Conquer Club

“In conclusion, The People’s Republic of China demands that America stop using their cry of human rights violations against other sovereign nations in order to declare war on them to steal their resources when America flagrantly violates the human rights of Afro-descendants and other minorities within its own country.”

MegaProphet wrote:http://sfbayview.com/2011/china-denounces-america%e2%80%99s-treatment-of-afro-descendants/

“In conclusion, The People’s Republic of China demands that America stop using their cry of human rights violations against other sovereign nations in order to declare war on them to steal their resources when America flagrantly violates the human rights of Afro-descendants and other minorities within its own country.”

Woodruff wrote:

MegaProphet wrote:http://sfbayview.com/2011/china-denounces-america%e2%80%99s-treatment-of-afro-descendants/

“In conclusion, The People’s Republic of China demands that America stop using their cry of human rights violations against other sovereign nations in order to declare war on them to steal their resources when America flagrantly violates the human rights of Afro-descendants and other minorities within its own country.”

Well...they're certainly not wrong that the United States has some pretty serious human rights issues that need to be resolved. That being said...I'm afraid it becomes difficult for me to give a shit what China, of all countries, thinks about them.

Serbia wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

MegaProphet wrote:http://sfbayview.com/2011/china-denounces-america%e2%80%99s-treatment-of-afro-descendants/

“In conclusion, The People’s Republic of China demands that America stop using their cry of human rights violations against other sovereign nations in order to declare war on them to steal their resources when America flagrantly violates the human rights of Afro-descendants and other minorities within its own country.”

Well...they're certainly not wrong that the United States has some pretty serious human rights issues that need to be resolved. That being said...I'm afraid it becomes difficult for me to give a shit what China, of all countries, thinks about them.

That need to be resolved? As in what, we're still currently committing "pretty serious human rights" violations? What exactly are we talking about here?

Bollocks.

Phatscotty wrote:Can we see some examples of "flagrant human rights violations"?

Serbia wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

MegaProphet wrote:http://sfbayview.com/2011/china-denounces-america%e2%80%99s-treatment-of-afro-descendants/

“In conclusion, The People’s Republic of China demands that America stop using their cry of human rights violations against other sovereign nations in order to declare war on them to steal their resources when America flagrantly violates the human rights of Afro-descendants and other minorities within its own country.”

Well...they're certainly not wrong that the United States has some pretty serious human rights issues that need to be resolved. That being said...I'm afraid it becomes difficult for me to give a shit what China, of all countries, thinks about them.

That need to be resolved? As in what, we're still currently committing "pretty serious human rights" violations? What exactly are we talking about here?

Phatscotty wrote:

Serbia wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

MegaProphet wrote:http://sfbayview.com/2011/china-denounces-america%e2%80%99s-treatment-of-afro-descendants/

“In conclusion, The People’s Republic of China demands that America stop using their cry of human rights violations against other sovereign nations in order to declare war on them to steal their resources when America flagrantly violates the human rights of Afro-descendants and other minorities within its own country.”

Well...they're certainly not wrong that the United States has some pretty serious human rights issues that need to be resolved. That being said...I'm afraid it becomes difficult for me to give a shit what China, of all countries, thinks about them.

That need to be resolved? As in what, we're still currently committing "pretty serious human rights" violations? What exactly are we talking about here?

Bollocks.

WOW! Let me guess: Not handing out unlimited food stamps and free housing to lazy bums is a "flagrant human rights violation"? More seriously, I will predict that it's a human rights violation for any citizen to not be taken care of cradle to the grave by Socialism and redistribution of the wealth.

Phatscotty wrote:Can we see some examples of "flagrant human rights violations"?

Did we starve to death 60 million or something?

Woodruff wrote:

Phatscotty wrote:Can we see some examples of "flagrant human rights violations"?

Sure, here are three pretty current ones just off the top of my head:

1. The continued existence of the Guantanamo Bay, Cuba detention camp.

2. The use of torture in interrogation of military prisoners.

3. Bradley Manning is FINALLY going to trial, but not until after being held without charges and in conditions that certainly would qualify as cruel and unusual for a tremendous length of time. There's no question in my mind that he's finally going to trial only through the outcry about how he has been held.

Do you guys actually not consider these to be flagrant human rights violations or were you just hoping I wouldn't think of them?

thegreekdog wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

Phatscotty wrote:Can we see some examples of "flagrant human rights violations"?

