Page 1 of 6

Saul: true believer or spouter of lies?

PostPosted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 4:19 pm
by _sabotage_
Imagine J Edgar Hoover says he has an epiphany and then tries to join the Communist Party. Do you think he could rise through the ranks to become it's chief spokesman while simultaneously dismantling everything it stands for?

This is Saul. Persecutor of Christians and yet more of his writings are covered in the New Testament than the life Jesus. His contradictions to the teachings of Jesus are rife and more rules follow from his teachings than from those of Jesus.

His intolerance is quite clear and I know more people who won't go near Christianity due to his influence than any other reason, although they do not always realize that it is in fact the Church's adoption of his policies rather than Jesus's that deter them.

What are your thoughts on Saul?

Re: Saul: true believer or spouter of lies?

PostPosted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 4:20 pm
by Anarkistsdream
_sabotage_ wrote:Imagine J Edgar Hoover says he has an epiphany and then tries to join the Communist Party. Do you think he could rise through the ranks to become it's chief spokesman while simultaneously dismantling everything it stands for?

This is Saul. Persecutor of Christians and yet more of his writings are covered in the New Testament than the life Jesus. His contradictions to the teachings of Jesus are rife and more rules follow from his teachings than from those of Jesus.

His intolerance is quite clear and I know more people who won't go near Christianity due to his influence than any other reason, although they do not always realize that it is in fact the Church's adoption of his policies rather than Jesus's that deter them.

What are your thoughts on Saul?


I assumed this was another Breaking Bad thread...

Re: Saul: true believer or spouter of lies?

PostPosted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 4:28 pm
by DoomYoshi
I thought this was about sault ste marie.

Re: Saul: true believer or spouter of lies?

PostPosted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 4:30 pm
by BigBallinStalin
I'm not sure what Saul thinks about me, so it's hard to say.

PostPosted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 4:37 pm
by 2dimes
Anarkistsdream! Nice to see you pop in even though you never remember me.

Re:

PostPosted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 4:48 pm
by Anarkistsdream
2dimes wrote:Anarkistsdream! Nice to see you pop in even though you never remember me.


I know you, brother... Just try not to jump in the middle of conversations to say HI!

Now, Saul... Saul is OK with me jumping in to say HI!

As long as he gets his cut........



http://www.bettercallsaul.com/

Re: Saul: true believer or spouter of lies?

PostPosted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 4:51 pm
by betiko
I thought you couldn t spell soul.

PostPosted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 5:10 pm
by 2dimes
I look forward to this one. I will start by saying I do not belong to him or follow his teachings instead of those of the Christ.

1 Corinthians 1:11-13 King James Version (KJV)/ wrote:11 For it hath been declared unto me of you, my brethren, by them which are of the house of Chloe, that there are contentions among you.

12 Now this I say, that every one of you saith, I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ.

13 Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?


King James Version (KJV)
by Public Domain


Since I am not a Hebrew in the time of Christ or very soon after, I believe the gospel might possibly not have made it to my uncircumcised people without Saul's conversion.

Is it his writing that contradicts or some churches interpretation/distortion of them?

PostPosted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 5:11 pm
by 2dimes
Anarkistsdream wrote:
2dimes wrote:Anarkistsdream! Nice to see you pop in even though you never remember me.


I know you, brother... Just try not to jump in the middle of conversations to say HI!


But... ADD!

Re: Saul: true believer or spouter of lies?

PostPosted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 7:08 pm
by warmonger1981
Where was Jesus for 17 years? Tibet? India? Any books on the subject please pm me.

Re: Saul: true believer or spouter of lies?

PostPosted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 7:16 pm
by john9blue
saul = paul?

Re: Saul: true believer or spouter of lies?

PostPosted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 7:30 pm
by jonesthecurl
A good question sab. Do you think his writings are out of place in the prime text of Christianity, or do you think they belong there?

Re: Saul: true believer or spouter of lies?

PostPosted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 8:11 pm
by notyou2
john9blue wrote:saul = paul?


I believe that has been said before, or some believe they are the same.

PostPosted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 8:49 pm
by 2dimes
notyou2 wrote:
john9blue wrote:saul = paul?


