Pornstar's LEGO Blowjob Competition

by **AndyDufresne** on Thu Jan 30, 2014 10:07 am

It was almost shut down by TGD or the like (LEGO lawyers objected to her using LEGOs this way), but you can still enter using play building blocks:

http://kotaku.com/the-lego-blowjob-comp ... 1511878856

--Andy

by **BigBallinStalin** on Thu Jan 30, 2014 12:40 pm

Another deadweight loss due to the prohibition on market exchanges for sex.

by **Dukasaur** on Thu Jan 30, 2014 12:56 pm

BigBallinStalin wrote:Another deadweight loss due to the prohibition on market exchanges for sex.

I think in this case it's more of a loss due to rent-seeking on arrangements of letters to form names.

by **betiko** on Thu Jan 30, 2014 1:16 pm

This is sad. I would ve been thrilled to hear from my parents offering me a lego when I was a kid this:
"If you become good enough at it, when you grow up you ll get blows for legos!"

by **JBlombier** on Thu Jan 30, 2014 2:30 pm

Let's make a BJ appreciation thread about this.

by **Gillipig** on Thu Jan 30, 2014 4:13 pm

I will enter her house in about five seconds, I'll make sure to let you know how it went afterwards, I hope she likes the lego I built her, if not....well I'm not leaving witout that blowjob!

by **betiko** on Thu Jan 30, 2014 7:26 pm

Gillipig wrote:I will enter her house in about five seconds, I'll make sure to let you know how it went afterwards, I hope she likes the lego I built her, if not....well I'm not leaving witout that blowjob!

Pictures!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

we can't wait to hear about the cool lego you built!

by **Gillipig** on Fri Jan 31, 2014 3:31 am

I'm in jail now, plan backfired, can't say anything more due to legal issues.

by **BigBallinStalin** on Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:12 am

Dukasaur wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:Another deadweight loss due to the prohibition on market exchanges for sex.

I think in this case it's more of a loss due to rent-seeking on arrangements of letters to form names.

I'm not 100% sure to be honest. It seems the lawyers reacted because there are repercussions for offering sex in market exchanges (BJ for Legos). If trading sex was 100% legit, then Twitter might have stomped the competition so that they aren't mistaken as a sex trade website.

Why do you think it's rent-seeking?

by **betiko** on Fri Jan 31, 2014 12:26 pm

BigBallinStalin wrote:
Dukasaur wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:Another deadweight loss due to the prohibition on market exchanges for sex.

I think in this case it's more of a loss due to rent-seeking on arrangements of letters to form names.

I'm not 100% sure to be honest. It seems the lawyers reacted because there are repercussions for offering sex in market exchanges (BJ for Legos). If trading sex was 100% legit, then Twitter might have stomped the competition so that they aren't mistaken as a sex trade website.

Why do you think it's rent-seeking?

how could she rephraze it to make it legit? If she says "I will fall in love for a night with the man that brings me the best lego sculpture. And I'm desperate for giving a bj". Would that be ethically correct? i' can't see why it would not.

Also, if a wife/girlfriend tells you she will blow you for 10 nights straight if you buy her that cool dress. Is it legal or should you report it to authorities?

friends with benefits. Is it legal to trade sex for sex, or is it evil^2?

by **Dukasaur** on Fri Jan 31, 2014 12:43 pm

BigBallinStalin wrote:
Dukasaur wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:Another deadweight loss due to the prohibition on market exchanges for sex.

I think in this case it's more of a loss due to rent-seeking on arrangements of letters to form names.

I'm not 100% sure to be honest. It seems the lawyers reacted because there are repercussions for offering sex in market exchanges (BJ for Legos). If trading sex was 100% legit, then Twitter might have stomped the competition so that they aren't mistaken as a sex trade website.

Why do you think it's rent-seeking?

They're restricting freedom of expression because it might impact their revenues.

If I buy a box of legos, I should be able to do what I want with it, including secure the services of a prostitute. But their marketing people look at it, they see that there might be an increase in sales to people like me, but there will be a decline in sales in Pawfucket, Massachusetts because the Puritans will get their petticoats in a twist and refuse to buy legos for their grandchildren.

After a quick calculation, they realize that there's a hell of a lot more moralistic jam-tarts in the world than there are hookers who accept lego payments, and sales might go down as much as 3%. That's enough reason for them to go to court to nip this new social phenomenon in the bud. Since they can't directly control what I do with my lego, they will (through the courts) engage in censoring public discourse between me and the hookers.

by **AndyDufresne** on Fri Jan 31, 2014 12:43 pm

betiko wrote:how could she rephraze it to make it legit? If she says "I will fall in love for a night with the man that brings me the best lego sculpture. And I'm desperate for giving a bj". Would that be ethically correct? i' can't see why it would not.

She used this rephrase to get around LEGO lawyers:

Also, you can build with some LEGOs in Chrome: http://www.buildwithchrome.com/

--Andy

by **BigBallinStalin** on Fri Jan 31, 2014 5:57 pm

betiko wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:
Dukasaur wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:Another deadweight loss due to the prohibition on market exchanges for sex.

I think in this case it's more of a loss due to rent-seeking on arrangements of letters to form names.

I'm not 100% sure to be honest. It seems the lawyers reacted because there are repercussions for offering sex in market exchanges (BJ for Legos). If trading sex was 100% legit, then Twitter might have stomped the competition so that they aren't mistaken as a sex trade website.

Why do you think it's rent-seeking?

how could she rephraze it to make it legit? If she says "I will fall in love for a night with the man that brings me the best lego sculpture. And I'm desperate for giving a bj". Would that be ethically correct? i' can't see why it would not.

Also, if a wife/girlfriend tells you she will blow you for 10 nights straight if you buy her that cool dress. Is it legal or should you report it to authorities?

friends with benefits. Is it legal to trade sex for sex, or is it evil^2?

I'm not sure, but its legitimacy isn't related to ethics. If Twitter doesn't want to be known as a sex exchange, then it'll be difficult to even 'beat around the bush'.

RE: your last two questions, exactly, but if the government passed laws forbidding those acts, then not only would many people get pissed, but the lawmakers, bureaucrats, and enforcers would also be deprived of the benefits.

by **saxitoxin** on Fri Jan 31, 2014 7:15 pm

I went to the trouble of clicking open a thread with the word "blowjob competition" in the title and this is the shit I get?

Wake me up when it gets interesting.

by **AndyDufresne** on Fri Jan 31, 2014 8:43 pm

saxitoxin wrote:I went to the trouble of clicking open a thread with the word "blowjob competition" in the title and this is the shit I get?

Wake me up when it gets interesting.

You're just angry because you didn't think of starting the same competition here on CC?!?!

--Andy