When a player takes control over the armies of another player, the least is that the substitute plays for a win.
the cheapest attitude is when a substitute takes control over an army that is not his, and intentionally suicide it into another player to lose the game later.
what happened in Game 2133824, is that after 40+ turns, poo-maker replaced codeblue, and decided to suicide me intentionally knowing that he will lose the game, giving the win to a player who also is a substitute!
I was the only one playing with my own armies and was relying on the 2 substitute to play with honor. seems poo-maker has no such thing!
so am I over reacting or there should be a code of ethics where a substitute plays to WIN!