Conquer Club

Iran 1, Norway 0 (tanker damaged)
Iran 1, Japan 0 (tanker damaged)
Iran 1, USA 0 (drone destroyed)

Making Trump look reasonable...priceless.

pretty sure that drone getting shot down was a set-up to find out who is running the other black site in Iran.. the drone was flying at 65,000 feet.. it could have easily avoided a missile strike

If we would have attacked Nancy would have been on CNN this morning talking about the poor plight of the Ayatollah.

do you think those crippling US sanctions might have anything to do w/Iran's "crappy" economy, HR? food for thought.

riskllama wrote:do you think those crippling US sanctions might have anything to do w/Iran's "crappy" economy, HR? food for thought.

probably.. ironic they stopped chanting " death to America " once Trump got elected...

stfu, NP...

riskllama wrote:stfu, NP...

I think a theocracy that exports weapons is a bit disjointed.

NomadPatriot wrote:

riskllama wrote:do you think those crippling US sanctions might have anything to do w/Iran's "crappy" economy, HR? food for thought.

probably.. ironic they stopped chanting " death to America " once Trump got elected...

Oh nomey, they never have stopped shouting death to america. You just believe what the demagogue says, and you can't seem to read past headlines.

https://www.apnews.com/b366e2dbdec548808c7313fd06bc9118


On June 23, 2017, during Quds Day, protestors chanted “Death to America” and “Death to Israel”.
On April 25, 2018, Iran announces that the “Death to America” emoji would be included in the messaging app.
On May 9, 2018, an American flag was burned in the Iranian Parliament amidst chants of 'Death to America' after President Donald Trump withdrew from the nuclear deal with Iran.
On November 4, 2018, Louis Farrakhan, the leader of the religious group Nation of Islam, led a “Death to America” chant during a solidarity trip to Iran, ahead of sanctions expected to be imposed by the Trump administration.

I think one of the problems is that nobody trusts Trump's intelligence, Trump's intelligence regarding Iran, Trump's statements about Iran, Trump's foreign policy in general, Trump's commitments to policies regarding Iran, Trump's statements about his policies regarding Iran. Trump's statements about his own intelligence, Trump's statements about US intelligence, the statements of Trump's appointees, the appointment of Trump's experts...

Well, you get it...

Symmetry wrote:I think one of the problems is that nobody trusts Trump's intelligence, Trump's intelligence regarding Iran, Trump's statements about Iran, Trump's foreign policy in general, Trump's commitments to policies regarding Iran, Trump's statements about his policies regarding Iran. Trump's statements about his own intelligence, Trump's statements about US intelligence, the statements of Trump's appointees, the appointment of Trump's experts...

Well, you get it...

how's that UK leader doing..? what was her name.. April or something like that.
she sure tried to get the people to follow her lead on the Brexit deal..
how did that work out for her..?

NomadPatriot wrote:

Symmetry wrote:I think one of the problems is that nobody trusts Trump's intelligence, Trump's intelligence regarding Iran, Trump's statements about Iran, Trump's foreign policy in general, Trump's commitments to policies regarding Iran, Trump's statements about his policies regarding Iran. Trump's statements about his own intelligence, Trump's statements about US intelligence, the statements of Trump's appointees, the appointment of Trump's experts...

Well, you get it...

how's that UK leader doing..? what was her name.. April or something like that.
she sure tried to get the people to follow her lead on the Brexit deal..
how did that work out for her..?

Elizabeth II? She's mighty fine. We even have a song about her. How's your boy Trump doing?

There have been concerns that he might not be the most reliably sane office holder:

Symmetry wrote:

NomadPatriot wrote:

Symmetry wrote:I think one of the problems is that nobody trusts Trump's intelligence, Trump's intelligence regarding Iran, Trump's statements about Iran, Trump's foreign policy in general, Trump's commitments to policies regarding Iran, Trump's statements about his policies regarding Iran. Trump's statements about his own intelligence, Trump's statements about US intelligence, the statements of Trump's appointees, the appointment of Trump's experts...

Well, you get it...

how's that UK leader doing..? what was her name.. April or something like that.
she sure tried to get the people to follow her lead on the Brexit deal..
how did that work out for her..?

Elizabeth II? She's mighty fine. We even have a song about her. How's your boy Trump doing?

There have been concerns that he might not be the most reliably sane office holder:

wow Sym.. you cannot even remember her... and she ran your country .. LOLOL

but of course your not used to a leader loving their own country....

NomadPatriot wrote:

Symmetry wrote:

NomadPatriot wrote:

Symmetry wrote:I think one of the problems is that nobody trusts Trump's intelligence, Trump's intelligence regarding Iran, Trump's statements about Iran, Trump's foreign policy in general, Trump's commitments to policies regarding Iran, Trump's statements about his policies regarding Iran. Trump's statements about his own intelligence, Trump's statements about US intelligence, the statements of Trump's appointees, the appointment of Trump's experts...

