Page 1 of 1

Wrestlemania

PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 1:18 pm
by DoomYoshi
Hmmm... I hear lots of bitching about the matchups this year. I feel so seperated from the Universe... I am looking forward to Taker and Lesnar way too much. The 30 man BR will be great, lots of stars can get a WM paycheque. JC and the Wyatts feels like a very phony feud, but no worse than anything Cena does. Bryan walking away with the titles does seem predictable, but I can see some weird shit happening where they split the titles again. It will be a fun night, and since it is the cheapest WM in the history of ever, I don't mind if it isn't JCvsTheRock caliber.

show

Re: Wrestlemania

PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 3:15 pm
by betiko
I never understood wrestling. What makes the leagues decide who gets to win? Do they build scenarios for entire seasons?

Re: Wrestlemania

PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 9:23 pm
by Jmac1026
betiko wrote:I never understood wrestling. What makes the leagues decide who gets to win? Do they build scenarios for entire seasons?

Its basically a soap opera with big sweaty men in tight clothing. And they pound each other.

Re: Wrestlemania

PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 9:47 pm
by betiko
Jmac1026 wrote:
betiko wrote:I never understood wrestling. What makes the leagues decide who gets to win? Do they build scenarios for entire seasons?

Its basically a soap opera with big sweaty men in tight clothing. And they pound each other.


it doesn't answer my question. how do scenarists work? on a week by week basis? aren't the actors somehow able to raise more or less their popularity compared to the scenario expectations, which leads the scenarists to change the scripts?

basically if you enter the WWF, how can you become a star without relying 100% on scenarists to be nice with your character?

Re: Wrestlemania

PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 11:25 pm
by DoomYoshi
betiko wrote:
Jmac1026 wrote:
betiko wrote:I never understood wrestling. What makes the leagues decide who gets to win? Do they build scenarios for entire seasons?

Its basically a soap opera with big sweaty men in tight clothing. And they pound each other.


it doesn't answer my question. how do scenarists work? on a week by week basis? aren't the actors somehow able to raise more or less their popularity compared to the scenario expectations, which leads the scenarists to change the scripts?

basically if you enter the WWF, how can you become a star without relying 100% on scenarists to be nice with your character?


Since the mid-90s, wrestlers have had to design their own characters more or less. WWE still decides on the branding of the character (things like shirts, videos, songs) but it is up to the person to sell their character to the audience. If the character gets an audience (i.e. people in the crowd with signs, internet followers) and has a good look, they can be given a push into championship stories.

Storyboards are usually written a few months in advance. If a wrestler quits or is injured, they are changed on the fly. The biggest problem with wrestling is continuity errors though. Rules from "the rulebook" come and go, characters who easily defeat monsters in a few weeks can't beat wimps, characters are totally remade etc.

Re: Wrestlemania

PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 2:50 am
by DoomYoshi
There is a brand new match just announced.

Marc Grossman is enacting his rematch clause against James F. Dobbins for the title of Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Re: Wrestlemania

PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 6:11 am
by betiko
What happens if an actor doesn t follow the storyline and challenges publicly someone he is not supposed to challenge?

Re: Wrestlemania

PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 6:18 am
by Symmetry
betiko wrote:What happens if an actor doesn t follow the storyline and challenges publicly someone he is not supposed to challenge?


Their harness breaks during an entrance and they plunge to their death in front of a crowd of bellowing red-necks.

Re: Wrestlemania

PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 6:18 am
by Symmetry
Too soon?

Re: Wrestlemania

PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2014 8:05 am
by thegreekdog
betiko wrote:What happens if an actor doesn t follow the storyline and challenges publicly someone he is not supposed to challenge?


Usually he/she gets fired (not publicly).
Once, he lost a championship in sketchy fashion and was fired (The Montreal Screwjob).
Once, said wrestler's brother (also a wrestler) falls from a harness and dies from a broken neck.

Re: Wrestlemania

PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2014 8:14 am
by thegreekdog
DoomYoshi wrote:Hmmm... I hear lots of bitching about the matchups this year. I feel so seperated from the Universe... I am looking forward to Taker and Lesnar way too much. The 30 man BR will be great, lots of stars can get a WM paycheque. JC and the Wyatts feels like a very phony feud, but no worse than anything Cena does. Bryan walking away with the titles does seem predictable, but I can see some weird shit happening where they split the titles again. It will be a fun night, and since it is the cheapest WM in the history of ever, I don't mind if it isn't JCvsTheRock caliber.


