Although I think it's Mets fault as well, and a little bit of saxi's fault too.
Re: Without BigBallinStalin
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 7:55 am
by thegreekdog
After he didn't post for a 24 hour period I said to myself "He must be banned." After 48 hours, I was like, "Woah, how long was he banned for" and then I went to his wall. Apparently he's found better places to distribute his patricular brand of libertarian (or he's banging some hot chick).
Re: Without BigBallinStalin
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 10:35 am
by AndyDufresne
What am I going to do with this?
--Andy
Re: Without BigBallinStalin
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 10:53 am
by Dukasaur
I find it very suspicious that his last post was December 31st. I think the cuckoo bastard went and made some kind of New Year's Resolution to break his CC addiction. Remember that he tried to do something similar last year. (Ahem!) This year I think instead of a partial withdrawal he just went cold turkey.
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 12:19 pm
by 2dimes
He's at the Tilted Kilt.
Re: Without BigBallinStalin
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 12:25 pm
by Symmetry
He's off the grid? A fake economist with a psychopathic desire for my death? How could you let this happen?
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 12:26 pm
by 2dimes
Quite crying and have some cake.
Re:
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 12:29 pm
by Symmetry
2dimes wrote:Quite crying and have some cake.
Can I be sarcastic about your inability to spell "quit" instead?
Re: Re:
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 2:08 pm
by betiko
Symmetry wrote:
2dimes wrote:Quite crying and have some cake.
Can I be sarcastic about your inability to spell "quit" instead?
No, he meant quite cryingly.
Re: Re:
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 2:13 pm
by Symmetry
betiko wrote:
Symmetry wrote:
2dimes wrote:Quite crying and have some cake.
Can I be sarcastic about your inability to spell "quit" instead?
No, he meant quite cryingly.
Dammit, I really like being sarcastic.
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 3:24 pm
by 2dimes
Kwit?
Re:
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 3:29 pm
by Symmetry
2dimes wrote:Kwit?
I preferred Betiko and "cryringly".
Re: Without BigBallinStalin
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 3:34 pm
by Lootifer
RIP good sir.
Re: Without BigBallinStalin
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 3:34 pm
by ManBungalow
Quick, post unhelpful economics graphs with no context!
He won't be able to resist commenting, and will subsequently remove his clothes.
Re: Without BigBallinStalin
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 3:35 pm
by Lootifer
Oh and he had an identical dissapearance last year (as did I actually). Though last time it was a bet.
He'll be back im sure.
Re: Without BigBallinStalin
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 3:41 pm
by AndyDufresne
ManBungalow wrote:Quick, post unhelpful economics graphs with no context!
He won't be able to resist commenting, and will subsequently remove his clothes.
--Andy
Re: Without BigBallinStalin
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 3:44 pm
by betiko
AndyDufresne wrote:
ManBungalow wrote:Quick, post unhelpful economics graphs with no context!
He won't be able to resist commenting, and will subsequently remove his clothes.
--Andy
This proves that without taxes you can t run a country.
Re: Without BigBallinStalin
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 4:07 pm
by saxitoxin
Lootifer wrote:Oh and he had an identical dissapearance last year (as did I actually).
romantic getaway?
Re: Without BigBallinStalin
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 4:14 pm
by AndyDufresne
saxitoxin wrote:
Lootifer wrote:Oh and he had an identical dissapearance last year (as did I actually).
romantic getaway?
Here is a snapshot I found from last year, rifling through Lootifer's belongings.
--Andy
Re: Without BigBallinStalin
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 4:32 pm
by saxitoxin
AndyDufresne wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:
Lootifer wrote:Oh and he had an identical dissapearance last year (as did I actually).
romantic getaway?
Here is a snapshot I found from last year, rifling through Lootifer's belongings.
damn Lootifer, your legs do not give up - someone throw some cold water on me
Re: Without BigBallinStalin
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 5:35 pm
by ManBungalow
betiko wrote:
AndyDufresne wrote:
ManBungalow wrote:Quick, post unhelpful economics graphs with no context!
He won't be able to resist commenting, and will subsequently remove his clothes.
--Andy
This proves that without taxes you can t run a country.
This graph should prove otherwise.
Re: Without BigBallinStalin
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 7:50 pm
by Dukasaur
ManBungalow wrote:
betiko wrote:
AndyDufresne wrote:
ManBungalow wrote:Quick, post unhelpful economics graphs with no context!
He won't be able to resist commenting, and will subsequently remove his clothes.
--Andy
This proves that without taxes you can t run a country.
This graph should prove otherwise.
Re: Without BigBallinStalin
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 9:33 pm
by betiko
Dukasaur wrote:
ManBungalow wrote:
betiko wrote:
AndyDufresne wrote:
ManBungalow wrote:Quick, post unhelpful economics graphs with no context!
He won't be able to resist commenting, and will subsequently remove his clothes.
--Andy
This proves that without taxes you can t run a country.
This graph should prove otherwise.
what have you guys smoken? The invisible hand!!! the invisible hand Adam Smith describes in An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations prves the opposite. but this graph doesn't: