owenshooter wrote:sideoutshu wrote:if you are too stupid to realize that when you leave someone negative feedback, they will inevitably leave it for you also, then there isn't much I can do for you. You will notice that nearly every single negative I got resulted from a negative that I left for someone else, which they carefully worded to make it seem like it wasn't retaliatory.
you are leaving negative feedback for people not taking THEIR TURN how you think they should have taken it!! that is absolutely ridiculous. who are you to decide what is poor strategy? maybe they have other goals than you think they do. you sound like an absolute horrible person to play a game with. read your negatives. sure, SOME of them are retaliatory, but a lot of them are about what a poor sport you are!!
sideoutshu wrote:Where does it say you can't leave feedback for bad strategy? Maybe it is YOU that needs to review the guidelines.
this right here just shows how foggy you are on the whole thing. you are exactly what is wrong with the current system. people abusing the system that somehow justify it due to the guidelines not being stringent... you really should go read your feedbacks left and received and see if you can perhaps, this time, see the error of your ways.-0
p.s.-from your feedback received, you aren't as perfect as you claim to be:
Negative yes, you had the game in your pocket and maybe you had a server problem. This happens to many in CC. But you are the first one who expects from me to stop playing because of this instead of accepting that I used the chance. From that point you where constantly complaining, telling me something about dignity, sportmanship and gentleman behaviour. But that I got a chance wasn't the result of the server problem but the result of a more than stupid beginner's mistake. If you would just have missed that 1 turn, I would have had 30 armies to deploy (I owned 6 countries at that time, you had 45)How far do you think I would have come with that? You could have comfortly winning the game 1 or 2 turns later. But you where in panic and tried to do your turn in 15 seconds so you lost 40 armies to deploy (not 52 like you said). This was the reason why I came back into the game and this is the reason why you didn't deserve to win. But you annoyed me so mutch that I left the game
Pretty hilarious that YOU instruct me to review the guidelines, and then once I cite them (and they support me) you criticize me because the guidlines aren't "stringent" enough? Kind of hypocritical don't you think. Either have your cake, or eat it guy....not both.
I am absoultely NOT leaving feedback for people not playing the way I want. I am leaving feedback for people doing things that are beyond the pale of anything that can be considered good strategy and things that leave them with no chance to win. For example, I played someone who told me in the game chat that if I broke his bonus, he would suicide through me and give the game to the other player. I did, and he was true to his word. You are telling me that isn't bad strategy?
I love that you keep quoting my feedbacks out of context. You speak of "all my negs" as if there are 100 of them. There are EIGHT. The particular one you cited does nothing for your argument at all, so I have no idea why you left it. It was just another retaliatory feedback. But you would know that if you actually read the game chat instead of just playing "gotcha" like you are Sherlock Holmes or something.
People like you are actually the problem with the feedback system. People who will never leave a neg no matter what because they are paralyzed by the fear of getting a neg in return and ruining their precious perfect feedback. Well my life doesn't revolve around CC, so I can live with a few negs.
.jpg)
