Page 1 of 1

Should a hammer refer to someone who brings ham?

PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2018 12:33 pm
by DoomYoshi
On one hand, this most important role doesn't have a proper name (who does bring the bacon?). On the other hand, people can't just go around changing the language all willy-nilly. It's why we have standards.

Re: Should a hammer refer to someone who brings ham?

PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:06 pm
by jusplay4fun
Language is fluid and changes; that is the nature of life.

There are rules for language, but there is "tweaking" at its edges.

That is my experience and understanding.

JP

Re: Should a hammer refer to someone who brings ham?

PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:08 pm
by DoomYoshi
So you are ok if some people use the word hammer as a short form for hambringer.

Re: Should a hammer refer to someone who brings ham?

PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:16 pm
by jonesthecurl
If you bit somebody who brought the ham, but just as a hobby, would you be a hammer-chewer?

Re: Should a hammer refer to someone who brings ham?

PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2018 1:25 pm
by DoomYoshi
You'd be a sneeze, or a ha'chew for short.

EDIT: I looked up hammer chewer in the slang dictionary.

I guess as long as you don't bite them and get paid for it (just for a hobby), you could still be a hammer chewer.

Re: Should a hammer refer to someone who brings ham?

PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2018 3:40 pm
by Dukasaur
Hambringer would be a welcome addition to the language. There is already harbinger, and its illiterate cousin harbringer. Adding a third word that could be confused with the first two would vastly improve the comedic prospects. It could be enough to bring Abbot and Costello back from the grave.

Re: Should a hammer refer to someone who brings ham?

PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2018 7:13 pm
by 2dimes
I'd like to second the motion to bring out Zombie Abbot and Costello.