Conquer Club

show

From 'Money in Politics'
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 1#p4733901

Bernie Sanders wrote:

Phatscotty wrote:It's pretty simple really. True Lefties believe they can create heaven on earth in America. They don't know it, but their heaven is populated with horrors. The evidence is all right there in the 20th century, but they haven't seen it with their own eyes. So their utopia is always just within reach and just a matter of making new laws with a Socialist generation indoctrinated through the public education system to follow them. This is all based on 'how the way things should be', and they deal with the reality that many people have a different version of 'the way things should be', and the Socialists just need to root out those 'backwards/living in the past' ideas by breaking down Americanism, replacing values, and destroying principles, and then replacing them with 'what they think is best' for everyone else.

And because many/most of them do not even acknowledge their own soul, or that it is filled with poisonous hatred, they have reached fundamentalist zealot status and elevated Leftism to the level of official religion, rife with the very same dogma and denial they think they have risen above.

Typical conservative shrill noises we are use to hearing from those who actual think trickle down economics work. President George W. Bush left a deep financial crisis and economic collapse on President Barack Obama’s doorstep, he presided over two terms of laissez-faire supply-side policies that yielded the weakest expansion in recent U.S. economic history, marked by tepid job growth, weak private investment, stagnant family incomes, and a host of other ills that mounting housing and financial bubbles helped partially obscure.

PLAGIARISM!!! Bernie Sanders is hereby STRAIGHT BUSTED!

By Adam Hersh, Michael Ettlinger, Kalen Pruss | Wednesday, October 20, 2010

The Great Recession dealt a crushing blow to the well-being of the American people, but our economy had actually been in a tough spot for many years. Before President George W. Bush left a deep financial crisis and economic collapse on President Barack Obama’s doorstep, he presided over two terms of laissez-faire supply-side policies that yielded the weakest expansion in recent U.S. economic history, marked by tepid job growth, weak private investment, stagnant family incomes, and a host of other ills that mounting housing and financial bubbles helped partially obscure.

https://www.americanprogress.org/issues ... ic-policy/

Time to change your name already? Either be humbled or stay in dogmatic denial

Yes, I took that quote, now drag me out to the hill and tie me to the stack and burn me like the other unbelievers of your absurd ideology.

Scotty, have you ever been caught plagiarizing on CC?

i believe he was once caught in the act of self-administering a dirty sanchez.

*****

--Andy

notyou2 wrote:Scotty, have you ever been caught plagiarizing on CC?

pffff I'm plenty able to make responses on my own. Not only would I never lift the words of others and pass them off as my own. I don't even see a reason why I or anyone else would. One who plagiarizes really has no business even participating in a discussion, and a plagiarists opinions are as questionable as it gets.

I deserve credit when people use quotes of mine, and that has a lot to do with why I always give credit to another when it's theirs.

Why were you googling his quotes anyway?

Bernie Sanders wrote:Yes, I took that quote, now drag me out to the hill and tie me to the stack and burn me like the other unbelievers of your absurd ideology.

well, when you steal others words and you don't credit them with those words, that is called stealing. call it what you will, but it is stealing... i am sure you are probably of the generation where you copy pasted papers together with things like wikipedia, etc... but that isn't how the real world works... you can't just steal someone's words, claim them as your own and act like you are some sort of intellectual... it's like saying you are a doctor, because you play one on tv:




even worse, you go on the attack for being busted... for me, all of your CC posts are now subject.. . i will just consider most if not all of what you write/post, as wholly unoriginal... googled, pasted, smashed up... you are busted... you have lost all CC credibility... the black jesus weeps for your soul..-Jésus noir

p.s.-good job, Pimp Dave!!!
p.p.s.-

Metsfanmax wrote:Why were you googling his quotes anyway?

exactly what i expect from you... why don't you question the person why they were stealing another's thoughts as their own to sound more intelligent than they are... CC, another place where you are guilty for catching someone doing something wrong... you should go back to the jr. mint squad, mets...

owenshooter wrote:

Metsfanmax wrote:Why were you googling his quotes anyway?

exactly what i expect from you... why don't you question the person why they were stealing another's thoughts as their own to sound more intelligent than they are... CC, another place where you are guilty for catching someone doing something wrong... you should go back to the jr. mint squad, mets...

What questions would you like me to ask?

