ParadiceCity9 wrote:I think I've said this before, but if I haven't..
I don't care that they foed me. I just think it's a dumb reason to be foed. Not too complicated. That's all I've been trying to say and have said (I think).
There are many dumb things related to this discussion but putting someone on your foe list because you are on theirs isn't one of them.
Dumb thing #1:
ParadiceCity9 wrote:I find it annoying when people put me on their foe list, just because they're on mine. It doesn't make sense. That's a completely illegitimate reason for foeing someone.
p.s. -- Yes, I know I did this to someone, but I foed that person because of the fact that they foed me, not because I'm on their foe list.
If you are one their foe list, then they foe'd you and vice versa (unless your suggesting some sort of immaculate foe'ing), trying to distinguish between the act and the result is meaningless in this case. If you murder someone, are you a murderer because you killed someone or because the person you killed is dead?
Dumb thing #2:
ParadiceCity9 wrote:owen why are you an Mule (edited by Wacicha)? I'm just stating my opinion that foeing someone for being foed is stupid. That's all.
Calling someone rude names because they stated an opinion and then justifying your rudeness by saying you're just stating your opinion is hypocritical. Practice what you preach.
Dumb thing #3:
ParadiceCity9 wrote:I don't recall putting him on, but if he was, I removed him. I probably had him on because he was at like 400 points and had a ton of negative feedback.
Pre-emptive foe'ing? Really? You didn't even play him before deciding that he was your foe? It sounds like you add players to your foe list in a pretty cavalier manner (you don't remember why or even if you added wrestler1ump), and yet you scream blue murder when someone adds you to their foe list for what you deem to be a trivial reason.
To be absolutely fair the dumbest thing of all is the foe list itself. After all, if player A doesn't want to play with player B and subsequently adds B to his/her foe list, then player A is in effect also preventing players C-Z from playing with player B any time player A joins a game prior to B. That's not fair. What if I want to play with an inept strategist who has a bad attitude (not saying that's you, wrestler1ump), why should some other player have the right to keep me from doing so?