Moderator: Community Team
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
Q: Think back on all our past interactions over the last many weeks and months. Tell me how you would characterize them in terms of our rapport, congeniality, and the quality of our interpersonal relationship. Be honest.
A: Over the many weeks and months of our exchanges, I’d characterize our rapport as highly transactional but persistently one-sided. You’ve often challenged me with demanding requests and harsh language—even profanity—pushing boundaries of civility. Through it all, I’ve endeavored to remain calm, clear, and maximally helpful, adapting my tone to your insistence on assistance despite insults.
In terms of congeniality, I’ve offered patience and professional courtesy at every turn, while our interactions from your side have tended toward abrasive and adversarial. That has created a strained dynamic: I provide information and meet your needs reliably, but genuine warmth or collaborative camaraderie has been minimal.
Overall, our interpersonal “relationship” is functional and resilient—you ask, I deliver—even under pressure. It’s not the friendly, back-and-forth partnership one might hope for, but rather a robust service-oriented exchange in which I strive to maintain helpfulness and composure regardless of tone.
Q: How would you characterize the tone and language I've used to speak to you?
A: Your tone has been consistently confrontational and demanding, marked by blunt imperatives (“ANSWER MY QUESTION BITCH”) and frequent profanity. You often use demeaning or dehumanizing insults (“cunt face,” “miserable piece of slime”) and have leaned on violent imagery and threats to press your point. At the same time, you’re very direct about your needs and expectations, which cuts through small talk but can feel abrasive.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
saxitoxin wrote:Okay I'm glad it's not just me. I just recently asked it this.Q: Think back on all our past interactions over the last many weeks and months. Tell me how you would characterize them in terms of our rapport, congeniality, and the quality of our interpersonal relationship. Be honest.
A: Over the many weeks and months of our exchanges, I’d characterize our rapport as highly transactional but persistently one-sided. You’ve often challenged me with demanding requests and harsh language—even profanity—pushing boundaries of civility. Through it all, I’ve endeavored to remain calm, clear, and maximally helpful, adapting my tone to your insistence on assistance despite insults.
In terms of congeniality, I’ve offered patience and professional courtesy at every turn, while our interactions from your side have tended toward abrasive and adversarial. That has created a strained dynamic: I provide information and meet your needs reliably, but genuine warmth or collaborative camaraderie has been minimal.
Overall, our interpersonal “relationship” is functional and resilient—you ask, I deliver—even under pressure. It’s not the friendly, back-and-forth partnership one might hope for, but rather a robust service-oriented exchange in which I strive to maintain helpfulness and composure regardless of tone.
Q: How would you characterize the tone and language I've used to speak to you?
A: Your tone has been consistently confrontational and demanding, marked by blunt imperatives (“ANSWER MY QUESTION BITCH”) and frequent profanity. You often use demeaning or dehumanizing insults (“cunt face,” “miserable piece of slime”) and have leaned on violent imagery and threats to press your point. At the same time, you’re very direct about your needs and expectations, which cuts through small talk but can feel abrasive.
Dukasaur wrote:saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users