Crap, the Bernie Spambot AI passed the Turing test. The Chinese Room argument was all wrong, you can totally understand being a politician by angrilly recycling generic memes and random stolen quotes, so long as they are vaguely connected to the topic by keywords.

What has science done!?

Metsfanmax wrote:Why were you googling his quotes anyway?

Same reason the mods keep asking me 'How in the blue hell did you know so-n-so was a multi???. Sentience, experience, wisdom. You can't gain any of these attributes in college, even phd's are lacking. It's not a rip on young people, it's just stating as fact many/most don't have much experience outside of a classroom or 'in the real world'. Sure they gain little to lots of knowledge but rarely can possess wisdom Many times many things simply do not work the way a generalized book says it does and the only way to truly learn is to physically/mentally/spiritually go through the motions and see things for one's self. The very same reason why Winston Churchill so accurately noted how young people 18-29 who are not Liberal don't have a heart, and people over 30 who aren't Conservative don't have a brain. Let's just say I've been around the block enough times to know when someone is serving up fresh bullshit. I can smell a pig from a mile away. At face value....dewd....just look at BS's response. It doesn't even relate.

I googled the plagiarism not only to 100% confirm what I already knew in my gut, but also to see where n when BS plagiarized from.

Chalk it up to the game

Phatscotty wrote:

Metsfanmax wrote:Why were you googling his quotes anyway?

Same reason the mods keep asking me 'How in the blue hell did you know so-n-so was a multi???. Sentience, experience, wisdom. You can't gain any of these attributes in college, even phd's are lacking. It's not a rip on young people, it's just stating as fact many/most don't have much experience outside of a classroom or 'in the real world'. Sure they gain little to lots of knowledge but rarely can possess wisdom Many times many things simply do not work the way a generalized book says it does and the only way to truly learn is to physically/mentally/spiritually go through the motions and see things for one's self. The very same reason why Winston Churchill so accurately noted how young people 18-29 who are not Liberal don't have a heart, and people over 30 who aren't Conservative don't have a brain. Let's just say I've been around the block enough times to know when someone is serving up fresh bullshit. I can smell a pig from a mile away. At face value....dewd....just look at BS's response. It doesn't even relate.

I googled the plagiarism not only to 100% confirm what I already knew in my gut, but also to see where n when BS plagiarized from.

Chalk it up to the game

No, I mean, why do you give a shit?

Phatscotty wrote:

Metsfanmax wrote:Why were you googling his quotes anyway?

Same reason the mods keep asking me 'How in the blue hell did you know so-n-so was a multi???. Sentience, experience, wisdom. You can't gain any of these attributes in college, even phd's are lacking. It's not a rip on young people, it's just stating as fact many/most don't have much experience outside of a classroom or 'in the real world'. Sure they gain little to lots of knowledge but rarely can possess wisdom Many times many things simply do not work the way a generalized book says it does and the only way to truly learn is to physically/mentally/spiritually go through the motions and see things for one's self. The very same reason why Winston Churchill so accurately noted how young people 18-29 who are not Liberal don't have a heart, and people over 30 who aren't Conservative don't have a brain. Let's just say I've been around the block enough times to know when someone is serving up fresh bullshit. I can smell a pig from a mile away. At face value....dewd....just look at BS's response. It doesn't even relate.

I googled the plagiarism not only to 100% confirm what I already knew in my gut, but also to see where n when BS plagiarized from.

Chalk it up to the game

Oh brother, the great sin I have committed!

Now what is worse is this guy who likes to paint everything as black and white. The guy who is so totally in love with himself and his false ideology. The guy who is partisan to the bone.

Conservative GOOD! Liberal BAD!

You can't take the words conservative or liberal to mean one thing. Churchill was British my dear Watson. Churchill was good in uniting his country against the NAZIS, but his economic skills were quite lacking and very ARISTOCRATIC, which is very much hated in the TEA BAGGING community. Why do you think he lost his Prime Minister position right after the war?

Your ego is amazing, do you have trouble finding a hat big enough to fit your head?

Metsfanmax wrote:

Phatscotty wrote:

Metsfanmax wrote:Why were you googling his quotes anyway?

