Moderator: Community Team
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
Metsfanmax wrote:I support Herman Cain.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
saxitoxin wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:I support Herman Cain.
reported for trolling
saxitoxin wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:I support Herman Cain.
reported for trolling
Metsfanmax wrote:saxitoxin wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:I support Herman Cain.
reported for trolling
I'm quite serious. In general, I support the Republican presidential candidate that is most likely to lose.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
saxitoxin wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:saxitoxin wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:I support Herman Cain.
reported for trolling
I'm quite serious. In general, I support the Republican presidential candidate that is most likely to lose.
no you're a loser
thegreekdog wrote:I went with Huntsman and Paul, but I admittedly do not know much about the other candidates from a policy perspective. Have any or all of them announced they are running?
saxitoxin wrote:No one asked me, but I'm telling you anyway.
If I were voting, and if the election were held tomorrow - and if I had no choice except between the GOP and the Democratic Party - my first choice would be Brian Schweitzer. If the Democrats give the nomination to Elvira, as they probably will, then my second choice would be (with great apprehension) Jon Huntsman (is he running again?), though far too Atlanticist [and Mormon] in outlook for my taste. If neither Schweitzer nor Huntsman were options, I would probably abstain from the presidential line on the ballot.
I didn't recognize a lot of the names on Scott's list (e.g. Ben Carson) and had to Wikipedia them.
Who are your FAVs, Scott?
thegreekdog wrote:I went with Huntsman and Paul, but I admittedly do not know much about the other candidates from a policy perspective. Have any or all of them announced they are running?
/ wrote:Susana Martinez is a awesome, but that makes me conflicted, since if she's president that means we might get another Bill Richardson for governor...
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
Phatscotty wrote:Ben Carson is towards the top of my list... he has the balls to confront Obama
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
Serbia wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Ben Carson is towards the top of my list... he has the balls to confront Obama
Obama won't be running, so why should that matter?
I went with Jeb (can never have too many Bushes!), Rubio and Jindal (minority ftw?) as my picks. Other than that, way too soon for me to be making selections.
Bollocks.
Serbia wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Ben Carson is towards the top of my list... he has the balls to confront Obama
Obama won't be running, so why should that matter?
saxitoxin wrote:/ wrote:Susana Martinez is a awesome, but that makes me conflicted, since if she's president that means we might get another Bill Richardson for governor...
I'll czech her out! (Does she know the truth about Dulce Base?)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users