Page 1 of 2

Democratic Presidential Nominees

PostPosted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 7:29 pm
by saxitoxin
(This is a companion thread to Scott's "GOP Presidential Nominees" thread.)

After an eight-year interruption, the Democrats are preparing to return to fielding electoral slates of Aryans. Which WASP do you support for Queen of the Hive?

Re: Democratic Presidential Nominees

PostPosted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 8:49 pm
by BigBallinStalin
HICKENLOOPER.

Ya can't go wrong with a name like that.

Re: Democratic Presidential Nominees

PostPosted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 10:10 pm
by AndyDufresne
Hickenlooper's campaign slogan would be an homage to earlier rhyming campaign slogans of years and years past, methinks.

'Hickenlooper -- Pick'em, he's super-duper.'


--Andy

Re: Democratic Presidential Nominees

PostPosted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 10:12 pm
by Dukasaur
Jimmy Hoffa!

Re: Democratic Presidential Nominees

PostPosted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 10:37 pm
by thegreekdog
It will be interesting to see Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden interact/debate.

Re: Democratic Presidential Nominees

PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 12:37 am
by Phatscotty
I think Benghazi is going to be a huge problem for Hil-dawg. Other than that, the plastic surgery and lyposuction are coming soon. The lack of ethnic diversity on this list makes it look like Sheriff Joe Arpaio should be added to it.

Image

Re: Democratic Presidential Nominees

PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 12:47 am
by AndyDufresne
Phatscotty wrote:I think Benghazi is going to be a huge problem for Hil-dawg. Other than that, the plastic surgery and lyposuction are coming soon. The lack of ethnic diversity on this list makes it look like Sheriff Joe Arpaio should be added to it.

Image


I am not sure this post contains serious enough discussion for this topic, re: Hil-dawg, plastic surgery and liposuction, et al.


--Andy

Re: Democratic Presidential Nominees

PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 12:57 am
by Phatscotty
AndyDufresne wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:I think Benghazi is going to be a huge problem for Hil-dawg. Other than that, the plastic surgery and lyposuction are coming soon. The lack of ethnic diversity on this list makes it look like Sheriff Joe Arpaio should be added to it.

Image


I am not sure this post contains serious enough discussion for this topic, re: Hil-dawg, plastic surgery and liposuction, et al.


--Andy


It does

Re: Democratic Presidential Nominees

PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 12:59 am
by AndyDufresne
I'm appointing an independent commission of AOG, Serbia, and betiko to investigate the matters further.


--Andy

Re: Democratic Presidential Nominees

PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 1:07 am
by Serbia
AndyDufresne wrote:I'm appointing an independent commission of AOG, Serbia, and betiko to investigate the matters further.


--Andy


For clarification; which matters am I meant to investigate further? PS's post on Hilary, and the merits of said post? Hilary in general? Or the potential Democratic field? Please let me know ASAP so I might get on with my investigation.

Bollocks.

Re: Democratic Presidential Nominees

PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 1:11 am
by Dukasaur
Serbia wrote:
AndyDufresne wrote:I'm appointing an independent commission of AOG, Serbia, and betiko to investigate the matters further.


--Andy


For clarification; which matters am I meant to investigate further? PS's post on Hilary, and the merits of said post? Hilary in general? Or the potential Democratic field? Please let me know ASAP so I might get on with my investigation.

Bollocks.

Investigate the degree to which Hilary's liposuction influences fiscal policy.

Re: Democratic Presidential Nominees

PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 1:13 am
by Phatscotty
Dukasaur wrote:
Serbia wrote:
AndyDufresne wrote:I'm appointing an independent commission of AOG, Serbia, and betiko to investigate the matters further.


--Andy


For clarification; which matters am I meant to investigate further? PS's post on Hilary, and the merits of said post? Hilary in general? Or the potential Democratic field? Please let me know ASAP so I might get on with my investigation.

Bollocks.

Investigate the degree to which Hilary's liposuction influences fiscal policy.