Same reason the mods keep asking me 'How in the blue hell did you know so-n-so was a multi???. Sentience, experience, wisdom. You can't gain any of these attributes in college, even phd's are lacking. It's not a rip on young people, it's just stating as fact many/most don't have much experience outside of a classroom or 'in the real world'. Sure they gain little to lots of knowledge but rarely can possess wisdom Many times many things simply do not work the way a generalized book says it does and the only way to truly learn is to physically/mentally/spiritually go through the motions and see things for one's self. The very same reason why Winston Churchill so accurately noted how young people 18-29 who are not Liberal don't have a heart, and people over 30 who aren't Conservative don't have a brain. Let's just say I've been around the block enough times to know when someone is serving up fresh bullshit. I can smell a pig from a mile away. At face value....dewd....just look at BS's response. It doesn't even relate.

I googled the plagiarism not only to 100% confirm what I already knew in my gut, but also to see where n when BS plagiarized from.

Chalk it up to the game

No, I mean, why do you give a shit?

I suppose because I am the one who made the post he seemed unable to deal with and responded to with plagiarism.

Why do you give a shit?

Phatscotty wrote:

Metsfanmax wrote:

Phatscotty wrote:

Metsfanmax wrote:Why were you googling his quotes anyway?

Same reason the mods keep asking me 'How in the blue hell did you know so-n-so was a multi???. Sentience, experience, wisdom. You can't gain any of these attributes in college, even phd's are lacking. It's not a rip on young people, it's just stating as fact many/most don't have much experience outside of a classroom or 'in the real world'. Sure they gain little to lots of knowledge but rarely can possess wisdom Many times many things simply do not work the way a generalized book says it does and the only way to truly learn is to physically/mentally/spiritually go through the motions and see things for one's self. The very same reason why Winston Churchill so accurately noted how young people 18-29 who are not Liberal don't have a heart, and people over 30 who aren't Conservative don't have a brain. Let's just say I've been around the block enough times to know when someone is serving up fresh bullshit. I can smell a pig from a mile away. At face value....dewd....just look at BS's response. It doesn't even relate.

I googled the plagiarism not only to 100% confirm what I already knew in my gut, but also to see where n when BS plagiarized from.

Chalk it up to the game

No, I mean, why do you give a shit?

I suppose because I am the one who made the post he seemed unable to deal with and responded to with plagiarism.

Why do you give a shit?

I usually get curious when people get invested into internet debates. I wonder why they feel it worth their time.

Metsfanmax wrote:

Phatscotty wrote:

Metsfanmax wrote:

Phatscotty wrote:

Metsfanmax wrote:Why were you googling his quotes anyway?

Same reason the mods keep asking me 'How in the blue hell did you know so-n-so was a multi???. Sentience, experience, wisdom. You can't gain any of these attributes in college, even phd's are lacking. It's not a rip on young people, it's just stating as fact many/most don't have much experience outside of a classroom or 'in the real world'. Sure they gain little to lots of knowledge but rarely can possess wisdom Many times many things simply do not work the way a generalized book says it does and the only way to truly learn is to physically/mentally/spiritually go through the motions and see things for one's self. The very same reason why Winston Churchill so accurately noted how young people 18-29 who are not Liberal don't have a heart, and people over 30 who aren't Conservative don't have a brain. Let's just say I've been around the block enough times to know when someone is serving up fresh bullshit. I can smell a pig from a mile away. At face value....dewd....just look at BS's response. It doesn't even relate.

I googled the plagiarism not only to 100% confirm what I already knew in my gut, but also to see where n when BS plagiarized from.

Chalk it up to the game

No, I mean, why do you give a shit?

I suppose because I am the one who made the post he seemed unable to deal with and responded to with plagiarism.

Why do you give a shit?

I usually get curious when people get invested into internet debates. I wonder why they feel it worth their time.

Some people live their lives through these internet discussions, if you want to call it a discussion, debate or plain old mud slinging. They want to boast how virile and smart they are and how stupid others are.

I guess I'm a newbie here, but I do find some posters here [even though I don't agree with them] entertaining, while others seem vindictive and hateful.

Bernie Sanders wrote:
Churchill was British my dear Watson. Churchill was good in uniting his country against the NAZIS, but his economic skills were quite lacking and very ARISTOCRATIC, which is very much hated in the TEA BAGGING community.

