Page 1 of 1

Dear PeeScotty

PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 11:06 pm
by nietzsche
stop getting Woodruff angry.

Re: Dear PeeScotty

PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 12:04 am
by HapSmo19
Woody just needs to leave for good for a while again.

Re: Dear PeeScotty

PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 5:24 pm
by Symmetry
HapSmo19 wrote:Woody just needs to leave for good for a while again.


I'd welcome a good dose of Woodruff's honesty even if it's caustic over the dishonest spam Scotty has been pulling off recently. I'd rather have an honest dialogue with Spock than 5 pages trying to get the dodge king to say something concrete.

Re: Dear PeeScotty

PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 5:25 pm
by Metsfanmax
Symmetry wrote:
HapSmo19 wrote:Woody just needs to leave for good for a while again.


I'd welcome a good dose of Woodruff's honesty even if it's caustic over the dishonest spam Scotty has been pulling off recently. I'd rather have an honest dialogue with Spock than 5 pages trying to get the dodge king to say something concrete.


Looks like Symm took saxi's advice and moved the campaigning elsewhere. In a strange twist, though, he's actually defending his nearest competitor in the poll!

Re: Dear PeeScotty

PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 5:28 pm
by Symmetry
Metsfanmax wrote:
Symmetry wrote:
HapSmo19 wrote:Woody just needs to leave for good for a while again.


I'd welcome a good dose of Woodruff's honesty even if it's caustic over the dishonest spam Scotty has been pulling off recently. I'd rather have an honest dialogue with Spock than 5 pages trying to get the dodge king to say something concrete.


Looks like Symm took saxi's advice and moved the campaigning elsewhere. In a strange twist, though, he's actually defending his nearest competitor in the poll!


You do realise that you're not a sports commentator and that you're replying to stuff I wrote here, right? It'd be kind of embarrassing if you hadn't figured that out, after all,

Re: Dear PeeScotty

PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 5:54 pm
by Metsfanmax
Symmetry wrote:
Metsfanmax wrote:
Symmetry wrote:
HapSmo19 wrote:Woody just needs to leave for good for a while again.


I'd welcome a good dose of Woodruff's honesty even if it's caustic over the dishonest spam Scotty has been pulling off recently. I'd rather have an honest dialogue with Spock than 5 pages trying to get the dodge king to say something concrete.


Looks like Symm took saxi's advice and moved the campaigning elsewhere. In a strange twist, though, he's actually defending his nearest competitor in the poll!


You do realise that you're not a sports commentator and that you're replying to stuff I wrote here, right? It'd be kind of embarrassing if you hadn't figured that out, after all,


Shit. Thanks for the catch, bro.

Re: Dear PeeScotty

PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 5:55 pm
by Symmetry
Metsfanmax wrote:
Symmetry wrote:
Metsfanmax wrote:
Symmetry wrote:
HapSmo19 wrote:Woody just needs to leave for good for a while again.


I'd welcome a good dose of Woodruff's honesty even if it's caustic over the dishonest spam Scotty has been pulling off recently. I'd rather have an honest dialogue with Spock than 5 pages trying to get the dodge king to say something concrete.


Looks like Symm took saxi's advice and moved the campaigning elsewhere. In a strange twist, though, he's actually defending his nearest competitor in the poll!


You do realise that you're not a sports commentator and that you're replying to stuff I wrote here, right? It'd be kind of embarrassing if you hadn't figured that out, after all,


Shit. Thanks for the catch, bro.


The Symmetry collective tries its best.

Re: Dear PeeScotty

PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 6:09 pm
by Phatscotty
Symmetry wrote:
HapSmo19 wrote:Woody just needs to leave for good for a while again.


I'd welcome a good dose of Woodruff's honesty even if it's caustic over the dishonest spam Scotty has been pulling off recently. I'd rather have an honest dialogue with Spock than 5 pages trying to get the dodge king to say something concrete.


Yo chik she so thirs-T

Re: Dear PeeScotty

PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 6:11 pm
by Metsfanmax
Symmetry wrote:
Metsfanmax wrote:
Symmetry wrote:
Metsfanmax wrote:
Symmetry wrote:
HapSmo19 wrote:Woody just needs to leave for good for a while again.


I'd welcome a good dose of Woodruff's honesty even if it's caustic over the dishonest spam Scotty has been pulling off recently. I'd rather have an honest dialogue with Spock than 5 pages trying to get the dodge king to say something concrete.


Looks like Symm took saxi's advice and moved the campaigning elsewhere. In a strange twist, though, he's actually defending his nearest competitor in the poll!


You do realise that you're not a sports commentator and that you're replying to stuff I wrote here, right? It'd be kind of embarrassing if you hadn't figured that out, after all,


Shit. Thanks for the catch, bro.


The Symmetry collective tries its best.


Wait, no, I'm getting word that I am in fact a sports commentator. Sorry to disappoint.

Re: Dear PeeScotty

PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 6:24 pm
by Phatscotty
Symmetry wrote:
Metsfanmax wrote:
Symmetry wrote:
Metsfanmax wrote:
Symmetry wrote:
HapSmo19 wrote:Woody just needs to leave for good for a while again.


I'd welcome a good dose of Woodruff's honesty even if it's caustic over the dishonest spam Scotty has been pulling off recently. I'd rather have an honest dialogue with Spock than 5 pages trying to get the dodge king to say something concrete.


Looks like Symm took saxi's advice and moved the campaigning elsewhere. In a strange twist, though, he's actually defending his nearest competitor in the poll!


You do realise that you're not a sports commentator and that you're replying to stuff I wrote here, right? It'd be kind of embarrassing if you hadn't figured that out, after all,


Shit. Thanks for the catch, bro.


The Symmetry collective tries its best.


Let the suicide doors up