Lot of liquified pork can be drained there

Re: Democratic Presidential Nominees

PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 1:38 am
by Dukasaur
Phatscotty wrote:
Dukasaur wrote:
Serbia wrote:
AndyDufresne wrote:I'm appointing an independent commission of AOG, Serbia, and betiko to investigate the matters further.


--Andy


For clarification; which matters am I meant to investigate further? PS's post on Hilary, and the merits of said post? Hilary in general? Or the potential Democratic field? Please let me know ASAP so I might get on with my investigation.

Bollocks.

Investigate the degree to which Hilary's liposuction influences fiscal policy.


Lot of liquified pork can be drained there

:lol:

Do you mean to say that pork-barrel politics is still practised in the 21st century?
:o :o :o

Re: Democratic Presidential Nominees

PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 1:50 am
by Phatscotty
Until I learn more about the bottom 3, I have to go with Howard Dean. It would be fun to watch Bill Clinton as the first husband if they win, but I really don't think Democrats are going to hold the white house for 12-16 years. It's time for change again, and it probably will be a GOP president regardless of who gets the nomination. America is like that with the presidency based on the right/wrong trajectory poll alone. As of today 29% of Americans think we are heading in the right direction, 63% think we are heading in the wrong direction. Plus I bet Obama as a lame duck with a Tea Party majority in Congress is going to take trashing the place on the way out to a whole new level.

Re: Democratic Presidential Nominees

PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 11:00 am
by thegreekdog
Phatscotty wrote:Until I learn more about the bottom 3, I have to go with Howard Dean. It would be fun to watch Bill Clinton as the first husband if they win, but I really don't think Democrats are going to hold the white house for 12-16 years. It's time for change again, and it probably will be a GOP president regardless of who gets the nomination. America is like that with the presidency based on the right/wrong trajectory poll alone. As of today 29% of Americans think we are heading in the right direction, 63% think we are heading in the wrong direction. Plus I bet Obama as a lame duck with a Tea Party majority in Congress is going to take trashing the place on the way out to a whole new level.


At least Howard Dean is actually liberal, unlike Mrs. Clinton.

Re: Democratic Presidential Nominees

PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 11:53 am
by AndyDufresne
Phatscotty wrote: Plus I bet Obama as a lame duck with a Tea Party majority in Congress is going to take trashing the place on the way out to a whole new level.

Tea Party is already ahead of him and trashing the place. They started in 2010 I think.

Dukasaur wrote:
Serbia wrote:
AndyDufresne wrote:I'm appointing an independent commission of AOG, Serbia, and betiko to investigate the matters further.


--Andy


For clarification; which matters am I meant to investigate further? PS's post on Hilary, and the merits of said post? Hilary in general? Or the potential Democratic field? Please let me know ASAP so I might get on with my investigation.

Bollocks.

Investigate the degree to which Hilary's liposuction influences fiscal policy.


I've bolded the two items for investigation.


--Andy

Re: Democratic Presidential Nominees

PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 12:47 pm
by Serbia
AndyDufresne wrote:
Phatscotty wrote: Plus I bet Obama as a lame duck with a Tea Party majority in Congress is going to take trashing the place on the way out to a whole new level.

Tea Party is already ahead of him and trashing the place. They started in 2010 I think.

Dukasaur wrote:
Serbia wrote:
AndyDufresne wrote:I'm appointing an independent commission of AOG, Serbia, and betiko to investigate the matters further.


--Andy


For clarification; which matters am I meant to investigate further? PS's post on Hilary, and the merits of said post? Hilary in general? Or the potential Democratic field? Please let me know ASAP so I might get on with my investigation.

Bollocks.

Investigate the degree to which Hilary's liposuction influences fiscal policy.


I've bolded the two items for investigation.


--Andy


On it. I'll have my findings by next Sunday.*

*All deadlines are subject to be missed by more than a year at my sole discretion. Any complaints about missed deadlines will result in unintended consequences that I may not be held responsible for and may result in additional fees.

Re: Democratic Presidential Nominees

PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 1:09 pm
by notyou2
NEXT SUNDAY!!!! That's a life time in politics. We need this done sooner.

