Moderator: Community Team
ZeakCytho wrote:As far as I can tell (and I could be wrong) this is what PC9's argument is, laid out in a slightly more formal way:
Premise 1) It is "legal" to put someone on your foe list because of bad gaming strategies on their part
Conclusion 1) If someone puts you on their foe list, it is because you had a bad strategy
Premise 2) You did not have a bad strategy, yet you were put on someone's foe list anyway
Conclusion 2) The foeing was "illegal"
ParadiceCity9 wrote:I can't explain it anymore than I already have. It makes sense.
ParadiceCity9 wrote:Maybe you can give some tips to owen on how to respond to an opinion.
ParadiceCity9 wrote:See like I said andy...he spurs the arguments. He responded to me. I'm not gonna respond to him to avoid any confrontation.
ParadiceCity9 wrote:Actually no. Just thought of something. Think of it as, if he had just put me on foe list because I made a lot of bad plays or something, I'd be fine with that. But his reasons for foeing me are why I foed him.
That help?
owenshooter wrote:keep quoting the things that make no sense... it will make us ALL see the error of our ways.. oh, paradice, show me the way... i am lost in this jungle of CC darkness...-0
p.s.-i think i see a windmill..
p.p.s.-that was a reference to an earlier reference which probably went over your head.
trapyoung wrote:owenshooter wrote:keep quoting the things that make no sense... it will make us ALL see the error of our ways.. oh, paradice, show me the way... i am lost in this jungle of CC darkness...-0
p.s.-i think i see a windmill..
p.p.s.-that was a reference to an earlier reference which probably went over your head.
flaming outside of flame wars, well i thought i'd never see the day.
ParadiceCity9 wrote:I added that little part about me foeing after being foed, but not for being on the foe list in case that person came in and said that I did that, which is the only time I have foed after being foed. But if you actually read my last post, you'll know it wasn't in return for being foed, as you seem to think it was.
ParadiceCity9 wrote:No I didn't respond to him, I responded to him posting, not to his post. And to owen (the PM), I never said your post was a confrontation. I was just pointing out to andy that you were the one who potentially cause a confrontation. I never intend for my posts to become big arguments, but you make them that with your rude and hurtful posts.
ParadiceCity9 wrote:No I didn't respond to him, I responded to him posting, not to his post. And to owen (the PM), I never said your post was a confrontation. I was just pointing out to andy that you were the one who potentially cause a confrontation. I never intend for my posts to become big arguments, but you make them that with your rude and hurtful posts.
ParadiceCity9 wrote:It's different for foeing someone for just being on their foe list than foeing someone who foed you for dumb reasons.
That's all I have said. It's quite easy to understand. Owen, reading comprehension..again..
owenshooter wrote:ParadiceCity9 wrote:It's different for foeing someone for just being on their foe list than foeing someone who foed you for dumb reasons.
That's all I have said. It's quite easy to understand. Owen, reading comprehension..again..
OOOHHHH... that makes perfect sense... to you. i still don't get it. it still makes no sense to me.. and you can't try to get me on reading comprehension, we both know you are the one that has difficulty with the written word. this thread/concept still makes no sense.-0
ParadiceCity9 wrote:If it makes no sense, then you obviously have trouble with the most simple things in life.
owenshooter wrote:ParadiceCity9 wrote:If it makes no sense, then you obviously have trouble with the most simple things in life.
nobody in this thread agrees with you or understands you!! don't be obtuse, admit you are wrong.-0
ParadiceCity9 wrote:Wait a second..I even said on like page 3 that it was resolved as a matter of opinion. You can't bring this thread up again and tell me to admit I'm wrong.
owenshooter wrote:ParadiceCity9 wrote:Wait a second..I even said on like page 3 that it was resolved as a matter of opinion. You can't bring this thread up again and tell me to admit I'm wrong.
*rolling my eyes*... i feel like someone needs to throw a telethon for you...-0
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users