I'm currently in a game that has just hit round 110 and has been going on for quite some time, but is down to three players. These guys have been tough opponents in a well played game and as I just checked in one of the guys has just received two
negs so I took a peek to see what's up with that?
Curious enough, it's the winner who left a
negative for the only player who bothered to speak up against his dominance in the game, which is just another lame reason for more BS feedback.
Negative whined and insulted people all game - check the game chat -
1521836 -
eorg ( 8-0 )
So I did check out the game chat.
eorg won the game in round 70 after making non-aggression pacts all over the place... which is cool as he appears to be a master of diplomacy, even when he is obviously the strongest player on the map.
geoff@xtra.co.nz who received the
neg was chatting up that orange was going to win and that all these pacts were making him even stronger and was getting frustrated as the game ran on. The chat is lengthy, but not particularly insulting or whinging. One of the players he was complaining to/about was blue, who responds late in the game with,
shachar:
"geoff, don't fool yourself, This game was by far the most boring game I ever had. And the longest" and
"The only reason I went along with eorg was because you and yellow were the reason for this."OMFG! this game is over 50 rounds... somebody end it already.