I believe that has been said before, or some believe they are the same.

Saul was a righteous Pharisee who was in one of the finest persecutors of the early followers of Christ.

I don't know if he personally murdered them or was just the guy in charge, but many were hunted and killed by him or people acting on his orders.

God blinded him and gave him visions. One was to eat delicious Bacon, snake, hasenpfeffer, what have you. He protested because he had never broken the food laws. He was told to change his name to Paul and tell ~gasp~ Gentiles the good news.

He ended up writing letters to a bunch of churches that were partying pretty hard and somewhat confused about things such as Proselytism. Much of the content of those letters can speak to one seeking to follow Christ.

Some of it can be used to justify trying to make others act like certain churches demand.

So in a way Saul≠Paul. The point was he could not be the same person and experienced being born again.

Re:

PostPosted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 9:45 pm
by hahaha3hahaha
-deleted-

Re: Saul: true believer or spouter of lies?

PostPosted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 9:55 pm
by mrswdk
Image

Re: Saul: true believer or spouter of lies?

PostPosted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 9:58 pm
by _sabotage_
The gist of it: Saul wrote that man could only reach God through Jesus alone and not through obeying his laws.

Jesus stated on several occasions: He who hears the word of God and obeys is my brother and sister. Man shall not live on bread alone, but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God. I have not come to destroy the laws but to fulfill them.

If we take what Jesus actually said from the gospels in the New Testament and compare them with other works that were circulating at the time, they make a lot more sense than comparing the text incorporated in the Bible written by Paul/Saul. Paul was the one who said women could not preach, not Jesus and if we take the other works as credible, he made no distinction between men and women. Where did Paul's morbid fear of women come from? Certainly not from anything said or done by Jesus. Saul was an agent of the Pharisees who restricted priesthood to men, he was also a Roman. As the leading "Christian" scribe writing for the Romans, it was his ideas and the works that corresponded to them which later were accepted as gospel, and used to dispel unrest of what the Romans perceived to be a key problem of their day, the rising strength of women in civil affairs.

Throughout his writings we feel his interpretation and his decree to the people, not that of Jesus. The very book that we have and the actions of the Church to suppress other works and how the Church has behaved over the last couple thousand years is through his guidance and not that of Jesus. From the stance on homosexuality to the place of women in society to what Jesus said or meant. He was more or less the organizer, editor, purveyor and general magic ball reader for modern day Christianity.

Saul in short took spirituality, dismissed any rules that had been attached, removed spirituality and then asserted his own new set of rules.

Re: Saul: true believer or spouter of lies?

PostPosted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 10:09 pm
by BigBallinStalin
_sabotage_ wrote:The gist of it: Saul wrote that man could only reach God through Jesus alone and not through obeying his laws.

Saul was an agent of the Pharisees who restricted priesthood to men, he was also a Roman.



A Roman?!


Image

Re: Saul: true believer or spouter of lies?

PostPosted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 10:18 pm
by _sabotage_
www.catholic.com/quickquestions/why-did ... me-to-paul
The Hebrew name given him by his parents was Saul, but, because his father was a Roman citizen (and therefore Saul inherited Roman citizenship). For you, BBS.

As for Luke, it does not differ greatly in the teachings of Jesus, though it has several differences mainly regarding his childhood. It doesn't change his teachings, nor does acts or the following books add to it, though the discarded Gospels do. I find it interesting how they managed to resurface and the light they shed.

PostPosted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 10:27 pm
by 2dimes
hahaha3hahaha wrote:
2dimes wrote:God blinded him and gave him visions. One was to eat delicious Bacon, snake, hasenpfeffer, what have you. He protested because he had never broken the food laws.He was told to change his name to Paul and tell ~gasp~ Gentiles the good news.

You are confusing Paul for Peter. Peter had the vision of the unclean food, and if you keep on reading, you will realise that the interpretation of the dream was actually that the gospel was to be preached unto the gentiles ;)


I quit bibleing when I got married. Sorry.

Re: Saul: true believer or spouter of lies?

PostPosted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 10:28 pm
by rishaed
_sabotage_ wrote:The gist of it: Saul wrote that man could only reach God through Jesus alone and not through obeying his laws.