The Wyatts (specifically Bray Wyatt) are among the best to come along in a while (in my opinion).

Re: Wrestlemania

PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2014 11:16 am
by crispybits
Is it this weekend?

Re: Wrestlemania

PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2014 1:13 pm
by DoomYoshi
Next weekned.

Re: Wrestlemania

PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2014 1:20 pm
by thegreekdog
Symmetry wrote:Too soon?


Well, it happened in Kansas City, Missouri so I'm not sure how many rednecks were there. Maybe that's why the silence in respect to your post.

Re: Wrestlemania

PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2014 1:41 pm
by DoomYoshi
thegreekdog wrote:
DoomYoshi wrote:Hmmm... I hear lots of bitching about the matchups this year. I feel so seperated from the Universe... I am looking forward to Taker and Lesnar way too much. The 30 man BR will be great, lots of stars can get a WM paycheque. JC and the Wyatts feels like a very phony feud, but no worse than anything Cena does. Bryan walking away with the titles does seem predictable, but I can see some weird shit happening where they split the titles again. It will be a fun night, and since it is the cheapest WM in the history of ever, I don't mind if it isn't JCvsTheRock caliber.


The Wyatts (specifically Bray Wyatt) are among the best to come along in a while (in my opinion).


Great character development. Interesting to watch. However, the "creepy and mysterious" thing has been overplayed to the point where the writing team just cops out and doesn't give them a reason for anything. So, the Bryan feud because... he had a beard? The Cena feud because... it will sell tickets? It's not like wrestling feuds are hard to write. They mostly use the same formulas from the 60s.

Re: Wrestlemania

PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2014 3:58 pm
by thegreekdog
DoomYoshi wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:
DoomYoshi wrote:Hmmm... I hear lots of bitching about the matchups this year. I feel so seperated from the Universe... I am looking forward to Taker and Lesnar way too much. The 30 man BR will be great, lots of stars can get a WM paycheque. JC and the Wyatts feels like a very phony feud, but no worse than anything Cena does. Bryan walking away with the titles does seem predictable, but I can see some weird shit happening where they split the titles again. It will be a fun night, and since it is the cheapest WM in the history of ever, I don't mind if it isn't JCvsTheRock caliber.


The Wyatts (specifically Bray Wyatt) are among the best to come along in a while (in my opinion).


Great character development. Interesting to watch. However, the "creepy and mysterious" thing has been overplayed to the point where the writing team just cops out and doesn't give them a reason for anything. So, the Bryan feud because... he had a beard? The Cena feud because... it will sell tickets? It's not like wrestling feuds are hard to write. They mostly use the same formulas from the 60s.


The Cena feud is stupid, but I think sometimes the WWE doesn't know what to do with guys like Bray Wyatt. They probably didn't think he'd go over that well.

Re: Wrestlemania

PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2014 4:18 pm
by TheForgivenOne
betiko wrote:I never understood wrestling. What makes the leagues decide who gets to win? Do they build scenarios for entire seasons?


All depends on how well a person is in the ring, if they can perform the moves well enough, and how well they are on the mic. If they are garbage on the mic, and can't draw heat from the crowd (If they are a Heel (Aka bad) character), or get the amount of cheers a Face (Good) character should.

A lot depends on how well a person can sell their character. If they can't, they don't get the wins or matches.

Re: Wrestlemania

PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2014 7:32 am
by Symmetry
thegreekdog wrote:
Symmetry wrote:Too soon?


Well, it happened in Kansas City, Missouri so I'm not sure how many rednecks were there. Maybe that's why the silence in respect to your post.


If you're in the crowd at a Wrestlemania, you might be a redneck. (Apologies to Jeff Foxworthy)

Re: Wrestlemania

PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2014 8:10 pm
by betiko
Symmetry wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:
Symmetry wrote:Too soon?


Well, it happened in Kansas City, Missouri so I'm not sure how many rednecks were there. Maybe that's why the silence in respect to your post.


If you're in the crowd at a Wrestlemania, you might be a redneck. (Apologies to Jeff Foxworthy)


Image

Re: Wrestlemania

PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2014 11:13 pm
by Phatscotty
Schwartzinegger looked tiny standing next to the hulkster