Conquer Club

Ray Rider wrote:I agree with everything you said here. I was pretty surprised when it seemed like all the conservatives jumped on the Romney bandwagon even though he was the last-ditch nominee after every other candidate had been tried and failed. He carried with him a lot of baggage and was a big-government politician same as Obama, and yet many conservatives didn't seem to blink an eye when jumping to support him (we all witnessed the transformation of PS before our very eyes). I personally think a huge opportunity was missed here; when faced with two disappointing presidential candidates, if those dissatisfied with the status quo (especially conservatives, libertarians, and small government advocates as a whole) had thrown their support behind a 3rd party candidate, that could've had a game-changing effect on the next election down the road. Instead, two billions dollars and months of campaigning went down the drain with absolutely no change on the horizon. This election (and the opportunity for change in the next election) was completely wasted. How long must this continue?

Neoteny wrote:Smallpox doesn't kill people. Secondary infections kill people.

What do you do if you see a man with no skin running around your front yard? The smallpox isn't working fast enough. Hit him with a dose of hemorrhagic fever.

Neoteny wrote:

Neoteny wrote:Smallpox doesn't kill people. Secondary infections kill people.

What do you do if you see a man with no skin running around your front yard? The smallpox isn't working fast enough. Hit him with a dose of hemorrhagic fever.

Readable Score: 69
Grade Level: 4

Do I win?

Ray Rider wrote:I would agree, although even in terms of economics there seem to be a lot who are propounding a philosophy of spreading the wealth around, raising taxes much higher--specifically on the rich, greater governmental regulations, more Keynesian economics, more protectionist policies (to attempt to stop jobs from leaving the continent), etc. which I would tend to see as strong "left-wing" policies. I guess you don't see many out in the open advocating communism and state takeovers of business, but instead there are those who were clearly in favor of state takeovers in the form of bailouts to the auto industry and greater governmental oversight in areas like that. I think the reason you don't see more people on the extreme left economically on the site is because we have some pretty strong capitalistic posters who tend to dominate those discussions

2dimes wrote:no u

Army of GOD wrote:f*ck your mother

Enter text below to check Readable Score & Grade Level

Readable Score: 38 (The higher the score the easier the article is to read!)
Grade Level: 9

Part of the problem is that evolutionary science can't even determine the definition of it's own words and confuse mutation with Darwinian evolution. Hell, evolutionary science has yet to determine what the word "Species" means? Even among themselves they can't get the meaning right on the words that they use and they call that evidence?

jonesthecurl wrote:V iceroy:

Enter text below to check Readable Score & Grade Level

Readable Score: 38 (The higher the score the easier the article is to read!)
Grade Level: 9

Part of the problem is that evolutionary science can't even determine the definition of it's own words and confuse mutation with Darwinian evolution. Hell, evolutionary science has yet to determine what the word "Species" means? Even among themselves they can't get the meaning right on the words that they use and they call that evidence?

2dimes wrote:That site's no good.

Readable Score: 80 (The higher the score the easier the article is to read!)
Grade Level: 2

Like anything I write is easy to read.

2dimes wrote:no u

Army of GOD wrote:Readable Score: 94 (The higher the score the easier the article is to read!)
Grade Level: 0

Army of GOD wrote:f*ck your mother

Ray Rider wrote:The best example of highest grade level (at least 12) combined with highest readability score will be copied into this opening post!

adulation stupendous hilarity magnanimous ambidextrous antidisestabslishmentarianism

Hello. My name is Bob. I'm here to tell you what your name is. Your name is Bob.

Today I was walking through Hendon. With Ronnie and Barny Boatman.
We were walking 3 abreast, therefore blocking the whole pavement.
A big bloke was walking towards us, he was wearing a blue business suit, pork pie hat, cravat and shiny alligator shoes.
I recognised him as Stan the Snide, he was an old time coppers nark from Wembley way.
I whispered to Ron I wanted him sorting, Ron tipped me the wink and stood nose to nose with Stan.
"Oi, you nonce, Joe told me you`re a snide, slag, grass and nark"
"What abaht it?" Stan said
"I don`t like geezers like you pal" Ron said, "I`m sorting you right here"
Stan laughed, but froze when Ron pulled his cosh from his suit pocket.
Ron coshed him 3 times, we left Stan on the pavement. And continued into the heart of Hendon for a home game with Ross and Ram

Did I one you six be to am?

Everybody's inexpressible transubstantiation.

Supercalifragiliticexpialidocious disestablishmentarianism.

supersupersupersupersupersupertittiestittiestitties

T h i s i s a f u c k i n g s t o o p i d p r o g r am!

;klljnqf;lnca;lnvc;lknvas;klnv a/,s ;kldfagvboa[ijv';am ,vczb ljVCPOa[f Hnkdvc S,V ,cx ,zxzkncM dnvcDLNCcnDS 'LKNALNAOba

jonesthecurl wrote:Ok suss this one: grade 2, readabilty 84....

;klljnqf;lnca;lnvc;lknvas;klnv a/,s ;kldfagvboa[ijv';am ,vczb ljVCPOa[f Hnkdvc S,V ,cx ,zxzkncM dnvcDLNCcnDS 'LKNALNAOba

Army of GOD wrote:

jonesthecurl wrote:Ok suss this one: grade 2, readabilty 84....

;klljnqf;lnca;lnvc;lknvas;klnv a/,s ;kldfagvboa[ijv';am ,vczb ljVCPOa[f Hnkdvc S,V ,cx ,zxzkncM dnvcDLNCcnDS 'LKNALNAOba

You're just not as articulate as I am.