Congrats to BENJIKAT IS DEAD

by **john1099** on Tue Mar 11, 2008 9:38 pm

You guys are thick headed, aren't you?
I am simply saying because he is a multi- he is going to be looked down upon, no matter how good or how poor he is.
No disrespect benji, your story is like so many on the site, it's hard to say who is telling the truth, and who is not, that's all I'm saying.

Good job, congrats, you broke the rules, and no one can argue that.

The bro, you're a hypocrite, and have done nothing constructive for this thread.

Thanks,
-John

by **Velvecarrots** on Tue Mar 11, 2008 11:42 pm

I think we all understand that he has two accounts, and that is technically breaking the rules. It has been no mystery.

Having said that, your posts make it seem like you don't give him any credit at all.

john1099 wrote:I am simply saying because he is a multi- he is going to be looked down upon, no matter how good or how poor he is.

Agree. Sad to say it, but it's true. And Benji has already accepted that.

john1099 wrote:No disrespect benji, your story is like so many on the site, it's hard to say who is telling the truth, and who is not, that's all I'm saying.

I think his story is quite unique. Hitting the 3000 mark is quite remarkable in itself, but after all that he's went through, it is even more of an accomplishment. But I agree, it's hard to say who's telling the truth, even though I don't agree with your position on the matter.

john1099 wrote:Good job, congrats, you broke the rules, and no one can argue that.

After reading this it sounds like "Congrats on being another multi" rather than "Congrats on getting a score of 3000, but this achievement will always be tainted by the fact that you have two accounts." I don't think you give Benji ANY credit at all for his achievement. And that must hurt him immensely.

It all really boils down to this: Do you think Benji would have reached 3000 if he had continued playing with his old account, using the same Waterloo style? Mathematically, you'd be a fool to disagree, but you may somehow see it differently. If it is the latter, please explain.

by **TeeGee** on Tue Mar 11, 2008 11:51 pm

Velvecarrots wrote:
It all really boils down to this: Do you think Benji would have reached 3000 if he had continued playing with his old account, using the same Waterloo style? Mathematically, you'd be a fool to disagree, but you may somehow see it differently. If it is the latter, please explain.

I would hate to think how many points the original benjikat would have now if his wife hadnt sabotaged his account and now playing waterloo the way he does. He was close to 3000 on the original account before the 1st event and was well over 2000 on the second if my memory serves me correctly.

I am estimating that he would have been well over 4000 by now and possibly pushing 5000

by **Scott-Land** on Tue Mar 11, 2008 11:53 pm

TeeGee wrote:
Velvecarrots wrote:
It all really boils down to this: Do you think Benji would have reached 3000 if he had continued playing with his old account, using the same Waterloo style? Mathematically, you'd be a fool to disagree, but you may somehow see it differently. If it is the latter, please explain.

I would hate to think how many points the original benjikat would have now if his wife hadnt sabotaged his account and now playing waterloo the way he does. He was close to 3000 on the original account before the 1st event and was well over 2000 on the second if my memory serves me correctly.

I am estimating that he would have been well over 4000 by now and possibly pushing 5000

you dont understand that points dont go up exponentially as it does when getting there. you literally hit a brick wall.... you can't use gorilla math and say that well he was at 2000 so add another 1000 to his score and he'd be at 4000. :roll:

where is your response to my response - velve or do you wish to ignore logic? just simply say it was an extremely poor analogy and we can move to the next point.....

by **TeeGee** on Wed Mar 12, 2008 12:11 am

Is your brain really in your butt scott?

Benji had almost 3000 before his account was wrecked the 1st time, down to well below 1000. I factored that in, but its obvious it is beyond you to do that.

by **john1099** on Wed Mar 12, 2008 12:21 am

He more than likely would have, but he would have ran into the same problems he will be running into soon, having to win 99% to gain any ground on getting higher at all.

-John

by **TeeGee** on Wed Mar 12, 2008 12:29 am

john1099 wrote:He more than likely would have, but he would have ran into the same problems he will be running into soon, having to win 99% to gain any ground on getting higher at all.

-John

I totally agree with you there

by **BENJIKAT IS DEAD** on Wed Mar 12, 2008 2:38 am

Hi all,

Can we pls let this die now?

Yes I am a multi (technically), but I will vehemently defend my integrity within the game space.

And it isn't, tbh, all that big a deal getting a virtual score on an internet site that means I was momentarily 19th on the scoreboard, and I think about 60th of all time. Like outside of CC - who gives?

Anyway I think I've hit that brick wall already, 90+% in public 1v1 games only gets you to about 3000. (as well as the fact that a bunch of people have joined my games that have clearly studied my previous ones).

Thanks,

Ben

by **KoE_Sirius** on Wed Mar 12, 2008 6:52 am

BENJIKAT IS DEAD wrote:Hi all,

Can we pls let this die now?

Yes I am a multi (technically), but I will vehemently defend my integrity within the game space.

And it isn't, tbh, all that big a deal getting a virtual score on an internet site that means I was momentarily 19th on the scoreboard, and I think about 60th of all time. Like outside of CC - who gives?

Anyway I think I've hit that brick wall already, 90+% in public 1v1 games only gets you to about 3000. (as well as the fact that a bunch of people have joined my games that have clearly studied my previous ones).

Thanks,

Ben

I was 11th on the Scoreboard...I cant wait for the new AoR map...I'll prob get to number one..I looked at the Waterloo Map...Its kinder like chess moves I think.I'll analyse it a little more.Before I come and beat you Benji

by **john1099** on Wed Mar 12, 2008 10:26 am

BENJIKAT IS DEAD wrote:Hi all,

Can we pls let this die now?

Yes I am a multi (technically), but I will vehemently defend my integrity within the game space.

And it isn't, tbh, all that big a deal getting a virtual score on an internet site that means I was momentarily 19th on the scoreboard, and I think about 60th of all time. Like outside of CC - who gives?

Anyway I think I've hit that brick wall already, 90+% in public 1v1 games only gets you to about 3000. (as well as the fact that a bunch of people have joined my games that have clearly studied my previous ones).

Thanks,

Ben

Well, you think about it bro, you're only getting about 9 (max) points per win, and losing close to 100 every loss (if I'm not mistaken), so you do have to win 11/12 to break even, which is hard to do.

Good luck though, maybe when someone tells me what the hell is going on in that map, we'll have a game.

-John

by **BENJIKAT IS DEAD** on Sat Apr 05, 2008 7:41 am

BaldAdonis wrote:
yeti_c wrote:Anyone who wants to lose some points - play this sucka on Waterloo...
We'll have a 3 game series coming up soon. Afterwards you can read the log to see how to beat him.

This has finally happened - and I swept 3-0 - better luck next time

by **roadwarrior** on Sat Apr 05, 2008 8:03 am

Nice one benji

by **BaldAdonis** on Sat Apr 05, 2008 8:36 am

BENJIKAT IS DEAD wrote:
BaldAdonis wrote:
yeti_c wrote:Anyone who wants to lose some points - play this sucka on Waterloo...
We'll have a 3 game series coming up soon. Afterwards you can read the log to see how to beat him.

This has finally happened - and I swept 3-0 - better luck next time

You mean you got to play first 3 times.... I call that a draw.