Joodoo wrote:Any ideas for platinum and diamond requirements for Cross-Map and Ratings Medal?
Well obviously for X-map - it would be 80 & 100...
C.
Moderator: Community Team
Joodoo wrote:Any ideas for platinum and diamond requirements for Cross-Map and Ratings Medal?
Joodoo wrote:Any ideas for platinum and diamond requirements for Cross-Map and Ratings Medal?
owenshooter wrote:i still think win percentage should be worth a medal.-0
Gengoldy wrote:Of all the games I've played, and there have been some poor sports and cursing players out there, you are by far the lowest and with the least class.
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:Lhuth wrote:Haven't read the entire thread so this may or may not have come up already, but the only other medal idea i can think of is a total games completed medal - maybe 100,500,1000 or soemthing like that?
edit
1,000
5,000
10,000
owenshooter wrote:i still think win percentage should be worth a medal.-0
owenshooter wrote:i still think win percentage should be worth a medal.-0
Blitzaholic wrote:owenshooter wrote:i still think win percentage should be worth a medal.-0
agreed, but would need a limit of at least 100 games played or something
cause noobs could come on and be 2-0 or 9-1, doesnt say much on so little games
White Moose wrote:owenshooter wrote:i still think win percentage should be worth a medal.-0
I don't think that would work at all..
Robinette wrote:soooooo... like, 60% would be bronze, 70% would be silver, and under 30% gold?
hey... i'm just asskin'
owenshooter wrote:White Moose wrote:owenshooter wrote:i still think win percentage should be worth a medal.-0
I don't think that would work at all..
please explain further. i have an over 60% win percentage and over 600 games played. why not get medals for win percentage based on how many games played? that way, like with blitz's points medal suggestion, people will know what you have accomplished as a player on the site. moose, you have over 1200 games and over 50%, that is a accomplishment!! if you are going to hand out medals for how many times you hand out ratings to people, why not for something that is an actual indicator of how good a player is? it could world. and robinette:Robinette wrote:soooooo... like, 60% would be bronze, 70% would be silver, and under 30% gold?
hey... i'm just asskin'
not even going to bite... i know how to scroll to the bottom of your posts...-0
owenshooter wrote:Robinette wrote:soooooo... like, 60% would be bronze, 70% would be silver, and under 30% gold?
hey... i'm just asskin'
not even going to bite... i know how to scroll to the bottom of your posts...-0
Blitzaholic wrote:owenshooter wrote:i still think win percentage should be worth a medal.-0
agreed, but would need a limit of at least 100 games played or something
cause noobs could come on and be 2-0 or 9-1, doesnt say much on so little games
Robinette wrote:
but all kidding aside... you can't really be serious about this...are you gonna strip medals?
no, you cant get a medal for stripping robin, court would have the gold in no time. (blitz emphasis)
What you really want is a stat next to your name showing your highest ever %... which should be right next to your highest ever score, right next to your highest ever rank... Now all THAT, right next to that persons' current info, would tell you alot about that persons game.
happy2seeyou wrote:I'm not for the percentage medal either... A newby joins and wins his first game, he gets a medal for 100% win ratio?? Ughhh no thanks. Win percentage changes and also doesn't cover terminator points won.
Robinette wrote:What you really want is a stat next to your name showing your highest ever %... which should be right next to your highest ever score, right next to your highest ever rank... Now all THAT, right next to that persons' current info, would tell you alot about that persons game.
owenshooter wrote:Robinette wrote:What you really want is a stat next to your name showing your highest ever %... which should be right next to your highest ever score, right next to your highest ever rank... Now all THAT, right next to that persons' current info, would tell you alot about that persons game.
every now and then you come up with something good... this is one of those times... i like this... it is less circle jerky than the whole medal thing, and it would show you more about the player than any of the current systems do... wow... rob has a good one here...-0
Robinette wrote:mnnnn.... i thought it was a good idea... but if you like it that much, then there MUST be something wrong with it afterall...
