Conquer Club

Posted: **Sat Jan 11, 2014 12:18 am**

Check for ID before you text those naked pics out of spite.

http://www.cbc.ca/player/ueberproxy.html?ID=2429427824

Posted: **Sat Jan 11, 2014 3:01 am**

Why do these girls always try to find someone else to blame for the fact that they took a naked picture of themselves and gave copies to someone else? The photo wouldn't be online if they hadn't taken it in the first place.

Posted: **Sat Jan 11, 2014 4:27 am**

Le sigh.

Posted: **Sat Jan 11, 2014 5:02 am**

I have a pic of Mrs. Wdk naked but I won't show it to you because she may be lying about her age.

Posted: **Sat Jan 11, 2014 7:52 am**

nietzsche wrote:I have a pic of Mrs. Wdk naked but I won't show it to you because she may be lying about her age.

There is already a picture of her in her sig, she opens her mouth like a pro. How old did she say she was?

Posted: **Sat Jan 11, 2014 9:37 am**

I told him I was 17, which he was pretty aggressively keen on.

Maybe he's worried that I'm actually in my 20s, because then my photo would be off topic in a thread about CP.

Posted: **Sat Jan 11, 2014 9:39 am**

you look 6 to me.

Posted: **Sat Jan 11, 2014 9:49 am**

Asians age well.

Posted: **Sat Jan 11, 2014 6:57 pm**

Any time I hear the words "cyber bully" or "homophobe" I get fucking livid and and desire to beat someone's face in.

I don't give a shit how old a person is, if they take a nude pic of themselves and aren't under distress and openly share it with someone, there shouldn't be any punishment for distribution.

Posted: **Sat Jan 11, 2014 8:10 pm**

Army of GOD wrote:I don't give a shit how old a person is, if they take a nude pic of themselves and aren't under distress and openly share it with someone, there shouldn't be any punishment for distribution.

Why? If I give you naked pictures of myself for your private enjoyment, what gives you the right to share them with saxi?

It's just like if I confess some embarrassing secret to you in confidence, and you decide to blab it in public. In that instance I should have the right, IMHO, to beat the shit out of you. Or whatever equivalent is legal and customary in your jurisdiction.

Posted: **Sat Jan 11, 2014 9:04 pm**

Dukasaur wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:I don't give a shit how old a person is, if they take a nude pic of themselves and aren't under distress and openly share it with someone, there shouldn't be any punishment for distribution.

Why? If I give you naked pictures of myself for your private enjoyment, what gives you the right to share them with saxi?

It's just like if I confess some embarrassing secret to you in confidence, and you decide to blab it in public. In that instance I should have the right, IMHO, to beat the shit out of you. Or whatever equivalent is legal and customary in your jurisdiction.

shoot with handgun I think is customary in US

Posted: **Sat Jan 11, 2014 10:40 pm**

Dukasaur wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:I don't give a shit how old a person is, if they take a nude pic of themselves and aren't under distress and openly share it with someone, there shouldn't be any punishment for distribution.

Why? If I give you naked pictures of myself for your private enjoyment, what gives you the right to share them with saxi?

WHAT!!!!!! You didn't want me to share them???

Posted: **Sat Jan 11, 2014 10:41 pm**

TeeGee wrote:
Dukasaur wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:I don't give a shit how old a person is, if they take a nude pic of themselves and aren't under distress and openly share it with someone, there shouldn't be any punishment for distribution.

Why? If I give you naked pictures of myself for your private enjoyment, what gives you the right to share them with saxi?

WHAT!!!!!! You didn't want me to share them???

PM please.

Bollocks.

Posted: **Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:49 pm**

Dukasaur wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:I don't give a shit how old a person is, if they take a nude pic of themselves and aren't under distress and openly share it with someone, there shouldn't be any punishment for distribution.

Why? If I give you naked pictures of myself for your private enjoyment, what gives you the right to share them with saxi?

It's just like if I confess some embarrassing secret to you in confidence, and you decide to blab it in public. In that instance I should have the right, IMHO, to beat the shit out of you. Or whatever equivalent is legal and customary in your jurisdiction.