Well, you get it...

how's that UK leader doing..? what was her name.. April or something like that.
she sure tried to get the people to follow her lead on the Brexit deal..
how did that work out for her..?

Elizabeth II? She's mighty fine. We even have a song about her. How's your boy Trump doing?

There have been concerns that he might not be the most reliably sane office holder:

wow Sym.. you cannot even remember her... and she ran your country .. LOLOL

She's been the Queen since 1953, mate. If you're having remembering names, it ain't my problem.

sym.. you and everyone else knows the queen does not run the country.. keep paying dumb bud.. if you are intentionally ignoring a conversation about Teresa May.. it shows how much you know your leader was a whack job no one liked or wanted. …

Symmetry wrote:She's been the Queen since 1953, mate. If you're having remembering names, it ain't my problem.

only problem I see is your game tonight. 1st you thought HR was the OP of another thread.. now you are having "TROUBLE' remembering to include words in your posts..

HitRed wrote:I think a theocracy that exports weapons is a bit disjointed.

I wouldn't say the US isn't a theocracy just yet, but give us time.

spurgistan wrote:

HitRed wrote:I think a theocracy that exports weapons is a bit disjointed.

I wouldn't say the US isn't a theocracy just yet, but give us time.

pretty sure he wasn't referring to the United States..

NomadPatriot wrote:

spurgistan wrote:

HitRed wrote:I think a theocracy that exports weapons is a bit disjointed.

I wouldn't say the US isn't a theocracy just yet, but give us time.

pretty sure he wasn't referring to the United States..

You read but don't comprehend. You write but you do it without thinking.

Just surprised why anyone would try to reply to your utter bullshit and moronic statements.

Does seem you have several Trump supporters who jump on your coat tails whenever the subject of Trump cums up. The Clown Posse!

Bernie Sanders wrote:Does seem you have several Trump supporters who jump on your coat tails whenever the subject of Trump cums up.

'Trump Cums Up'...
geez Bernie..
we now know what you are thinking about when the topic is Trump..
him.. CUMMING...

Bernie Sanders wrote:You write but you do it without thinking.

Get back to work Bernie, those floors need to look mopped!

riskllama wrote:do you think those crippling US sanctions might have anything to do w/Iran's "crappy" economy, HR? food for thought.

ikr

>Iran signs up to and complies with nuclear deal agreed by US, Russia, China, UK, France and Germany
>America puts extreme economic sanctions on Iran anyway
>America escalates sanctions
>Iranian economy driven into ground
>America moves troops into region and makes numerous comments about going to war with Iran
>Iran shoots down American drone
>HR: 'lol Iran is acting so unreasonable makes Trump look clever'

NomadPatriot wrote:sym.. you and everyone else knows the queen does not run the country.. keep paying dumb bud..

I think NP needs to understand UK politics. The queen of england is in fact the supreme ruler. Nothing comes into law without her signature.
She also holds the power to single handedly sack the parliament.

TeeGee wrote:

NomadPatriot wrote:sym.. you and everyone else knows the queen does not run the country.. keep paying dumb bud..

I think NP needs to understand UK politics. The queen of england is in fact the supreme ruler. Nothing comes into law without her signature.
She also holds the power to single handedly sack the parliament.

I said 'run the country'. .so, according to you TeeGee.. the Queen runs the daily operations of the United Kingdom. she runs the country.. ? or does the Prime Minister do that job.. ?


http://royalcentral.co.uk/blogs/insight/what-are-the-queens-powers-22069

mrswdk wrote:

riskllama wrote:do you think those crippling US sanctions might have anything to do w/Iran's "crappy" economy, HR? food for thought.

ikr

>Iran signs up to and complies with nuclear deal agreed by US, Russia, China, UK, France and Germany
>America puts extreme economic sanctions on Iran anyway
>America escalates sanctions
>Iranian economy driven into ground
>America moves troops into region and makes numerous comments about going to war with Iran
>Iran shoots down American drone
>HR: 'lol Iran is acting so unreasonable makes Trump look clever'

+1

NomadPatriot wrote:

TeeGee wrote:

NomadPatriot wrote:sym.. you and everyone else knows the queen does not run the country.. keep paying dumb bud..

I think NP needs to understand UK politics. The queen of england is in fact the supreme ruler. Nothing comes into law without her signature.
She also holds the power to single handedly sack the parliament.

I said 'run the country'. .so, according to you TeeGee.. the Queen runs the daily operations of the United Kingdom. she runs the country.. ? or does the Prime Minister do that job.. ?


http://royalcentral.co.uk/blogs/insight/what-are-the-queens-powers-22069

If you require facts. The Prime minister can not make daily operational decisions either, it needs the majority of the parliament, not an individual. And you still quote blogs as sources for factual information? I thought I might have taught you something