Jesus stated on several occasions: He who hears the word of God and obeys is my brother and sister. Man shall not live on bread alone, but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God. I have not come to destroy the laws but to fulfill them.

If we take what Jesus actually said from the gospels in the New Testament and compare them with other works that were circulating at the time, they make a lot more sense than comparing the text incorporated in the Bible written by Paul/Saul. Paul was the one who said women could not preach, not Jesus and if we take the other works as credible, he made no distinction between men and women. Where did Paul's morbid fear of women come from? Certainly not from anything said or done by Jesus. Saul was an agent of the Pharisees who restricted priesthood to men, he was also a Roman. As the leading "Christian" scribe writing for the Romans, it was his ideas and the works that corresponded to them which later were accepted as gospel, and used to dispel unrest of what the Romans perceived to be a key problem of their day, the rising strength of women in civil affairs.

Throughout his writings we feel his interpretation and his decree to the people, not that of Jesus. The very book that we have and the actions of the Church to suppress other works and how the Church has behaved over the last couple thousand years is through his guidance and not that of Jesus. From the stance on homosexuality to the place of women in society to what Jesus said or meant. He was more or less the organizer, editor, purveyor and general magic ball reader for modern day Christianity.

Saul in short took spirituality, dismissed any rules that had been attached, removed spirituality and then asserted his own new set of rules.

Jesus also said that: I am the Way the Truth and the Life; NO man cometh to the Father but by me. John 14:6
John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

John 3:17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.

John 3:18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
John 3:36 He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.

So how is the bolded contradictory?
Also You've apparently never read Rom. 5.
Romans 5:13 (For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law.

Romans 5:14 Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come.

Romans 5:15 But not as the offence, so also is the free gift. For if through the offence of one many be dead, much more the grace of God, and the gift by grace, which is by one man, Jesus Christ, hath abounded unto many.

Romans 5:16 And not as it was by one that sinned, so is the gift: for the judgment was by one to condemnation, but the free gift is of many offences unto justification.

Romans 5:17 For if by one man's offence death reigned by one; much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ.)

Romans 5:18 Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life.

Romans 5:19 For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous.

Romans 5:20 Moreover the law entered, that the offence might abound. But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound:

Romans 5:21 That as sin hath reigned unto death, even so might grace reign through righteousness unto eternal life by Jesus Christ our Lord.

Also if you want the laws view on homosexuality.... :
Leviticus 20:13 If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

I'm also laughing over this part in italics.....
Romans 16:1 I commend unto you Phebe our sister, which is a servant of the church which is at Cenchrea:
Also they were not forbidden in partaking of spiritual gifts:
1 Corinthians 11:5 But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven.
The only thing asked was to keep silence in the church. :roll:
Ephesians 5:22 Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord.

Ephesians 5:23 For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body.

Ephesians 5:24 Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing.

Ephesians 5:25 Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it;
Which I could further elaborate on but it would be slightly lengthy.

Re: Saul: true believer or spouter of lies?

PostPosted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 10:35 pm
by _sabotage_
“For truly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass the law until all is accomplished. Whoever then relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but he who does them and teaches them shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.” — Matthew 5:18-19

But now we have been released from the law, for we died to it and are no longer captive to its power. Now we can serve God, not in the old way of obeying the letter of the law, but in the new way of living in the Spirit. Romans 7: 6

Seems pretty clear.

Re: Saul: true believer or spouter of lies?

PostPosted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 10:43 pm
by mrswdk
I guess this is a bit of a SAUL topic for some Christians, eh?

...

hahahahahahahahahahahhahaha *coughcough* hahaha.. Ha.

PostPosted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 10:53 pm
by 2dimes
So you eat Kosher? That must have been tough in China.

Re: Saul: true believer or spouter of lies?

PostPosted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 11:00 pm
by _sabotage_
16 “Are you still so dull?” Jesus asked them. 17 “Don’t you see that whatever enters the mouth goes into the stomach and then out of the body? 18 But the things that come out of a person’s mouth come from the heart, and these defile them. 19 For out of the heart come evil thoughts—murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false testimony, slander. 20 These are what defile a person; but eating with unwashed hands does not defile them.”