
Moderator: Community Team
huamulan wrote:If only all global economic systems could be boiled down to some pictures of smiley faces with captions.
Juan_Bottom wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Juan_Bottom wrote:
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
BigBallinStalin wrote:This is kind of accurate.
It just takes longer for people to realize the effects of inflation.
Essentially, it's a short-term "fix" with long-term consequences, which people often overlook (except Bernanke, who is aware of this).
People want something for nothing, so new money is lent into existence. This is to satisfy short-term demand, while ignoring long-term consequences. It's how the US funds deficit spending.
Many people, who demand that the government provide this or that, unknowingly also lend support to a primary cause of many of the US' problems. It's amazing to see this happen.
huamulan wrote:What kind of person pays for a car or holiday using a loan?
Timminz wrote:huamulan wrote:What kind of person pays for a car or holiday using a loan?
A car I can understand, but I don't think anyone pays for a holiday with a loan. That would be ridiculous.
Nola_Lifer wrote:Timminz wrote:huamulan wrote:What kind of person pays for a car or holiday using a loan?
A car I can understand, but I don't think anyone pays for a holiday with a loan. That would be ridiculous.
Ever heard of a credit card?
Lootifer wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:This is kind of accurate.
It just takes longer for people to realize the effects of inflation.
Essentially, it's a short-term "fix" with long-term consequences, which people often overlook (except Bernanke, who is aware of this).
People want something for nothing, so new money is lent into existence. This is to satisfy short-term demand, while ignoring long-term consequences. It's how the US funds deficit spending.
Many people, who demand that the government provide this or that, unknowingly also lend support to a primary cause of many of the US' problems. It's amazing to see this happen.
Hey you really meant it when you said you dont understand demagoguery!
Hehe, jk.
I dont think it's as black and white as you make out though. The recent spanish one is propping up banks to counter their poor investments in a housing bubble right? So sure its going to protect a few dumb banking execs, but is it not protecting many joe averages as well?
So yes the long term consequence is pretty bad (inflation); but isnt the short term consequence just as dire for your average joe?
Apologies if this is a little ignorant or under-researched; I havent thought it all through.
huamulan wrote:Using a credit card is the same as taking out a loan. What's wrong with cash/bank transfer/debit card?
huamulan wrote:Money is not being 'created' for the Spanish bank bailout. It's money lent by the European Union (i.e. the EU lends money it already has).
BigBallinStalin wrote:So, there's basically three ways to think about this issue:
If you assume that the policymakers and politicians are well-intended individuals, and that they can actually manage these economies with no significant knowledge and incentive problems, then your criticism is correct.
I tend to think that they are well-intended but lead themselves into negative, unintended outcomes.
Or, I tend to think that they are self-interested (politicians mainly), who use Keynesian economics in order to promote a sense of political control and to distribute funds to whoever they deem, so that they can secure more votes and maintain their careers.
It just depends on your assumptions. 1) well-intended with great knowledge and incentives, 2) well-intended yet lacking knowledge and/or incentives, 3) not well-intended, and/or simply self-interested and rational in that sense.
(after reading the above, I'll answer your questions. I'm just providing some background info in relation to the general tone of your post.)
Nola_Lifer wrote:Timminz wrote:huamulan wrote:What kind of person pays for a car or holiday using a loan?
A car I can understand, but I don't think anyone pays for a holiday with a loan. That would be ridiculous.
Ever heard of a credit card?
thegreekdog wrote:Nola_Lifer wrote:Timminz wrote:huamulan wrote:What kind of person pays for a car or holiday using a loan?
A car I can understand, but I don't think anyone pays for a holiday with a loan. That would be ridiculous.
Ever heard of a credit card?
Ever heard of America?
See, here in the United States, everyone deserves to have multiple automobiles, a large house, exotic vacations, and multiple big screen televisions. If they cannot pay for it with cash, they can pay for it with credit cards or mortgages. If they cannot pay the credit cards or mortgages, then they get bailed out. Because everyone should be equal. /rant.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users