---------WHOA!WHOA!WHOA!...wait a minute. Now,I make fun of the lobsterbacks from time to time. BUT I will not let someone drag the name of the Greatest Man of the 20th century,through the mud. Winston Churchill was a great public speaker for over 67 years. A war hero. It wasn't Churchill who handed over Eastern Europe to Stalin at Yalta. IT WAS FDR. Maybe you got FDR mixed up as Churchill. Churchill lost the 45 election. But was made Prime Minister again in 1951, DUMB ASS. ConfederateSS.out!(The Blue and Silver Rebellion)...

Bernie Sanders wrote:

Phatscotty wrote:

Metsfanmax wrote:Why were you googling his quotes anyway?

Same reason the mods keep asking me 'How in the blue hell did you know so-n-so was a multi???. Sentience, experience, wisdom. You can't gain any of these attributes in college, even phd's are lacking. It's not a rip on young people, it's just stating as fact many/most don't have much experience outside of a classroom or 'in the real world'. Sure they gain little to lots of knowledge but rarely can possess wisdom Many times many things simply do not work the way a generalized book says it does and the only way to truly learn is to physically/mentally/spiritually go through the motions and see things for one's self. The very same reason why Winston Churchill so accurately noted how young people 18-29 who are not Liberal don't have a heart, and people over 30 who aren't Conservative don't have a brain. Let's just say I've been around the block enough times to know when someone is serving up fresh bullshit. I can smell a pig from a mile away. At face value....dewd....just look at BS's response. It doesn't even relate.

I googled the plagiarism not only to 100% confirm what I already knew in my gut, but also to see where n when BS plagiarized from.

Chalk it up to the game

Oh brother, the great sin I have committed!

Now what is worse is this guy who likes to paint everything as black and white. The guy who is so totally in love with himself and his false ideology. The guy who is partisan to the bone.

Conservative GOOD! Liberal BAD!

You can't take the words conservative or liberal to mean one thing. Churchill was British my dear Watson. Churchill was good in uniting his country against the NAZIS, but his economic skills were quite lacking and very ARISTOCRATIC, which is very much hated in the TEA BAGGING community. Why do you think he lost his Prime Minister position right after the war?

Your ego is amazing, do you have trouble finding a hat big enough to fit your head?

Haha. #1 Who cares where Churchill was from or how long he held his position when the words he spoke are absolutely true? Obama could have said them, and I would have quoted him/GIVEN HIM CREDIT FOR HIS CONTRIBUTIONS just the same.

#2 I'm trying to help Mets in what little ways I can even though he probably dislikes me thoroughly, and I probably do that because I see myself in him and I really do wish someone would have at least mentioned a thing or two my way so I could have at least thought about an issue under another light instead of being trained to reject issues and opinions that come from another angle based on experience.

#3 I do not subscribe to Liberal=Bad and Conservative=Good, not one bit. I've talked more shit about the top ranking Republican in the country in the last 2 weeks than I have about Obama or Clinton in the last year. Is that what a hardcore extreme partisan does? I don't think so. I will tell you straight up it's no secret I absolutely do subscribe to Socialism=BAD. As for Liberals, I've been called a Liberal (with the hiss) far too many times to think they are/were bad. I don't ever try to shut up Lefties and I support them speaking up and fighting for what they believe in. One small problem I have in this area however is that I don't know (at least know of) many Lefties who will return the RESPECT to stand up for my Freedom to speak my mind and fight for what I believe in. You might remember, everyone was always trying to get me banned here, and I doubt it was because a double post seriously pissed anyone off enough to file a report on me. Hey, live n learn right? I think Americans should always try to keep in mind, the right Wing and the Left Wing belongs to the same hard ass pterodactyl.. WRAHHHH!




#4 I'm far from in love with myself. I have way too many problems of my own and of my own doing and a great many things I can and do try to work on all the time. Truth be told, Mets and I have probably logged more than a couple hundred hours communicating about all kinds of issues and topics imaginable. My response was simply from Phatscotty to Metsfan, and highly based on our conversation history. If I was responding to virtually anybody else, I never would have even brought up the inexperience angle or college in any way whatsoever, in fact almost everyone else I simply would have posted a video with no text as an answer to any similar question. It would have looked like this.

NightStrike wrote:How did you know plagiarism was committed and to google search the BS post Phats?

