Conquer Club

Looks like I voted the same way as uncle saxi.

Metsfanmax wrote:Looks like I voted the same way as uncle saxi.

As the ballot designer I am exercising impartiality and not voting. Just like the Chief Elections Officer of Canada.

saxitoxin wrote:

Metsfanmax wrote:Looks like I voted the same way as uncle saxi.

As the ballot designer I am exercising impartiality and not voting. Just like the Chief Elections Officer of Canada.

Putting Symmetry as the first option was a low blow.

Metsfanmax wrote:

saxitoxin wrote:

Metsfanmax wrote:Looks like I voted the same way as uncle saxi.

As the ballot designer I am exercising impartiality and not voting. Just like the Chief Elections Officer of Canada.

Putting Symmetry as the first option was a low blow.

The order of nominees was randomly compiled by my laptop.

(Yes, I have a quantum laptop.)

Meh- Saxi posts almost as many whiny poll threads as Nietzsche for the popularity of other posters. I take it in my stride.

Symmetry wrote:Meh- Saxi posts almost as many whiny poll threads as Nietzsche for the popularity of other posters. I take it in my stride.

No campaigning for votes in this thread, please.

I smell the approach of a trolling conviction.

saxitoxin wrote:

Symmetry wrote:Meh- Saxi posts almost as many whiny poll threads as Nietzsche for the popularity of other posters. I take it in my stride.

No campaigning for votes in this thread, please.

Don't make this more dramatic or homophobic than it is already.

saxitoxin wrote:

Symmetry wrote:Meh- Saxi posts almost as many whiny poll threads as Nietzsche for the popularity of other posters. I take it in my stride.

No campaigning for votes in this thread, please.

I lol'ed so hard.

Symmetry wrote:Don't make this more dramatic or homophobic that it is already.

You've been previously warned about campaigning for votes this close to the polling place.

saxitoxin wrote:

Symmetry wrote:Don't make this more dramatic or homophobic than it is already.

You've been previously warned about campaigning for votes this close to the polling place.

Are you saying that you're an asshole?

saxitoxin wrote:

Symmetry wrote:Meh- Saxi posts almost as many whiny poll threads as Nietzsche for the popularity of other posters. I take it in my stride.

No campaigning for votes in this thread, please.

saxitoxin wrote:

Symmetry wrote:Don't make this more dramatic or homophobic that it is already.

You've been previously warned about campaigning for votes this close to the polling place.

nietzsche wrote:

saxitoxin wrote:

Symmetry wrote:Meh- Saxi posts almost as many whiny poll threads as Nietzsche for the popularity of other posters. I take it in my stride.

No campaigning for votes in this thread, please.

saxitoxin wrote:

Symmetry wrote:Don't make this more dramatic or homophobic that it is already.

You've been previously warned about campaigning for votes this close to the polling place.

Well, I'm convinced.

how am I not winning?

Army of GOD wrote:how am I not winning?

I'm rigging any polls to prevent you from winning.

BMO

rdsrds2120 wrote:

Army of GOD wrote:how am I not winning?

I'm rigging any polls to prevent you from whining.

BMO

Fixed

I vote Symmetry and AOG.

both Drama Queens, but for some reason I like one of them and NOT the other.

jimboston wrote:I vote Symmetry and AOG.

both Drama Queens, but for some reason I like one of them and NOT the other.

Ah, the drama-you realise you're posting under your Jim account this time, right?

jimboston wrote:I vote Symmetry and AOG.

both Drama Queens, but for some reason I like one of them and NOT the other.

Because one of them puts out and the other doesn't?

Symmetry wrote:

jimboston wrote:I vote Symmetry and AOG.

both Drama Queens, but for some reason I like one of them and NOT the other.

Ah, the drama-you realise you're posting under your Jim account this time, right?

Please elaborate...

jimboston wrote:I vote Symmetry and AOG.

both Drama Queens, but for some reason I like one of them and NOT the other.

The reason you like one and not the other is it's easier to like a two-dimensional poster than a three-dimensional one.

jimboston wrote:

Symmetry wrote:

jimboston wrote:I vote Symmetry and AOG.

both Drama Queens, but for some reason I like one of them and NOT the other.

Ah, the drama-you realise you're posting under your Jim account this time, right?

Please elaborate...

Perhaps you might elaborate on your post:

jimboston wrote:

Symmetry wrote:

thegreekdog wrote:

Symmetry wrote:blah, blah, blah

Why?

Why what?

Why did you bump this topic when it was essentially dead?

Why have you not answered Jim's question? Are you afraid?

Link

You do realise you were logged on as Jim when you posted that, right?

Funkyterrance wrote:

jimboston wrote:I vote Symmetry and AOG.

both Drama Queens, but for some reason I like one of them and NOT the other.

The reason you like one and not the other is it's easier to like a two-dimensional poster than a three-dimensional one.

Are not all posters three-dimensional? A poster may look two-dimensional because it appears flat; however, upon closer inspection, we realize that it is in fact three-dimensional.

BigBallinStalin wrote:

Funkyterrance wrote:

jimboston wrote:I vote Symmetry and AOG.

both Drama Queens, but for some reason I like one of them and NOT the other.

The reason you like one and not the other is it's easier to like a two-dimensional poster than a three-dimensional one.

Are not all posters three-dimensional? A poster may look two-dimensional because it appears flat; however, upon closer inspection, we realize that it is in fact three-dimensional.

Well, I'm glad you asked as I feel the two can easily be misinterpreted. I will ask you this, however:
Have you ever been to an art gallery and think while viewing a piece: "There is really no substance here but it's so vague that I can fill in the blanks to make it meaningful."? I don't credit this meaning to the artist, I credit it to the viewer.