Sure, here are three pretty current ones just off the top of my head:

1. The continued existence of the Guantanamo Bay, Cuba detention camp.

2. The use of torture in interrogation of military prisoners.

3. Bradley Manning is FINALLY going to trial, but not until after being held without charges and in conditions that certainly would qualify as cruel and unusual for a tremendous length of time. There's no question in my mind that he's finally going to trial only through the outcry about how he has been held.

Do you guys actually not consider these to be flagrant human rights violations or were you just hoping I wouldn't think of them?

I think Phatscotty was talking about human rights violations relative to Afro-descendants.

Woodruff wrote:

thegreekdog wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

Phatscotty wrote:Can we see some examples of "flagrant human rights violations"?

Sure, here are three pretty current ones just off the top of my head:

1. The continued existence of the Guantanamo Bay, Cuba detention camp.

2. The use of torture in interrogation of military prisoners.

3. Bradley Manning is FINALLY going to trial, but not until after being held without charges and in conditions that certainly would qualify as cruel and unusual for a tremendous length of time. There's no question in my mind that he's finally going to trial only through the outcry about how he has been held.

Do you guys actually not consider these to be flagrant human rights violations or were you just hoping I wouldn't think of them?

I think Phatscotty was talking about human rights violations relative to Afro-descendants.

Well he certainly will have now that you've given him that excuse, but that's not remotely what he said (take a look at what he underlined). I simply responded to his idiotic question.

I guess these things I listed don't count as human rights violations since they weren't against descendents from Africa? As far as that goes, I would consider the tenor of the War on Drugs to qualify, as well.

thegreekdog wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

thegreekdog wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

Phatscotty wrote:Can we see some examples of "flagrant human rights violations"?

Sure, here are three pretty current ones just off the top of my head:

1. The continued existence of the Guantanamo Bay, Cuba detention camp.

2. The use of torture in interrogation of military prisoners.

3. Bradley Manning is FINALLY going to trial, but not until after being held without charges and in conditions that certainly would qualify as cruel and unusual for a tremendous length of time. There's no question in my mind that he's finally going to trial only through the outcry about how he has been held.

Do you guys actually not consider these to be flagrant human rights violations or were you just hoping I wouldn't think of them?

I think Phatscotty was talking about human rights violations relative to Afro-descendants.

Well he certainly will have now that you've given him that excuse, but that's not remotely what he said (take a look at what he underlined). I simply responded to his idiotic question.

I guess these things I listed don't count as human rights violations since they weren't against descendents from Africa? As far as that goes, I would consider the tenor of the War on Drugs to qualify, as well.

Those things qualify as human rights violations (in my opinion) but not against afro-descendants. I'm not entirely sure about the war on drugs being a human rights violation against afro-descendants.

I think "afro-descendant" should take the place of "african american."

BigBallinStalin wrote:More whites get the death penalty than blacks. RACISM!

MegaProphet wrote:

thegreekdog wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

thegreekdog wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

Phatscotty wrote:Can we see some examples of "flagrant human rights violations"?

Sure, here are three pretty current ones just off the top of my head:

1. The continued existence of the Guantanamo Bay, Cuba detention camp.

2. The use of torture in interrogation of military prisoners.

3. Bradley Manning is FINALLY going to trial, but not until after being held without charges and in conditions that certainly would qualify as cruel and unusual for a tremendous length of time. There's no question in my mind that he's finally going to trial only through the outcry about how he has been held.

Do you guys actually not consider these to be flagrant human rights violations or were you just hoping I wouldn't think of them?

I think Phatscotty was talking about human rights violations relative to Afro-descendants.

Well he certainly will have now that you've given him that excuse, but that's not remotely what he said (take a look at what he underlined). I simply responded to his idiotic question.

I guess these things I listed don't count as human rights violations since they weren't against descendents from Africa? As far as that goes, I would consider the tenor of the War on Drugs to qualify, as well.

Those things qualify as human rights violations (in my opinion) but not against afro-descendants. I'm not entirely sure about the war on drugs being a human rights violation against afro-descendants.

I think "afro-descendant" should take the place of "african american."