Blitzaholic wrote:Blitzaholic wrote:owenshooter wrote:i still think win percentage should be worth a medal.-0
agreed, but would need a limit of at least 100 games played or something
cause noobs could come on and be 2-0 or 9-1, doesnt say much on so little games
Just in case court or robin missed itI am starting to think they both may be natural blondes that dyed there hair.
Robinette wrote:... and even if there was a 100 game min...
lol, well court did it, sometimes i get you 2 confused cause you both so much alikeRobinette wrote:Blitzaholic wrote:Blitzaholic wrote:owenshooter wrote:i still think win percentage should be worth a medal.-0
agreed, but would need a limit of at least 100 games played or something
cause noobs could come on and be 2-0 or 9-1, doesnt say much on so little games
Just in case court or robin missed itI am starting to think they both may be natural blondes that dyed there hair.
Robinette wrote:... and even if there was a 100 game min...
Just in case you missed it...
owenshooter wrote:happy2seeyou wrote:I'm not for the percentage medal either... A newby joins and wins his first game, he gets a medal for 100% win ratio?? Ughhh no thanks. Win percentage changes and also doesn't cover terminator points won.
read the thread, newb... ahem... yeah, i'm serious. you get a win percentage medal for your best percentage for a certain amount of games. 100, 500, 1000, etc... maybe lower... just like blitz's suggestion with highest point totals medals, it shows what you have accomplished. i mean, if you hit 3500 points, and slide back to 2600, wouldn't you want a medal for what you accomplished? my dad has a medal for getting injured in vietnam, he healed, but he still has the medal! so yeah, i think a medal for something you did, to show what you accomplished is a very valid thing@!!!-0
Blitzaholic wrote:lol, well court did it, sometimes i get you 2 confused cause you both so much alikeRobinette wrote:Blitzaholic wrote:Blitzaholic wrote:owenshooter wrote:i still think win percentage should be worth a medal.-0
agreed, but would need a limit of at least 100 games played or something
cause noobs could come on and be 2-0 or 9-1, doesnt say much on so little games
Just in case court or robin missed itI am starting to think they both may be natural blondes that dyed there hair.
Robinette wrote:... and even if there was a 100 game min...
Just in case you missed it...
owenshooter wrote:White Moose wrote:owenshooter wrote:i still think win percentage should be worth a medal.-0
I don't think that would work at all..
please explain further. i have an over 60% win percentage and over 600 games played. why not get medals for win percentage based on how many games played? that way, like with blitz's points medal suggestion, people will know what you have accomplished as a player on the site. moose, you have over 1200 games and over 50%, that is a accomplishment!! if you are going to hand out medals for how many times you hand out ratings to people, why not for something that is an actual indicator of how good a player is? it could work. and robinette:
White Moose wrote:Sure, i can explain why i think that.
There is a lot of diffrent playstyles you can do here on CC.
For example:
You can play almost only 1v1 games, you can play almost only 6-8 player games.
Two very diffrent playstyles, BUT!
You win 1v1 games much much more often than you win 6-8 player games.
If you win 50%+ 1v1 games, then you are a good 1v1 player.
If you win 50% of all 6-8-player games then you are maybe THE best player here on CC.
I don't know any good numbers for 6-8-player game win ratio, but i would guess that 30%+ is good.
So here.
Should the person who play 1v1 games get a medal for high win % which a player who perhaps has played a total of 1000 games in 6-8player games, and therefor has very very big problems at increasing their win % to 50?
It simply wouldn't work out..
owenshooter wrote:Robinette wrote:What you really want is a stat next to your name showing your highest ever %... which should be right next to your highest ever score, right next to your highest ever rank... Now all THAT, right next to that persons' current info, would tell you alot about that persons game.
every now and then you come up with something good... this is one of those times... i like this... it is less circle jerky than the whole medal thing, and it would show you more about the player than any of the current systems do... wow... rob has a good one here...-0
p.s.-lack would clean up off of JR if he starts making replicas of medals and selling them in the shop.... you all know you laughed and nodded your heads yes!!!
PLAYER57832 wrote:(though I wouldn't mind getting a gold every time I hit 47% wins ...)
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users