Why not? By giving it to ANYONE you're consenting them to do whatever the f*ck they want with it. Just because I give you five dollars and tell you to buy yourself a shit ton of Ramen noodles doesn't mean that's what you have to do with the money. Once you hand it over it's no longer your property; I have the right to do whatever the hell I want with it. It's your fault for trusting me (in after parallels to rape-argument).

Posted: **Sun Jan 12, 2014 12:03 am**

A gentleman and a scholar wrote:It's your fault for trusting me

Posted: **Sun Jan 12, 2014 12:09 am**

mrswdk wrote:
A gentleman and a scholar wrote:It's your fault for trusting me

switch(mrswdk.isSarcastic()){
case false:
System.out.println("nice");
case true:
System.out.println("f*ck you and your little dog too");

Posted: **Sun Jan 12, 2014 1:02 am**

Ok, so aog is out of the usergroup project "post naked pics of yourself". No one can trust him anymore.

Posted: **Sun Jan 12, 2014 1:30 am**

Army of GOD wrote:
Dukasaur wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:I don't give a shit how old a person is, if they take a nude pic of themselves and aren't under distress and openly share it with someone, there shouldn't be any punishment for distribution.

Why? If I give you naked pictures of myself for your private enjoyment, what gives you the right to share them with saxi?

It's just like if I confess some embarrassing secret to you in confidence, and you decide to blab it in public. In that instance I should have the right, IMHO, to beat the shit out of you. Or whatever equivalent is legal and customary in your jurisdiction.

Why not? By giving it to ANYONE you're consenting them to do whatever the f*ck they want with it. Just because I give you five dollars and tell you to buy yourself a shit ton of Ramen noodles doesn't mean that's what you have to do with the money. Once you hand it over it's no longer your property; I have the right to do whatever the hell I want with it. It's your fault for trusting me (in after parallels to rape-argument).

I suppose a lot depends on what kind of discussion we had beforehand. If I just hand you five dollars unsolicited, then by all means it's yours free and clear. But if you begged me for five dollars and swore up and down that you were only buying Ramen noodles and nothing else, then the moral onus is on you.

Similarly, if I send you a naked pic of myself without any advance discussion, again I agree. What you do with it is your business. But if you beg me for a pic and promise that you won't do anything with it except study it yourself, then you are morally (and quite likely legally) on the hook when it shows up in saxi's email.

It seems to me from the news article that the girl in the pictures was the girlfriend of the boy, and reading between the lines I think it's pretty likely that he said, "come on baby, just let me take a picture of you giving me head, so that I'll have something to think about on the days that you can't come over," and being a typical gullible 14-year-old girl she agreed.

Posted: **Sun Jan 12, 2014 2:59 am**

Dukasaur wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:
Dukasaur wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:I don't give a shit how old a person is, if they take a nude pic of themselves and aren't under distress and openly share it with someone, there shouldn't be any punishment for distribution.

Why? If I give you naked pictures of myself for your private enjoyment, what gives you the right to share them with saxi?

It's just like if I confess some embarrassing secret to you in confidence, and you decide to blab it in public. In that instance I should have the right, IMHO, to beat the shit out of you. Or whatever equivalent is legal and customary in your jurisdiction.

Why not? By giving it to ANYONE you're consenting them to do whatever the f*ck they want with it. Just because I give you five dollars and tell you to buy yourself a shit ton of Ramen noodles doesn't mean that's what you have to do with the money. Once you hand it over it's no longer your property; I have the right to do whatever the hell I want with it. It's your fault for trusting me (in after parallels to rape-argument).

I suppose a lot depends on what kind of discussion we had beforehand. If I just hand you five dollars unsolicited, then by all means it's yours free and clear. But if you begged me for five dollars and swore up and down that you were only buying Ramen noodles and nothing else, then the moral onus is on you.

Moral onus my ass. Morality is subjective and, as can be seen by people that share these things, has no affect on people's decisions.

If I can convince you to give me 5 dollars for Ramen noodles, then that is your fault for trusting me. A lion will always be a lion and if you stick your head in a lion's mouth, hoping he won't bite, then you're a fucking moron.

Posted: **Sun Jan 12, 2014 3:08 am**

I'm just worried the guy might xeno.

I didn't watch the video, can someone tell me?

Posted: **Sun Jan 12, 2014 4:13 am**

Army of GOD wrote:
Dukasaur wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:
Dukasaur wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:I don't give a shit how old a person is, if they take a nude pic of themselves and aren't under distress and openly share it with someone, there shouldn't be any punishment for distribution.

