Moderator: Community Team
Steppin Razor wrote:I didn't put this in the abuse section, because as far as I can tell, he/she doesn't cheat, and is strategically very good.
However, this handle is highly offensive, and I'm wondering why it is allowed.
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
Dancing Mustard wrote:Goddamn Nazis!
Remember people: Dig for Victory!
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
HermannGoering wrote:A player in a game alerted me to this thread - I never for one minute thought I could arouse such controversy over the use of a name (not a statement, but merely a name).
For the record I was very drunk when I joined CC (weren't we all?) and had intended to go by the handle of Erwin Rommel - a rather more dignified general - but got my names confused. Probably something to do with having just read a book on the subject and it was floating in my paralytic subconscious. So I apologize for that and for any offence it may cause or have caused.
I happen to have had a cat called Benji that was run over by my neighbour's chauffeur, so I find the moniker she is using to be particularly distressing.
I would be (more than) happy to change my handle - do the powers-that-be on CC allow such modifications? I'd be quite alright with 'Benjikat's A C**t'.
BENJIKAT IS DEAD wrote:General comment - Yes this is a site dedicated to "world domination" - but for me it is just about some small coloured numbers moving round a screen - when it gets mixed up with real life slaughter, genocide, etc, then I wish to ignore it.
yeti_c wrote:Perhaps renaming yourself to Erwin Rommell might now be a good idea then!?
C.
lord voldemort wrote:yeti_c wrote:Perhaps renaming yourself to Erwin Rommell might now be a good idea then!?
C.
once thats allowed which shouldnt be too long
Steppin Razor wrote:I didn't put this in the abuse section, because as far as I can tell, he/she doesn't cheat, and is strategically very good.
However, this handle is highly offensive, and I'm wondering why it is allowed.
sideoutshu wrote:Steppin Razor wrote:I didn't put this in the abuse section, because as far as I can tell, he/she doesn't cheat, and is strategically very good.
However, this handle is highly offensive, and I'm wondering why it is allowed.
What if that is just his real name?
owenshooter wrote:sideoutshu wrote:Steppin Razor wrote:I didn't put this in the abuse section, because as far as I can tell, he/she doesn't cheat, and is strategically very good.
However, this handle is highly offensive, and I'm wondering why it is allowed.
What if that is just his real name?
maybe the part of the thread where he explained where/how he made the "mistake" when
he created his account, is proof enough for you that it isn't his real name... try to read the
whole thread before commenting! i am the only person allowed to fly off the handle with general
responses without reading the entire thread!!-0
jiminski wrote:precisely Owen! and perhaps it's the guys real name! did ever consider that Razor!? .. sheese!
HermannGoering wrote:For the record I was very drunk when I joined CC (weren't we all?) and had intended to go by the handle of Erwin Rommel - a rather more dignified general - but got my names confused. Probably something to do with having just read a book on the subject and it was floating in my paralytic subconscious. So I apologize for that and for any offence it may cause or have caused.
owenshooter wrote:jiminski wrote:precisely Owen! and perhaps it's the guys real name! did ever consider that Razor!? .. sheese!
it's not his real name... sigh... one more time:HermannGoering wrote:For the record I was very drunk when I joined CC (weren't we all?) and had intended to go by the handle of Erwin Rommel - a rather more dignified general - but got my names confused. Probably something to do with having just read a book on the subject and it was floating in my paralytic subconscious. So I apologize for that and for any offence it may cause or have caused.
Pedronicus wrote:Steppin Razor wrote:I didn't put this in the abuse section, because as far as I can tell, he/she doesn't cheat, and is strategically very good.
However, this handle is highly offensive, and I'm wondering why it is allowed.
I thought that an American would welcome free speech.
Snorri1234 wrote:I believe jiminski wasn't being entirely serious in that there post of his.
wacicha wrote:Lets not go racail ---- Owen gets upset.
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: DirtyDishSoap