Moderator: Community Team
zimmah wrote:post here the proof of people abusing the system (leaving mass 5's or mass 1's)
http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... T24&page=2
http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... name=Hrvat
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
zimmah wrote:post here the proof of people abusing the system (leaving mass 5's or mass 1's)
http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... T24&page=2
http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... name=Hrvat
jako wrote:i wouldnt say leaving mass 5s is abusing, maybe hes just a really easy rater.
...DiM wrote:why am i not surprised johnny is listed?
zimmah wrote:jako wrote:i wouldnt say leaving mass 5s is abusing, maybe hes just a really easy rater.
it is
As has been said many times all memebers are free to investigate to there hearts content other memebers regardless of level of involvement with said memebers although this is probaly better suited for cheating and abuse since it is about abusing the new system...xxtig12683xx wrote:zimmah wrote:jako wrote:i wouldnt say leaving mass 5s is abusing, maybe hes just a really easy rater.
it is
What are you, the ratings police?![]()
-tig
Soloman wrote:As has been said many times all memebers are free to investigate to there hearts content other memebers regardless of level of involvement with said memebers although this is probaly better suited for cheating and abuse since it is about abusing the new system...xxtig12683xx wrote:zimmah wrote:jako wrote:i wouldnt say leaving mass 5s is abusing, maybe hes just a really easy rater.
it is
What are you, the ratings police?![]()
-tig
zimmah wrote:post here the proof of people abusing the system (leaving mass 5's or mass 1's)
http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... T24&page=2
http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... name=Hrvat
zimmah wrote:post here the proof of people abusing the system (leaving mass 5's or mass 1's)
http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... T24&page=2
http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... name=Hrvat
owenshooter wrote:show me where in the rules that leaving all 5's is abuse. sounds perfectly normal to me... are you now suddenly the Star Mod? this is just becoming funny. your new crusade is getting out of hand. again, please show me where leaving all 5's is abuse of the system.-0
I think her argument is it dilutes the process and creates a unreasonable expectation to give and get 5's for just average games thereby creating issues with people who follow the system based on the star levels as they are defined and those that do not uses ithe stars as defined.owenshooter wrote:show me where in the rules that leaving all 5's is abuse. sounds perfectly normal to me... are you now suddenly the Star Mod? this is just becoming funny. your new crusade is getting out of hand. again, please show me where leaving all 5's is abuse of the system.-0
Soloman wrote:I think her argument is it dilutes the process and creates a unreasonable expectation to give and get 5's for just average games thereby creating issues with people who follow the system based on the star levels as they are defined and those that do not uses ithe stars as defined.
owenshooter wrote:Soloman wrote:I think her argument is it dilutes the process and creates a unreasonable expectation to give and get 5's for just average games thereby creating issues with people who follow the system based on the star levels as they are defined and those that do not uses ithe stars as defined.
i am pretty much a newb at this system. can you please show me where this is defined by lack and not by zimmah? i think you are confusing HER RATING with an official rating. no, it is HER OPINION, not an official site rule. again, i'm a newb to this system, so please educate me. thanks.-0
alyzMAMA wrote:why do we have ratings now anyway? is it cuz alot of people would leave bad feedback with mean words? in my opinion if someone leaves alot of 5stars it does not mean they are "abusing"anything because they probably had no problems with the player and liked how the game went. if they want to give out lots of stars sooo be it.
owenshooter wrote:Soloman wrote:I think her argument is it dilutes the process and creates a unreasonable expectation to give and get 5's for just average games thereby creating issues with people who follow the system based on the star levels as they are defined and those that do not uses ithe stars as defined.
i am pretty much a newb at this system. can you please show me where this is defined by lack and not by zimmah? i think you are confusing HER RATING with an official rating. no, it is HER OPINION, not an official site rule. again, i'm a newb to this system, so please educate me. thanks.-0
Soloman wrote:owenshooter wrote:Soloman wrote:I think her argument is it dilutes the process and creates a unreasonable expectation to give and get 5's for just average games thereby creating issues with people who follow the system based on the star levels as they are defined and those that do not uses ithe stars as defined.
i am pretty much a newb at this system. can you please show me where this is defined by lack and not by zimmah? i think you are confusing HER RATING with an official rating. no, it is HER OPINION, not an official site rule. again, i'm a newb to this system, so please educate me. thanks.-0
yes if you move the arrow over the stars it tells you what each star level means now where it gets sticky like the old system is what someone considers average or above average, But again to answer your question lack built it into the system...
White Moose wrote:zimmah wrote:post here the proof of people abusing the system (leaving mass 5's or mass 1's)
http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... T24&page=2
http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... name=Hrvat
I wouldn't call that abusing, everyone has diffrent opinions on how their opponents plays. Perhaps those 2 just feels that if they just play a clean and good game that they deserve a 5've.
wicked wrote:zimmah, let's let people get used to the system first, and realize all 5's aren't really the way to go. I wouldn't classify it as abuse yet, as people are still getting used to how to rate.
Soloman wrote:I think his argument is it dilutes the process and creates a unreasonable expectation to give and get 5's for just average games thereby creating issues with people who follow the system based on the star levels as they are defined and those that do not uses ithe stars as defined.owenshooter wrote:show me where in the rules that leaving all 5's is abuse. sounds perfectly normal to me... are you now suddenly the Star Mod? this is just becoming funny. your new crusade is getting out of hand. again, please show me where leaving all 5's is abuse of the system.-0
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users