Conquer Club

Posted: **Sat Mar 29, 2014 12:45 pm**

e.g. It is not science to cut up stem cells, it is just immorality. This, the immorality is forced to desist while real science (identified by morality) continues.

Is Darwin moral?

If science and morality were left alone on a desert island, which would kill the other with a coconut and use their body as a raft?

Would it sink?

Posted: **Sat Mar 29, 2014 12:46 pm**

Reserved

Posted: **Sat Mar 29, 2014 12:47 pm**

This seems like BS, I don't think you've even seen a Youtube video on the topic.

Posted: **Sat Mar 29, 2014 12:50 pm**

Symmetry wrote:This seems like BS, I don't think you've even seen a Youtube video on the topic.

No, no it can't,

Posted: **Sat Mar 29, 2014 1:12 pm**

mrswdk wrote:Is Darwin moral?

Question invalid. Darwin is dead, cannot use present tense.

Posted: **Sat Mar 29, 2014 1:27 pm**

Army of GOD wrote:No, no it can't,

That.

Science might lead to things that can be used for immoral purpose but science is like a mineral. It just exists/happens.

Nuclear weapons don't kill people...

Posted: **Sat Mar 29, 2014 1:28 pm**

Yes they do.

Posted: **Sat Mar 29, 2014 1:31 pm**

Maybe a small percentage of them did.

Conquer Club

Can morality define science?

Can morality define science?

Re: Can morality define science?

Re: Can morality define science?

Re: Can morality define science?

Re: Can morality define science?

Re: Can morality define science?

Re: Can morality define science?

Caturday!