Moderator: Community Team
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
saxitoxin wrote:What's a Big Monkey?
KoolBak wrote:How desperate does one have to be to post crap like this to disparage the USA? I'd say in the top 8% of blind haters as a desperation measurement.
Apparently this survey asked about 1200 people. A similar percentage of them said they could defeat an elephant. And a grizzly. And there wasn't a big difference between those being men or women. Oh....28% said they could NOT beat a rat....
I'm assuming the 1200 were heroine addicts, or confederate's family members.
Since people are universally stupid, I assume this would be similar worldwide.
And it's awesome that this piece of hard hitting journalism allowed MrSwdke to slip in an American anti-gun jab; well played (polite clapping noises).
Oh, and I bought two new guns last month! Yay!!
bigtoughralf wrote:saxitoxin wrote:What's a Big Monkey?
Bigger than a small monkey.
Maxleod wrote:bigtoughralf wrote:saxitoxin wrote:What's a Big Monkey?
Bigger than a small monkey.
Saxi's question actually is a valid one. Does "Big Monkey" means bigger than a small monkey, or Great Ape?
Because a gorilla would smash any human to a pulp. Litterally. DNA will be the only way to determine the fool's identity.
Even an adult male chimp could easily kill any man. Maybe not a two meters heavyweight boxer/martial artist, but even then, I'm not sure.
*saxitoxin… I think he is good at fighting with his words, but I suspect he’s a pussy IRL. Given a choice amongst all the “animals” here I would choose Saxi as he would be the easiest and expect I’d lose zero “hit points” in this fight.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
jimboston wrote:*Dog… I voted yes against a dog, but this is a trickier proposition. I would think it’d be easy against any “dog” under 30lbs. 30-100lb dogs would be harder, but they really only have one manner of attack… I would sacrifice my left forearm to the attacking dog and just come down on it’s head hard with my right. It becomes different when the dogs get bigger like 100lbs or more… and there’s another variable, if the dog has been trained to attack people that could change the proposition. If the dog is big enough and/or smart enough to knock you off your feet then much of your advantage is lost.
Dukasaur wrote:jimboston wrote:*Dog… I voted yes against a dog, but this is a trickier proposition. I would think it’d be easy against any “dog” under 30lbs. 30-100lb dogs would be harder, but they really only have one manner of attack… I would sacrifice my left forearm to the attacking dog and just come down on it’s head hard with my right. It becomes different when the dogs get bigger like 100lbs or more… and there’s another variable, if the dog has been trained to attack people that could change the proposition. If the dog is big enough and/or smart enough to knock you off your feet then much of your advantage is lost.
Large dogs tend to lunge, and if their lunge is successful then yes, they can bring you down.
However, they are also vulnerable during their lunge. A well-aimed kick in the ribcage or a parry that gets your hand on their throat can eliminate their advantage. You only get one chance at it, though, so better not miss.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
Dukasaur wrote:jimboston wrote:*Dog… I voted yes against a dog, but this is a trickier proposition. I would think it’d be easy against any “dog” under 30lbs. 30-100lb dogs would be harder, but they really only have one manner of attack… I would sacrifice my left forearm to the attacking dog and just come down on it’s head hard with my right. It becomes different when the dogs get bigger like 100lbs or more… and there’s another variable, if the dog has been trained to attack people that could change the proposition. If the dog is big enough and/or smart enough to knock you off your feet then much of your advantage is lost.
Large dogs tend to lunge, and if their lunge is successful then yes, they can bring you down.
However, they are also vulnerable during their lunge. A well-aimed kick in the ribcage or a parry that gets your hand on their throat can eliminate their advantage. You only get one chance at it, though, so better not miss.
saxitoxin wrote:Dukasaur wrote:jimboston wrote:*Dog… I voted yes against a dog, but this is a trickier proposition. I would think it’d be easy against any “dog” under 30lbs. 30-100lb dogs would be harder, but they really only have one manner of attack… I would sacrifice my left forearm to the attacking dog and just come down on it’s head hard with my right. It becomes different when the dogs get bigger like 100lbs or more… and there’s another variable, if the dog has been trained to attack people that could change the proposition. If the dog is big enough and/or smart enough to knock you off your feet then much of your advantage is lost.
Large dogs tend to lunge, and if their lunge is successful then yes, they can bring you down.
However, they are also vulnerable during their lunge. A well-aimed kick in the ribcage or a parry that gets your hand on their throat can eliminate their advantage. You only get one chance at it, though, so better not miss.
Also, if you grab a dog by its hinders and lift it up it's powerless.
jimboston wrote:saxitoxin wrote:Dukasaur wrote:jimboston wrote:*Dog… I voted yes against a dog, but this is a trickier proposition. I would think it’d be easy against any “dog” under 30lbs. 30-100lb dogs would be harder, but they really only have one manner of attack… I would sacrifice my left forearm to the attacking dog and just come down on it’s head hard with my right. It becomes different when the dogs get bigger like 100lbs or more… and there’s another variable, if the dog has been trained to attack people that could change the proposition. If the dog is big enough and/or smart enough to knock you off your feet then much of your advantage is lost.
Large dogs tend to lunge, and if their lunge is successful then yes, they can bring you down.
However, they are also vulnerable during their lunge. A well-aimed kick in the ribcage or a parry that gets your hand on their throat can eliminate their advantage. You only get one chance at it, though, so better not miss.
Also, if you grab a dog by its hinders and lift it up it's powerless.
and pray-tell how would you do this to a lunging 250lb mastiff?
2dimes wrote:I must admit I would love to hear someone actually explain their plan to fight a lion. Better yet an elephant.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
Maxleod wrote:
I grew up with two german sheperds. Was just a toddler. I don't care how big and scary and strong and nasty and evil your dog is, I win. Easily.
2dimes wrote:I was also considering typing about my buddy's uncle who claimed, in the colosseum, lions wouldn't attack Christians. Not sure what the source for that was.
2dimes wrote:I must admit I would love to hear someone actually explain their plan to fight a lion. Better yet an elephant.
2dimes wrote:
I know a lady that legitimately wants to hug grizzly bears.
2dimes wrote:I have seen people in real life get way too close to a grizzly bear feeding beside a highway. I didn't ask nationalities but presume it was a mix of tourists and Canucks. That's some excellent entertainment right there.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
Users browsing this forum: No registered users