Why? If I give you naked pictures of myself for your private enjoyment, what gives you the right to share them with saxi?

It's just like if I confess some embarrassing secret to you in confidence, and you decide to blab it in public. In that instance I should have the right, IMHO, to beat the shit out of you. Or whatever equivalent is legal and customary in your jurisdiction.

Why not? By giving it to ANYONE you're consenting them to do whatever the f*ck they want with it. Just because I give you five dollars and tell you to buy yourself a shit ton of Ramen noodles doesn't mean that's what you have to do with the money. Once you hand it over it's no longer your property; I have the right to do whatever the hell I want with it. It's your fault for trusting me (in after parallels to rape-argument).

I suppose a lot depends on what kind of discussion we had beforehand. If I just hand you five dollars unsolicited, then by all means it's yours free and clear. But if you begged me for five dollars and swore up and down that you were only buying Ramen noodles and nothing else, then the moral onus is on you.

Moral onus my ass. Morality is subjective and, as can be seen by people that share these things, has no affect on people's decisions.

If I can convince you to give me 5 dollars for Ramen noodles, then that is your fault for trusting me. A lion will always be a lion and if you stick your head in a lion's mouth, hoping he won't bite, then you're a fucking moron.

By that standard, operating a civilized society would be completely impossible.

"Honey, I think that neighbour of ours looks rather avaricious. I don't think we can trust him not to burglarize our house while we're away for the weekend."

"I supposed I'd better go shoot him before we leave, then."

At some point you have to assume that most people will behave morally most of the time, or you can't turn your back on anyone.

Posted: **Sun Jan 12, 2014 4:22 am**

Is giving your boyfriend a photo of yourself really the same as putting your head inside a lion's mouth?

I mean obviously it's the same if your boyfriend is AoG/Chris Brown, but what about normal couples?

Posted: **Sun Jan 12, 2014 4:25 am**

Posted: **Sun Jan 12, 2014 6:40 am**

Aog, what kind of douche are you?
So if your mum gives you 5 bucks to buy noodles and you go buy dildo batteries instead.. Your mum was an idiot to trust you in the first place?

Posted: **Sun Jan 12, 2014 9:52 pm**

Army of GOD wrote:
Dukasaur wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:I don't give a shit how old a person is, if they take a nude pic of themselves and aren't under distress and openly share it with someone, there shouldn't be any punishment for distribution.

Why? If I give you naked pictures of myself for your private enjoyment, what gives you the right to share them with saxi?

It's just like if I confess some embarrassing secret to you in confidence, and you decide to blab it in public. In that instance I should have the right, IMHO, to beat the shit out of you. Or whatever equivalent is legal and customary in your jurisdiction.

Why not? By giving it to ANYONE you're consenting them to do whatever the f*ck they want with it. Just because I give you five dollars and tell you to buy yourself a shit ton of Ramen noodles doesn't mean that's what you have to do with the money. Once you hand it over it's no longer your property; I have the right to do whatever the hell I want with it. It's your fault for trusting me (in after parallels to rape-argument).

1) What about if we have an agreement that you wont share them?

2) What if im stupid and dont realise its in my best interest to have an agreement so we dont have one, but we should?

3) What if im stupid and dont realise its in my best interest to have an agreement so we dont have one? note: you knew this before the exchange and it was the fundamental reason you asked for pics in the first place.

4) What if the stupid person in situation 3 is also a 16 year old girl?

Note this isnt relevant to the specific case. But just a general hypothetical.

Conquer Club

But she said she was 21

But she said she was 21

Re: But she said she was 21

Re: But she said she was 21

Re: But she said she was 21

Re: But she said she was 21

Re: But she said she was 21

Re: But she said she was 21

Re: But she said she was 21

Re: But she said she was 21

Re: But she said she was 21

Re: But she said she was 21

Re: But she said she was 21

Re: But she said she was 21

Re: But she said she was 21

Re: But she said she was 21

Re: But she said she was 21

Re: But she said she was 21

Re: But she said she was 21

Re: But she said she was 21

Re: But she said she was 21

Re: But she said she was 21

Re: But she said she was 21

Re: But she said she was 21

Re: But she said she was 21

Re: But she said she was 21