Conquer Club

Posted: **Fri Sep 09, 2016 9:55 am**

No, I wouldn't call him the "new Hitler" although it is somewhat disappointing.

I guess it also means no National Geographic reprints either. :twisted:

Posted: **Fri Sep 09, 2016 10:28 am**

Does this mean that Zuckerberg gets off on the Vietnam napalm photo? Him and xeno.

Posted: **Fri Sep 09, 2016 12:36 pm**

he's the old Hitler

Posted: **Fri Sep 09, 2016 5:54 pm**

Trust you to keep pushing the boundaries on posting pictures of underage girls. You narrowly avoided a ban last time, so don't pretend to be virtuous using this as an example.

How about you quit pushing your agenda, M? The photo is important enough in its own right without your, frankly creepy, attention.

Posted: **Fri Sep 09, 2016 6:06 pm**

Symmetry wrote:Trust you to keep pushing the boundaries on posting pictures of underage girls. You narrowly avoided a ban last time, so don't pretend to be virtuous using this as an example.

How about you quit pushing your agenda, M? The photo is important enough in its own right without your, frankly creepy, attention.

Y'all want a single say fuck that. Fuck that, fuck that.

Posted: **Fri Sep 09, 2016 6:17 pm**

Serbia wrote:
Symmetry wrote:Trust you to keep pushing the boundaries on posting pictures of underage girls. You narrowly avoided a ban last time, so don't pretend to be virtuous using this as an example.

How about you quit pushing your agenda, M? The photo is important enough in its own right without your, frankly creepy, attention.

Y'all want a single say fuck that. Fuck that, fuck that.

Not at all, precisely the opposite, in fact. Facebook's policy, as indeed CC's, is designed to remove the kinds of sexually explicit pictures of minors that got M into trouble. While I disagree with Facebook on this issue, I can see why they have the policy in place.

There will always be people who have an inclination to post pictures for their own gratification.

Posted: **Fri Sep 09, 2016 6:18 pm**

Wasn't Hitler only half Jewish?

Posted: **Fri Sep 09, 2016 7:02 pm**

william18 wrote:Wasn't Hitler only half Jewish?

Hitler was a Buddhist, hence all the swastikas.

Posted: **Fri Sep 09, 2016 8:59 pm**

Posted: **Fri Sep 09, 2016 9:20 pm**

mrswdk wrote:
william18 wrote:Wasn't Hitler only half Jewish?

Hitler was a Buddhist, hence all the swastikas.

Or was he Hindu?

Posted: **Tue Sep 20, 2016 4:02 am**

Better quote this one before it gets removed by our own Mark Zuckerburg..

mrswdk wrote:
Facebook has controversially removed the iconic image of a girl fleeing a Napalm attack during the Vietnam war from a post, on the grounds of nudity.

The editor of Norwegian newspaper Aftenposten said the entire post, which was about iconic war imagery, was later deleted and the account of the reporter behind it suspended.

Espen Egil Hansenhas accused Mark Zuckerberg of "an abuse of power".

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-37318031

I for one am sickened, while also highly apprehensive as we begin our descent down the slippery slope.

Time to stop drinking tap water.

Posted: **Tue Sep 20, 2016 4:22 am**

Thanks for your report. We take a very hard line on this sort of thing.

Posted: **Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:32 am**

Question marks?

Posted: **Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:36 pm**

Some people bruise easily. :twisted:

Posted: **Mon Oct 03, 2016 1:26 pm**

tzor wrote:Some people bruise easily.

Conquer Club

??

??

Re: Is Mark Zuckerberg the new Hitler?

Re: Is Mark Zuckerberg the new Hitler?

Re: Is Mark Zuckerberg the new Hitler?

Re: Is Mark Zuckerberg the new Hitler?

Re: Is Mark Zuckerberg the new Hitler?

Re: Is Mark Zuckerberg the new Hitler?

Re: Is Mark Zuckerberg the new Hitler?

Re: Is Mark Zuckerberg the new Hitler?

Re: Is Mark Zuckerberg the new Hitler?

Re: Is Mark Zuckerberg the new Hitler?

Re: Is Mark Zuckerberg the new Hitler?

Re: ??

Re: ??

Re: ??

Re: ??