, where the video becomes relevant to the point your making, and fair warning that Glenn Beck is going to be in it.
That last point was a joke, Scotty, but you can't dump a 25 minute video on people and expect them to work out your point, then complain that when someone calls you out on it. You're not a newbie poster. You can put a good post together.
When you do stuff like this, it looks like you know how to put a bad post together and then spend a few posts defending that terrible post.




























Users browsing this forum: No registered users