Conquer Club

More innovation and progress from President Donald J. Trump! The president is planning on nationalizing the U.S.' nascent 5G network for the benefit of the farmers and workers.

The Trump administration is considering nationalizing the next-generation, high-speed 5G wireless network, according to reports Sunday. Axios first reported the proposal, and White House sources later confirmed it to Reuters.

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/trump ... 2018-01-28

Everyone who was complaining about the blah blah blah net neutrality B.S. - Trump is doing something 100X more revolutionary than net neutrality; he is handing ownership of 5G to the people. Such a notion would have been anathema to the corporate bought-and-paid-for Barack Obama and his band of vanilla stooges.

Trump continues to carry-out his promise of transforming the Republican Party into a workers party.

cute photo of a sham marriage, saxi...

How long b4 "govt runs it" becomes "govt sells it to friends?"

I thought republicans were against socialism? So why the propaganda for centralization and a 'workers party'?

I mean, it's for spying, so of course.

Neoteny wrote:I mean, it's for spying, so of course.

Good Ol' Strava.

waauw wrote:I thought republicans were against socialism? So why the propaganda for centralization and a 'workers party'?

saxi's not a Republican, he's a Trumpian.

Or as he likes to call it, neo-gramscian.

waauw wrote:I thought republicans were against socialism? So why the propaganda for centralization and a 'workers party'?

Republicans were always for Corporate Welfare. Their tax reform bill proves they are for Socialism as long as it benefits their big money contributors.

waauw wrote:I thought republicans were against socialism? So why the propaganda for centralization and a 'workers party'?

The Democratic Party used to be pro-slavery. Parties change. Trump is now remaking the Republican Party in his vision which means ending corporate welfare to multi-billion dollar business conglomerates, supporting organized labor, and nationalizing the principal utilities for the benefit of the militarized masses.

The Republican Party is no longer a staid conservative party, it is now a populist, revolutionary, national workers party.

Donald Trump’s economic adviser Stephen Moore told a group of top Republicans last week that they now belong to a fundamentally different political party.

Moore surprised some of the Republican lawmakers assembled at their closed-door whip meeting last Tuesday when he told them they should no longer think of themselves as belonging to the conservative party of Ronald Reagan.

They now belong to Trump’s populist working-class party, he said.

A source briefed on the House GOP whip meeting — which Moore attended as a guest of Majority Whip Steve Scalise — said several lawmakers told him they were taken aback by the economist’s comments.

http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/30 ... gans-party

This is the reason for the ongoing purge of people like Jeff Flake from the new party of the farmers and workers. They wouldn't accept the National Reorganization, therefore they were destroyed.

i.e. Trump has come around to the view that the Washington Consensus has failed and that the Beijing Consensus is the future

mrswdk wrote:i.e. Trump has come around to the view that the Washington Consensus has failed and that the Beijing Consensus is the future

Neo-Mercantilism was around long before the Beijing Consensus, but okay. #NoLabels

Trump fairly recently: tax breaks for businesses!
Trump more recently: oh gawd this government is so shit it can't even pass a budget
Trump now: we need to nationalize everything and become a worker's party!

Trump throughout all of the above: Xi Jinping is a 'very special' man and a 'friend' who he has 'wonderful' visits to

Neoteny wrote:I mean, it's for spying, so of course.

obama would know about that eh?

karel wrote:

Neoteny wrote:I mean, it's for spying, so of course.

obama would know about that eh?

Yeah, he was almost as bad as bush 2 when it comes to spying, extrajudicial murder, and imperialism. He was a flawed centrist that I would regret voting for if the alternatives available were anything other than fascists.

Neoliberal dems are godawful, and yet they're still light years better than the shitstains offered by the republican party

cant wait to see whats in the fisa memos,i know the dems dont like it,lol

Lol it's funny how suddenly the republicans are so interested in FISA violations now. But whatever, the federal police are no ally of the left and the democrats voted for the damn thing, so any political repurcussions due to either actual violations or perceived slights through the weird lenses the howling right wears all the time makes little difference to me beyond exposing the american system as the joke that it is.

The president is not some high operating chessmaster. He's a clown riding on the coattails of the ghouls of his party. We didn't need spooks to figure this out.

Neoteny wrote:Lol it's funny how suddenly the republicans are so interested in FISA violations now. But whatever, the federal police are no ally of the left and the democrats voted for the damn thing, so any political repurcussions due to either actual violations or perceived slights through the weird lenses the howling right wears all the time makes little difference to me beyond exposing the american system as the joke that it is.

