Conquer Club

Initial Troop Deployment *Pending*

Suggestions that have been archived.

Moderator: Community Team

Re: Initial Troop Deployment *Pending*

Postby KLOBBER on Sun Jun 29, 2008 1:37 pm

I like this idea, but I have a question:

What would happen to this process if one of the players failed to choose his army location for one or more turns?

Would the server choose a spot for his next army automatically?

Would this count towards his three-turn limit for missing turns?
KLOBBER's Highest Score: 3642 (General)

KLOBBER's Highest place on scoreboard: #15 (fifteen) out of 20,000+ players.

For info about winning, click here.
User avatar
Private 1st Class KLOBBER
 
Posts: 933
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 4:57 pm
Location: ----- I have upped my rank -- NOW UP YOURS! -----

Re: go speed

Postby daddy1gringo on Tue Jul 29, 2008 7:56 pm

herndawg wrote:This would be great in Speed Games, much more real life. Seems it would extend games a lot in 24 hr turns with 8 players. I vote for it in speed games option at the least.

I actually came to this forum to suggest that for speed games there be the option of doing it exactly like the board game: players take turns choosing countries then when all countries are taken they take turns deploying on them as they choose. So I'll mention it here and I guess start another thread with this different but related suggestion. Btw I vote "yes" to this thread question, sounds like a good option.
The right answer to the wrong question is still the wrong answer to the real question.
User avatar
Lieutenant daddy1gringo
 
Posts: 532
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 7:47 am
Location: Connecticut yankee expatriated in Houston, Texas area, by way of Isabela, NW PR

Re: Initial Troop Deployment *Pending*

Postby lt_oddball on Wed Jul 30, 2008 7:15 am

KLOBBER wrote:I like this idea, but I have a question:

What would happen to this process if one of the players failed to choose his army location for one or more turns?

1) Would the server choose a spot for his next army automatically?

2) Would this count towards his three-turn limit for missing turns?


1) yes and 2) who gives a damn... these are details... focus on the big issue. :mrgreen:

Like why the hell is there no implementation or big scale referendumof this issue since two-thousand-and-SIX ?!?!? ](*,)
Barbarus hic ego sum, quia non intellegor ulli.
User avatar
Major lt_oddball
 
Posts: 364
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:17 am
Location: Fortress Europe

Re: Initial Troop Deployment *Pending*

Postby yeti_c on Wed Jul 30, 2008 9:36 am

Personally - I think that if a player misses the deployment phase - then they should get booted - and their territories converted to neutral 3's.

C.
Image
Highest score : 2297
User avatar
Lieutenant yeti_c
 
Posts: 9624
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am

Re: Initial Troop Deployment *Pending*

Postby iamkoolerthanu on Wed Jul 30, 2008 2:46 pm

this idea seems like a really good one! as i read through the posts here, people were saying that it would make games too long. no, it really wouldn't, its just one more turn each player. i vote yes.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class iamkoolerthanu
 
Posts: 4119
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 6:56 pm
Location: looking at my highest score: 2715, #170

Auto Deploy and Sequential Deployment

Postby amos_trask on Fri Oct 03, 2008 2:33 am

Concise description:
    Everyone has had games like it.... someone lands a whole continent at the beginning of the game or you get dropped in the worst place possible so you are pretty useless through the whole game... Maybe there is a way to solve this... Sequential deployment.

Specifics:
    At the minute all territories are auto deployed. When I have played the "board" version each player takes their first turns choosing thier territories (one per turn) for an equal number of turns. So only with clever deployment can anyone really gain an advantage. I have no idea whether this can be implemented, maybe you would also need to be able to turn this option on and off say casual off, speed games on.

This will improve the following aspects of the site:
    I think it would make some games more interesting and add another level to the game.
User avatar
Cook amos_trask
 
Posts: 28
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 4:58 am
Location: probably sat at work trying to avoid said work..

Re: Auto Deploy and Sequential Deployment

Postby FabledIntegral on Fri Oct 03, 2008 3:43 am

I thought that in the board game cards dictated who went where? Or was that only in 1v1 games?
Major FabledIntegral
 
Posts: 1085
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 6:04 pm
Location: Highest Rank: 7 Highest Score: 3810

Re: Auto Deploy and Sequential Deployment

Postby amos_trask on Fri Oct 03, 2008 4:33 am

I think so but we have always played you choose a territ each turn with 3 units on... once the board is full you then get your normal reinforcement round... It works well, its very rare someone lands a whole continent, one of you would block them.
User avatar
Cook amos_trask
 
Posts: 28
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 4:58 am
Location: probably sat at work trying to avoid said work..

Re: Auto Deploy and Sequential Deployment

Postby Jeff Hardy on Fri Oct 03, 2008 7:51 am

amos_trask wrote:I think so but we have always played you choose a territ each turn with 3 units on... once the board is full you then get your normal reinforcement round... It works well, its very rare someone lands a whole continent, one of you would block them.

when i play with friends everyone gets a continent first round :lol:
General Jeff Hardy
 
Posts: 1338
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 10:22 am
Location: Matt Hardy's account, you can play against me there

Re: Auto Deploy and Sequential Deployment

Postby blakebowling on Fri Oct 03, 2008 12:21 pm

Jeff Hardy wrote:
amos_trask wrote:I think so but we have always played you choose a territ each turn with 3 units on... once the board is full you then get your normal reinforcement round... It works well, its very rare someone lands a whole continent, one of you would block them.

when i play with friends everyone gets a continent first round :lol:

Only fair way to do it, as long as you get Asia ;)
Private blakebowling
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:09 pm
Location: 127.0.0.1

Re: Auto Deploy and Sequential Deployment

Postby TaCktiX on Fri Oct 03, 2008 1:12 pm

The official rules condone two methods: shuffling the non-wild Risk cards and parceling them out evenly (CC's implementation), or single placement of each territory, then turn-by-turn reinforcement of those up to a specified number of troops (depends on number of people playing). The latter method is really messy and time-consuming, hence why it's not used except among friends who are RTing it and have patience. It's also a coding nightmare.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class TaCktiX
 
Posts: 2392
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 8:24 pm
Location: Rapid City, SD

Re: Auto Deploy and Sequential Deployment

Postby cicero on Fri Oct 03, 2008 1:56 pm

Merged with the existing Initial Troop Deployment - first post here

Don't let the *Pending* marking put you off. If we can get the best elements of the discussions so far into one effective idea then perhaps this may be upgraded to *To Do* ... who knows how these turtles think ;)

Cicero
FREE M-E-Mbership and simple rules. Conquer Club - it's not complicated.

random me statistic @ 13 December 2008 - 1336 posts : 232nd most public posts (not counting Tower of Babble) of all time.
User avatar
Sergeant cicero
 
Posts: 1358
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 1:51 pm
Location: with the infected neutrals ... handing out maps to help them find their way to CC

Previous

Return to Archived Suggestions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users