notyou2 wrote:So let me get this straight.
A European nation invades an area and claims it. A different European nation invades an area near the first and claims that. The 2 European nations arbitrarily draw lines in the sand saying which nation controls which territory without any regard whatsoever for the boundaries that have been in the area for centuries.
The subjugated areas later throw off the yoke of repression after a long protracted battle with the invaders, yet now that they have the chance to restore historic borders and tribal lands, they decline to do so.
I am all for a united Kurdistan. They seem to be one voice of reason in a chaotic area.
The Iraqi and Syrian Kurds probably won't face much issue (Syria is in chaos and Iraq's government is struggling to expand control beyond a certain point). It's the ones in Iran and Turkey that are the main problems with a united Kurdistan. I know Turkey is militantly against it (and thus against losing a good chunk of territory to a new nation). Iran, not sure on the specifics, but if I remember right, they too are against their Kurds separating, if not militantly, but adamantly.