Conquer Club

I seen today a group in Arizona I think, can prove Obam birth certificate is a fake. It was posted by my uncle on facebook. It was a story from a local news channel . The group set out to prove it was real but after 6 months and over 2200 hours of investigation they found that it was made from a computer. There is no paper copy and was manufactured online. They can disassemble it piece by piece. Supposedly you cant do it with a paper copy. Has anyone else seen or heard this?

warmonger1981 wrote:I seen today a group in Arizona I think, can prove Obam birth certificate is a fake. It was posted by my uncle on facebook. It was a story from a local news channel . The group set out to prove it was real but after 6 months and over 2200 hours of investigation they found that it was made from a computer. There is no paper copy and was manufactured online. They can disassemble it piece by piece. Supposedly you cant do it with a paper copy. Has anyone else seen or heard this?

I've totally heard about this. I think I also heard about it from your uncle on facebook of the local news channel in Arizona. I am glad it has now been proven that it was made from a computer. Because it was made from a computer, there can be no paper copy and it was manufactured online. Disassembly piece by piece is key evidence. Computers trump paper.


--Andy

AndyDufresne wrote:

warmonger1981 wrote:I seen today a group in Arizona I think, can prove Obam birth certificate is a fake. It was posted by my uncle on facebook. It was a story from a local news channel . The group set out to prove it was real but after 6 months and over 2200 hours of investigation they found that it was made from a computer. There is no paper copy and was manufactured online. They can disassemble it piece by piece. Supposedly you cant do it with a paper copy. Has anyone else seen or heard this?

I've totally heard about this. I think I also heard about it from your uncle on facebook of the local news channel in Arizona. I am glad it has now been proven that it was made from a computer. Because it was made from a computer, there can be no paper copy and it was manufactured online. Disassembly piece by piece is key evidence. Computers trump paper.


--Andy

Rocks trump bananas--and computers--and paper. You lose, sir.

Of course! That Hawaiian newspaper with a birth announcement was lying all along!

This is the worst thing ever. We should impeach Obama. Trampling all over the Constitution is one thing, but being expelled from a vagina in some other country is taking it too far.

Frigidus, did you hear about it from warmonger1981's uncle on facebook from the local news in Arizona too???????


--Andy

Yo guys I heard he was really born in Kenya. Have you also heard this

This isn't Rocket Science and known facts resolved PRIOR TO THE 2008 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION are not going to change.
and ALL THESE FUCKING NUMBNUT SPHINCTER LIPPED CONSERVATIVE IDIOTS
NEED TO MOVE ON.

warmonger1981 wrote:I seen today a group in Arizona I think, can prove Obama birth certificate is a fake.

You mean that Sheriff and his "Cold Case Posse" who have submitted evidence in a court somewhere? Yes. It's old news. Nothing to see here, citizen. Move along.

Oh there is also evidence that his draft card with the two digit year stamp is also a fake as well.

There are a few people on the Sean Hannity forums who argue this case but the faithful who love their mamma llama who some call Obama chant the glories of yo-nanna and act like (well like people here).

That's the strange thing about Obama; everything about him is either a lie, a "composite" (the women from "Dreams from my Father" never existed) or wishful thinking fantasy.

If he says "It's a sunny day," bring an umbrella.

Besides, we all know Obama is a Vulcan ... isn't that obvious?

Andy, I wouldn't suggest fucking a banana. It simply splits apart, and you get banana all over your hands. Be wise and use superior substitutes.

warmonger1981 wrote:Mod edit: quote removed

Well, that escalated quickly.

warmonger1981 wrote:Mod edit: quote removed

You're*

warmonger1981 wrote:Mod edit: quote removed

wear*

Bollocks.

You're all WRONG.

Obama was indeed born in Hawaii but it was pre-1949 before they became the 50th state, so therefore he can only be president of Hawaii and is not the president of the other 49 states.

BigBallinStalin wrote:Andy, I wouldn't suggest fucking a banana. It simply splits apart, and you get banana all over your hands. Be wise and use superior substitutes.

Indeed; I would recommend a plantain.