ConfederateSS wrote:

Bernie Sanders wrote:
Churchill was British my dear Watson. Churchill was good in uniting his country against the NAZIS, but his economic skills were quite lacking and very ARISTOCRATIC, which is very much hated in the TEA BAGGING community.

---------WHOA!WHOA!WHOA!...wait a minute. Now,I make fun of the lobsterbacks from time to time. BUT I will not let someone drag the name of the Greatest Man of the 20th century,through the mud. Winston Churchill was a great public speaker for over 67 years. A war hero. It wasn't Churchill who handed over Eastern Europe to Stalin at Yalta. IT WAS FDR. Maybe you got FDR mixed up as Churchill. Churchill lost the 45 election. But was made Prime Minister again in 1951, DUMB ASS. ConfederateSS.out!(The Blue and Silver Rebellion)...

Keep flying your treasonous flag. You have no right to criticize one of the greatest Presidents in history.

et’s have a look at some of Churchill’s thoughts throughout his career, shall we?

-On imperialism:



I do not agree that the dog in a manger has the final right to the manger even though he may have lain there for a very long time. I do not admit that right. I do not admit for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race has come in and taken their place.

Dog. Got it.

-On India:



Churchill, speaking of the Indian people, said that he had a difficult time dealing with "the humiliation of being kicked out of India by the beastliest people in the world next to the Germans."

And he really didn’t like that Gandhi guy (you know, the way he wanted to be treated as if he were a human being and all). Churchill:



It is alarming and also nauseating to see Mr. Gandhi, a seditious Middle Temple lawyer of the type well-known in the East, now posing as a fakir, striding half naked up the steps of the Viceregal palace to parley on equal terms with the representative of the King-Emperor.

And, more to the point:



I hate Indians. They are a beastly people with a beastly religion.

-And on the Sudanese, whom he observed as they were gunned down:



The huge area contains many differences of climate and conditions, and these have produced peculiar and diverse breeds of men. The Soudanese [sic] are of many tribes, but two main races can be clearly distinguished: the aboriginal natives, and the Arab settlers. The indigenous inhabitants of the country were negroes as black as coal. Strong, virile, and simple-minded savages, they lived as we may imagine prehistoric men - hunting, fighting, marrying, and dying, with no ideas beyond the gratification of their physical desires, and no fears save those engendered by ghosts, witchcraft, the worship of ancestors, and other forms of superstition common among peoples of low development. They displayed the virtues of barbarism. They were brave and honest. The smallness of their intelligence excused the degradation of their habits. Their ignorance secured their innocence. Yet their eulogy must be short, for though their customs, language, and appearance vary...the history of all is a confused legend of strife and misery, their natures are uniformly cruel and thriftless, and their condition is one of equal squalor and want.

And on those Sudanese of so-called mixed race:



The qualities of mongrels are rarely admirable, and the mixture of the Arab and negro types has produced a debased and cruel breed, more shocking because they are more intelligent than the primitive savages.

-On his plan for forced sterilization of inferior types:



The unnatural and increasingly rapid growth of the feeble-minded and insane classes, coupled as it is with a steady restriction among all the thrifty, energetic and superior stocks, constitutes a national and race danger which it is impossible to exaggerate... I feel that the source from which the stream of madness is fed should be cut off and sealed up before another year has passed.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/02/1 ... s-a-Racist

Bernie Sanders wrote:*PROVEN PLAGIARIZER*

ehhhh... sorry, no longer interested in anything you have to post in any forum... you steal others thoughts/published words, and try to pass them off on your own... the black jesus has spoken...-Jésus noir

owenshooter wrote:

Bernie Sanders wrote:*PROVEN PLAGIARIZER*

ehhhh... sorry, no longer interested in anything you have to post in any forum... you steal others thoughts/published words, and try to pass them off on your own... the black jesus has spoken...-Jésus noir

Better to post something occasionally interesting once in a while, even if not by one's own hand, then never having anything interesting to say at all.

owenshooter wrote:

Bernie Sanders wrote:*PROVEN PLAGIARIZER*

ehhhh... sorry, no longer interested in anything you have to post in any forum... you steal others thoughts/published words, and try to pass them off on your own... the black jesus has spoken...-Jésus noir

Judge NOT or you shall be judged.

Another hypocritical poster who disgraces the name of Jesus Christ.

Move on, nothing to see.