The article doesn't talk about the drug war too much, but the fact that while 75-80% of drug users are white only 25% of those arrested for drugs are white and only 12% of drug users are black yet make up 55% of drug arrests is telling.

thegreekdog wrote:

MegaProphet wrote:

thegreekdog wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

thegreekdog wrote:

Woodruff wrote:
Sure, here are three pretty current ones just off the top of my head:

1. The continued existence of the Guantanamo Bay, Cuba detention camp.

2. The use of torture in interrogation of military prisoners.

3. Bradley Manning is FINALLY going to trial, but not until after being held without charges and in conditions that certainly would qualify as cruel and unusual for a tremendous length of time. There's no question in my mind that he's finally going to trial only through the outcry about how he has been held.

Do you guys actually not consider these to be flagrant human rights violations or were you just hoping I wouldn't think of them?

I think Phatscotty was talking about human rights violations relative to Afro-descendants.

Well he certainly will have now that you've given him that excuse, but that's not remotely what he said (take a look at what he underlined). I simply responded to his idiotic question.

I guess these things I listed don't count as human rights violations since they weren't against descendents from Africa? As far as that goes, I would consider the tenor of the War on Drugs to qualify, as well.

Those things qualify as human rights violations (in my opinion) but not against afro-descendants. I'm not entirely sure about the war on drugs being a human rights violation against afro-descendants.

I think "afro-descendant" should take the place of "african american."

The article doesn't talk about the drug war too much, but the fact that while 75-80% of drug users are white only 25% of those arrested for drugs are white and only 12% of drug users are black yet make up 55% of drug arrests is telling.

Telling of what? Human rights violations?

Woodruff wrote:Sure, here are three pretty current ones just off the top of my head:

1. The continued existence of the Guantanamo Bay, Cuba detention camp.

2. The use of torture in interrogation of military prisoners.

3. Bradley Manning is FINALLY going to trial, but not until after being held without charges and in conditions that certainly would qualify as cruel and unusual for a tremendous length of time. There's no question in my mind that he's finally going to trial only through the outcry about how he has been held.

Do you guys actually not consider these to be flagrant human rights violations or were you just hoping I wouldn't think of them?

MegaProphet wrote:

thegreekdog wrote:

MegaProphet wrote:

thegreekdog wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

thegreekdog wrote:
I think Phatscotty was talking about human rights violations relative to Afro-descendants.

Well he certainly will have now that you've given him that excuse, but that's not remotely what he said (take a look at what he underlined). I simply responded to his idiotic question.

I guess these things I listed don't count as human rights violations since they weren't against descendents from Africa? As far as that goes, I would consider the tenor of the War on Drugs to qualify, as well.

Those things qualify as human rights violations (in my opinion) but not against afro-descendants. I'm not entirely sure about the war on drugs being a human rights violation against afro-descendants.

I think "afro-descendant" should take the place of "african american."

The article doesn't talk about the drug war too much, but the fact that while 75-80% of drug users are white only 25% of those arrested for drugs are white and only 12% of drug users are black yet make up 55% of drug arrests is telling.

Telling of what? Human rights violations?

Of the way black people are treated in the US

thegreekdog wrote:I think Phatscotty was talking about human rights violations relative to Afro-descendants.

Phatscotty wrote:
If you are going to buy/sell/possess drugs, you are taking a risk.

Phatscotty wrote:
WOW! Let me guess: Not handing out unlimited food stamps and free housing to lazy bums is a "flagrant human rights violation"? More seriously, I will predict that it's a human rights violation for any citizen to not be taken care of cradle to the grave by Socialism and redistribution of the wealth. I agree though, China is in no position to make these claims. China is trolling, and so is the thread.

I'm pretty sure these guys will conclude Freedom itself is a flagrant human rights violation

Iliad wrote:

Phatscotty wrote:
If you are going to buy/sell/possess drugs, you are taking a risk.

Actually those caught with drug demeanours re disproportionately punished if they are black.

Phatscotty wrote:
WOW! Let me guess: Not handing out unlimited food stamps and free housing to lazy bums is a "flagrant human rights violation"? More seriously, I will predict that it's a human rights violation for any citizen to not be taken care of cradle to the grave by Socialism and redistribution of the wealth. I agree though, China is in no position to make these claims. China is trolling, and so is the thread.

I'm pretty sure these guys will conclude Freedom itself is a flagrant human rights violation

How about injecting unsuspecting African-Americans with syphilis? Even the 20th century was still littered with pretty flagrant events like that.