The president is not some high operating chessmaster. He's a clown riding on the coattails of the ghouls of his party. We didn't need spooks to figure this out.

I don't necessarily agree with all of this, but it is beautiful poetry! Welcome back, Neo...

Neoteny wrote:almost as bad

Tell that to Obama's victims like Abe Awlaki - Obama was the president who liked to order children burned alive with his Hellfire missiles -



Fact: Obama has ordered more children killed than Trump.

That kid looks pretty shifty. I'm going to guess it was self defense.

saxitoxin wrote:

Neoteny wrote:almost as bad

Tell that to Obama's victims like Abe Awlaki - Obama was the president who liked to order children burned alive with his Hellfire missiles -



Fact: Obama has ordered more children killed than Trump.

Your bullshit game has gone down the pipes Sax Attack. You should retire. I specified he was almost as bad as Bush 2; you know, the war criminal. Despite Barrack's best efforts, he hasn't matched the sheer calamity that blankfaced hack and his goblin buddy Cheney inflicted all over the world. Countless children sizzling under shimmering warmth of white phosphorus has been the MO of US presidents for more than a couple terms.

But to top it off, you try to compare a braak iv geriatric's first year with the entirety of a strapping young commander in chief's full two terms at the helm of the rc murder program. Give the bumbling tv show host some time. Maybe he'll forget what his sound-of-mind-but-just-actually-evil handlers tell him to do and he won't have the highest mid-east body count in the last decade or so. That number mught be reserved for good ol' american babies.

Are you suggesting Dick hung up his spurs when Barack was in office?

Neoteny wrote:Your bullshit game has gone down the pipes Sax Attack. You should retire. I specified he was almost as bad as Bush 2; you know, the war criminal.

Yes, I know the one. The Bush denounced by President Trump. The Bush whose sex molester family voted for Hillary.

Neoteny wrote:Despite Barrack's best efforts, he hasn't matched the sheer calamity that blankfaced hack and his goblin buddy Cheney inflicted all over the world. Countless children sizzling under shimmering warmth of white phosphorus has been the MO of US presidents for more than a couple terms.

But to top it off, you try to compare a braak iv geriatric's first year with the entirety of a strapping young commander in chief's full two terms at the helm of the rc murder program. Give the bumbling tv show host some time. Maybe he'll forget what his sound-of-mind-but-just-actually-evil handlers tell him to do and he won't have the highest mid-east body count in the last decade or so. That number mught be reserved for good ol' american babies.

That's a lot of slogans, metaphors, and jazz hands to cram into just five sentences.

Translation: "I would rather support a confirmed international war criminal - Barack Obama - than a president who has never launched a war, Donald J. Trump. Because the war criminal gave me a couple hundred bucks worth of goodies and free stuff."

saxitoxin wrote: The Bush denounced by President Trump. The Bush whose sex molester family voted for Hillary.

Need more input.

Here is a video clip featuring former presidents named George Bush. Is the bad one in it?

saxitoxin wrote:

Neoteny wrote:Your bullshit game has gone down the pipes Sax Attack. You should retire. I specified he was almost as bad as Bush 2; you know, the war criminal.

Yes, I know the one. The Bush denounced by President Trump. The Bush whose sex molester family voted for Hillary.

Neoteny wrote:Despite Barrack's best efforts, he hasn't matched the sheer calamity that blankfaced hack and his goblin buddy Cheney inflicted all over the world. Countless children sizzling under shimmering warmth of white phosphorus has been the MO of US presidents for more than a couple terms.

But to top it off, you try to compare a braak iv geriatric's first year with the entirety of a strapping young commander in chief's full two terms at the helm of the rc murder program. Give the bumbling tv show host some time. Maybe he'll forget what his sound-of-mind-but-just-actually-evil handlers tell him to do and he won't have the highest mid-east body count in the last decade or so. That number mught be reserved for good ol' american babies.

That's a lot of slogans, metaphors, and jazz hands to cram into just five sentences.

Translation: "I would rather support a confirmed international war criminal - Barack Obama - than a president who has never launched a war, Donald J. Trump."

You're, uh, parsing out "almost as bad as bush," and "rc murderer," and "searing the flesh from thousands of people" as support? That's some kind of projecting. Is there a stronger word than projecting? Whatever. It'll be lost on whatever ill-formed gimmick you've got going on here.

Bushes and clintons and obamas oh my. They were all beholden to someone that wasn't people, at home or abroad, who needed help. Trump just doesn't give a f*ck (or can't because of the caverns in his brain) about anyone who isn't himself. A perfect candidate for a civil servant.