Page 1 of 1

U.S. Geo-Ancestry

PostPosted: Sat Sep 28, 2013 8:08 pm
by Phatscotty
Pretty cool, always thinkin of you guys!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... today.html

Image

Re: U.S. Geo-Ancestry

PostPosted: Sat Sep 28, 2013 9:10 pm
by thegreekdog
That's a lot of Germans.

Re: U.S. Geo-Ancestry

PostPosted: Sat Sep 28, 2013 10:06 pm
by Nobunaga
No Poles? That's odd. If Poles had their own color, Cleveland would be solid (that color).

Re: U.S. Geo-Ancestry

PostPosted: Sat Sep 28, 2013 10:20 pm
by warmonger1981
Look at all those illegal aliens. Merica needs more Mericans. Mostly Nazis and Africants.

PostPosted: Sat Sep 28, 2013 10:22 pm
by 2dimes
The Polish folks are listed as other in Luzerne county.

Re: U.S. Geo-Ancestry

PostPosted: Sun Sep 29, 2013 9:15 am
by jonesthecurl
What does "Amercian" mean in this context?

Re: U.S. Geo-Ancestry

PostPosted: Sun Sep 29, 2013 9:24 am
by notyou2
No state with largest ethnicity Scottish????

Re: U.S. Geo-Ancestry

PostPosted: Sun Sep 29, 2013 9:33 am
by Serbia
The problem with this whole thing is that it's based on how individuals identify themselves. That's how you get a bunch of Southerners calling themselves "American".

Bollocks.

Re: U.S. Geo-Ancestry

PostPosted: Sun Sep 29, 2013 10:05 am
by Dukasaur
Serbia wrote:The problem with this whole thing is that it's based on how individuals identify themselves. That's how you get a bunch of Southerners calling themselves "American".

Bollocks.

It's legitimate. You don't see Englishmen saying "I'm a Saxon" or "I'm a Norman." After many generations have gone by, nobody really knows where all the roots of their family tree extend, and the distinctions are lost.

The southerners who just call themselves "American" are probably more accurate than the Wisconsin farm girls who call themselves "German" but don't know the difference between Wagner and Bach.

Re: U.S. Geo-Ancestry

PostPosted: Sun Sep 29, 2013 11:14 am
by oVo
thegreekdog wrote:That's a lot of Germans.

There's a lot of sparsely populated Germanic territory.

Re: U.S. Geo-Ancestry

PostPosted: Sun Sep 29, 2013 3:04 pm
by BigBallinStalin
Serbia wrote:The problem with this whole thing is that it's based on how individuals identify themselves. That's how you get a bunch of Southerners calling themselves "American".

Bollocks.


Image

Re: U.S. Geo-Ancestry

PostPosted: Sun Sep 29, 2013 4:28 pm
by jonesthecurl
Dukasaur wrote:
Serbia wrote:The problem with this whole thing is that it's based on how individuals identify themselves. That's how you get a bunch of Southerners calling themselves "American".

Bollocks.

It's legitimate. You don't see Englishmen saying "I'm a Saxon" or "I'm a Norman." After many generations have gone by, nobody really knows where all the roots of their family tree extend, and the distinctions are lost.

The southerners who just call themselves "American" are probably more accurate than the Wisconsin farm girls who call themselves "German" but don't know the difference between Wagner and Bach.


My point exactly. How Irish are the Irish, and how American are the Americans? And aren't Mexicans from America?

Re: U.S. Geo-Ancestry

PostPosted: Sun Sep 29, 2013 5:21 pm
by AAFitz
jonesthecurl wrote:What does "Amercian" mean in this context?


Just about exactly what the rest of the world thinks it means...

Re: U.S. Geo-Ancestry

PostPosted: Sun Sep 29, 2013 5:51 pm
by Lootifer
jonesthecurl wrote:What does "Amercian" mean in this context?

I think I heard somewhere that 5th Generation is usually the cut off... but not sure, depends on the poll/census questions I guess?

PostPosted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:26 am
by 2dimes
notyou2 wrote:No state with largest ethnicity Scottish????

We all went to Canada.

Re: U.S. Geo-Ancestry

PostPosted: Tue Oct 01, 2013 10:56 am
by PLAYER57832
Nobunaga wrote:No Poles? That's odd. If Poles had their own color, Cleveland would be solid (that color).

Yeah, Danes and a few others are omitted, too... something tells me they might all be combined into "German", partly because they tended to intermarry once they came here. Today, being German is fairly popular, but my grandfather was not promoted, at least partially because he was German. If you had asked folks 3 decades ago, they would have been more likely to pick out any other nationality than German. Today, those who are mixed (most Americans) are likely to just say "German"

Re: U.S. Geo-Ancestry

PostPosted: Tue Oct 01, 2013 10:56 am
by PLAYER57832
Phatscotty wrote:Pretty cool, always thinkin of you guys!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... today.html

Image

What is an "American" ?????

Re:

PostPosted: Tue Oct 01, 2013 10:58 am
by PLAYER57832
2dimes wrote:
notyou2 wrote:No state with largest ethnicity Scottish????

We all went to Canada.

LOL.. my high school history Teacher was born in Canada of Scottish parents who migrated to Canada and then to the US, because it was much easier to migrate from Scotland to Canada at that time, and then migrating from Canada to the US was not that hard.

So.. may be a tad bit of truth in that.

Re: U.S. Geo-Ancestry

PostPosted: Tue Oct 01, 2013 12:09 pm
by The Bison King
oVo wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:That's a lot of Germans.

There's a lot of sparsely populated Germanic territory.

Still a lot of Germans.

Re: U.S. Geo-Ancestry

PostPosted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 7:38 pm
by TA1LGUNN3R
The Bison King wrote:
oVo wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:That's a lot of Germans.

There's a lot of sparsely populated Germanic territory.

Still a lot of Germans.


And so the reticence of the U.S. to join in WWI and II becomes clear...

-TG