Re: Democratic Presidential Nominees

PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 1:42 pm
by Phatscotty
...and......another great thread infiltrated by the parasites of nothingness. (sweet band name)

I'll check back again after you guys fill the next 2 pages with junk. Way to be the problem you warn about. Brilliant and hypocritical in the same stroke.

Re: Democratic Presidential Nominees

PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 1:48 pm
by Serbia
notyou2 wrote:NEXT SUNDAY!!!! That's a life time in politics. We need this done sooner.


Then you'll have to cough up another 10 G's.

Bollocks.

Re: Democratic Presidential Nominees

PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 2:14 pm
by BigBallinStalin
Phatscotty wrote:...and......another great thread infiltrated by the parasites of nothingness. (sweet band name)

I'll check back again after you guys fill the next 2 pages with junk. Way to be the problem you warn about. Brilliant and hypocritical in the same stroke.


The OT community is currently addressing your concerns, so please be patient. Investigations do not take <1 hour to complete. Data must be assessed; facts must be ascertained; and conclusions must be drawn--but not in that exact order.

Re: Democratic Presidential Nominees

PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 2:18 pm
by AndyDufresne
BigBallinStalin wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:...and......another great thread infiltrated by the parasites of nothingness. (sweet band name)

I'll check back again after you guys fill the next 2 pages with junk. Way to be the problem you warn about. Brilliant and hypocritical in the same stroke.


The OT community is currently addressing your concerns, so please be patient. Investigations do not take <1 hour to complete. Data must be assessed; facts must be ascertained; and conclusions must be drawn--but not in that exact order.


Subject: Separate Forum for Intellectual Topics/Discussion POLL

AndyDufresne wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:If the following points against the OT division cannot be bested, then OP's suggestion should be rejected:


AndyDufresne wrote:PS and universalchiro -- Go examine the last 5 pages of the Off Topics forum. Can you make a list of which topics would be where? I am curious to see your division, with real concrete examples from the most recent Off Topics posts.


--Andy



And:
viewtopic.php?f=704&t=184580&hilit=split&start=30#p4047230

I didn't bother formatting or sorting this file, since that should be the job of those proffering the suggestion, but here is some raw data you can work with, in .XLS format.

http://www.filedropper.com/last5pagesofofftopicstopics



--Andy

Re: Democratic Presidential Nominees

PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 2:31 pm
by BigBallinStalin
AndyDufresne wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:...and......another great thread infiltrated by the parasites of nothingness. (sweet band name)

I'll check back again after you guys fill the next 2 pages with junk. Way to be the problem you warn about. Brilliant and hypocritical in the same stroke.


The OT community is currently addressing your concerns, so please be patient. Investigations do not take <1 hour to complete. Data must be assessed; facts must be ascertained; and conclusions must be drawn--but not in that exact order.


Subject: Separate Forum for Intellectual Topics/Discussion POLL

AndyDufresne wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:If the following points against the OT division cannot be bested, then OP's suggestion should be rejected:


AndyDufresne wrote:PS and universalchiro -- Go examine the last 5 pages of the Off Topics forum. Can you make a list of which topics would be where? I am curious to see your division, with real concrete examples from the most recent Off Topics posts.


--Andy



And:
viewtopic.php?f=704&t=184580&hilit=split&start=30#p4047230

I didn't bother formatting or sorting this file, since that should be the job of those proffering the suggestion, but here is some raw data you can work with, in .XLS format.

http://www.filedropper.com/last5pagesofofftopicstopics



--Andy


What a daunting task! I nominate john9blue to handle this pressing matter.

Re: Democratic Presidential Nominees

PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 3:50 pm
by thegreekdog
Phatscotty wrote:...and......another great thread infiltrated by the parasites of nothingness. (sweet band name)

I'll check back again after you guys fill the next 2 pages with junk. Way to be the problem you warn about. Brilliant and hypocritical in the same stroke.


Yes, because you've added a ton of useful, informative, and relevant information to this thread. Incidentally, in case you missed it with the thousands of derailing posts in between (and by "thousands" I mean "zero"), I did reply to your one somewhat serious post in this thread.