Coleman wrote:Am I being compared to soviet dictators? That's kind of nifty.
teh side shed hair style doesnt so it for the dictators.
Moderator: Cartographers
Coleman wrote:Am I being compared to soviet dictators? That's kind of nifty.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
lanyards wrote:militant wrote:I counted 57 territories, so how many territories would a player in a 2 player game start with?
Each would start with 19 if you counted correctly. That is good because the first person can't make the second person start with 1 less army by taking one territory. So the first person to take their doesn't have an advantage.
--lanyards
Elijah S wrote:Looking great guys!
Regarding the copyright of the image... (Lenin)... It would be highly unlikely that anyone (perhaps barring some old museum curator) would ever have issues with the use of an image of a historical figure.
I'm looking forward to playing this map. It has a kindof "Qwert" feel to it, and his maps are amoung my favorites. Nice work!
pepperonibread wrote:Elijah S wrote:Looking great guys!
Regarding the copyright of the image... (Lenin)... It would be highly unlikely that anyone (perhaps barring some old museum curator) would ever have issues with the use of an image of a historical figure.
I'm looking forward to playing this map. It has a kindof "Qwert" feel to it, and his maps are amoung my favorites. Nice work!
Huh, I was never really going for a qwertish style, but I guess it did turn out that way. I actually got a lot of ideas from Great Lakes, originally.
qwert wrote:Guys i want little respect when you talk about me,aim Lord Qwert.
Look mine avatar.
I must say that these map dont have mine map style,these is more artistic map of soviet union. They have pictures of Soviet Dictators,funny letters.
Its look like some Comunist propaganda map.
Pepperonibread,are you maybe member of comunist party?
iancanton wrote:soviet names in kazakhstan: almaty was alma ata, karagandy was karaganda and aktobe was aktyubinsk. although i've just spotted the obscure town of leninsk in the same region as baikonur, the latter is reasonably well-known as a launch site for space rockets, so is probably a better name for that territory.
http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/commonwe ... l_1991.gif
the one continent name that i'd change is southeast russia, to southern siberia. any place in russia which is that far away from moscow tends to be referred to as part of siberia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siberia
my only other suggestion is to give yakutia only a 3 bonus, to make it the same as kazakhstan, since it has virtually identical characteristics, including being next to a small continent.
we're moving ever closer...
ian.
unriggable wrote:A bit concerned of Lvov and Byelorussia on the small 3-digit map. Other than that, looks great.
The only difference between them is Western Republics has the option to limit it's continental borders to just two, by expanding into Leningrad from either Baltics or Byelorussia (So Leningrad and Kiev would be borders). Far East and Central Asia do not have the same luxury to expand like that and limit possible borders.Western Republics
4 Territories
3 Borders
With 3 Attackable Border Territories
Central Asia
4 Territories
3 Borders
With 3 Attackable Border Territories
Far East
4 Territories
3 Borders
With 3 Attackable Border Territories
AndyDufresne wrote:The river near Tuva seems to 'wash over' some of the black border lines (rather than replacing them like in other parts of the map).
As for Western Republics being knocked down to 2 Bonus Armies, it is essentially the same continent as Far East and Central Asia, which are currently 2 Bonus Armies.The only difference between them is Western Republics has the option to limit it's continental borders to just two, by expanding into Leningrad from either Baltics or Byelorussia (So Leningrad and Kiev would be borders). Far East and Central Asia do not have the same luxury to expand like that and limit possible borders.Western Republics
4 Territories
3 Borders
With 3 Attackable Border Territories
Central Asia
4 Territories
3 Borders
With 3 Attackable Border Territories
Far East
4 Territories
3 Borders
With 3 Attackable Border Territories
So I'd knock either Western Republics down to 2 Bonus Armies...because then all of the Identical Continents are valued the same...
Hope I made some sense...
--Andy
oaktown wrote:would it be possible to flip those "2"s in the legend upside down, so they look like 2s and not 5s?
Ogrecrusher wrote:oaktown wrote:would it be possible to flip those "2"s in the legend upside down, so they look like 2s and not 5s?
If they were flipped they'd look like 5s. Try it
Users browsing this forum: No registered users