Wasn't someone just mentioning how politics here is more civil than religion? Your honor, I rest my case.

tzor wrote:Wasn't someone just mentioning how politics here is more civil than religion? Your honor, I rest my case.

Well, here's the same poster on the subject of religion...

Alright f*ck heads. Obviously your girlfriends. smell chum in the water. They are all coming out of the wood work like a bunch of sharks defending a loved one. I done use spell check first of all. Crispy you are a prick for trying to act all " I'm all above this guys intelligence". Andy seems to jump into other peoples shit. Go eat a banana or take the one outta your ASS. And where the f*ck did comic boy come from. Go stick your head in a superman comic.

warmonger1981 wrote:Admin Edit

1. That is entirely no fun.

2. How come I never got an "admin edit"? I obviously need to upgrade my insults around here.

Woodruff wrote:

warmonger1981 wrote:Admin Edit

1. That is entirely no fun.

2. How come I never got an "admin edit"? I obviously need to upgrade my insults around here.

The post was edited because it violated the guidelines, not because I thought it'd be "fun".
Also, you haven't gotten an admin edit because you stay within the guidelines, mostly .

blakebowling wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

warmonger1981 wrote:Admin Edit

1. That is entirely no fun.

2. How come I never got an "admin edit"? I obviously need to upgrade my insults around here.

The post was edited because it violated the guidelines, not because I thought it'd be "fun".

Exactly. It is now entirely no fun at all! Precisely my point.

blakebowling wrote:Also, you haven't gotten an admin edit because you stay within the guidelines, mostly .

That's an intriguing idea, given my history of 3-month bans...

Granted, I didn't see his post before it was edited, but I suspect I may have posted something...uh...at least marginally more inflammatory in these fora previously (resulting in one of my aforementioned 3-month bans).

No, mate, you haven't.

jonesthecurl wrote:No, mate, you haven't.

It was that bad?

Wow...I'm actually quite surprised, as I haven't seen that sort of thing come from him previously.

Now I'm disappointed that I didn't see it. You may have ruined my Wednesday, you bastards!

It was nastier than the thing I reposted about the sharks coming out of the woodwork.

Woodruff wrote:

blakebowling wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

warmonger1981 wrote:Admin Edit

1. That is entirely no fun.

2. How come I never got an "admin edit"? I obviously need to upgrade my insults around here.

The post was edited because it violated the guidelines, not because I thought it'd be "fun".

Exactly. It is now entirely no fun at all! Precisely my point.

blakebowling wrote:Also, you haven't gotten an admin edit because you stay within the guidelines, mostly .

That's an intriguing idea, given my history of 3-month bans...

Granted, I didn't see his post before it was edited, but I suspect I may have posted something...uh...at least marginally more inflammatory in these fora previously (resulting in one of my aforementioned 3-month bans).

I would like to think that you are too intelligent for that, Woodruff
plus, the length of bans isn't necessarily based on your last infraction, but on your previous history

Woodruff wrote:
Now I'm disappointed that I didn't see it. You may have ruined my Wednesday, you bastards!

Without giving anything away, you're not even in the ballpark..or even the same town with that one

jonesthecurl wrote:It was nastier than the thing I reposted about the sharks coming out of the woodwork.

Well...I sorta thought that one was kind of tame. <smile>

TeeGee wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

blakebowling wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

warmonger1981 wrote:Admin Edit

1. That is entirely no fun.

2. How come I never got an "admin edit"? I obviously need to upgrade my insults around here.

The post was edited because it violated the guidelines, not because I thought it'd be "fun".

Exactly. It is now entirely no fun at all! Precisely my point.

blakebowling wrote:Also, you haven't gotten an admin edit because you stay within the guidelines, mostly .

That's an intriguing idea, given my history of 3-month bans...

Granted, I didn't see his post before it was edited, but I suspect I may have posted something...uh...at least marginally more inflammatory in these fora previously (resulting in one of my aforementioned 3-month bans).

I would like to think that you are too intelligent for that, Woodruff

I like to think that I am too, but I might be biased and the evidence of my bans states otherwise. <smile>

TeeGee wrote:plus, the length of bans isn't necessarily based on your last infraction, but on your previous history

I'm nothing if not consistent.